|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 09:50 AM Original message |
Poll question: Would you have supported an Afghan War Surge under bush? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Solly Mack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 09:52 AM Response to Original message |
1. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timeforpeace (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 11:34 AM Response to Reply #1 |
29. We would have been calling for his impeachment if he had pulled this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:11 PM Response to Reply #29 |
82. Deleted message |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
2. Yes. As long as he pulled out of Iraq. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 10:37 AM Response to Reply #2 |
14. Exactly - that's the part that wouldn't have happened under the neocons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 10:53 AM Response to Reply #14 |
18. And a big reason why I voted for Obama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 09:55 AM Response to Original message |
3. I was pleased (or at least less angry) at the Iraq surge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 10:01 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timtom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
4. Certainly not! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 03:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
56. What was illegal about the invasion of Afghanistan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 04:16 PM Response to Reply #56 |
65. Deleted message |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 04:18 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. I'm so terribly hurt by your scorn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:56 PM Response to Reply #66 |
119. Deleted message |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 04:45 PM Response to Reply #56 |
71. Where's your proof that CIA agent Osama Bin Laden was in Afghanistan in 2001 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 04:46 PM Response to Reply #71 |
72. The Taliban said they wouldn't turn him over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 04:49 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. Who told you the Taliban said that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 04:57 PM Response to Reply #73 |
77. John Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:12 PM Response to Reply #77 |
84. If you support nuclear weapons being used on a nation that has never threatened the United States |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:17 PM Response to Reply #84 |
88. Afghanistan was housing the man and organization that caused 9/11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:19 PM Response to Reply #88 |
92. I'm not convinced that Truman made the right decision either |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:21 PM Response to Reply #92 |
97. At the time we nuked Japan, they were already crumbling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:44 PM Response to Reply #97 |
116. Deleted sub-thread |
bvar22 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 10:16 AM Response to Reply #88 |
139. Afghanistan had NO central government. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:21 PM Response to Reply #84 |
98. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:25 PM Response to Reply #98 |
101. Deleted message |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:14 PM Response to Reply #73 |
87. And only truthful reports come out of CIA station chiefs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:17 PM Response to Reply #87 |
89. I don't think the report came from the CIA itself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:23 PM Response to Reply #89 |
100. How about you source that and get back to me then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timtom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:03 PM Response to Reply #56 |
79. First of all, like the invasion of Iraq, the invasion of Afghanistan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:07 PM Response to Reply #79 |
80. So this is proof that Afghanistan never denied having Osama bin Laden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timtom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:19 PM Response to Reply #80 |
95. We refused to supply proof that he did it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:28 PM Response to Reply #95 |
103. Bush wasn't interested in finding him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:09 PM Response to Reply #56 |
81. "3000 Americans" --- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:11 PM Response to Reply #81 |
83. Tell that to John Kerry or Max Cleland |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hell Hath No Fury (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:19 PM Response to Reply #83 |
94. Don't take my word for it -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Echo In Light (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
5. No. End the Aggression |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
6. And I don't support it now, didn't support the original incursion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 03:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
55. So you feel we deserved 9/11? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 03:50 PM Response to Reply #55 |
62. No, she's saying this was blowback brought to you by the geniuses at CIA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 03:54 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. And the Afghan War is blowback brought to them by the geniuses in the Taliban |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 04:21 PM Response to Reply #64 |
68. Not really. George Bush was going to invade Afghanistan no matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 04:26 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. Bush wanted Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 08:27 PM Response to Reply #69 |
130. I know. And that's doubly true for that old felon Rumsfeld. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:47 PM Response to Reply #64 |
118. Deleted sub-thread |
Lydia Leftcoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 04:54 PM Response to Reply #55 |
74. Not that the American people deserved it, but that cynical, conniving actions (encouraging |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:13 PM Response to Reply #74 |
85. Which cynical conniver died on 9/11? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lydia Leftcoast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:21 PM Response to Reply #85 |
96. Reading comprehension, man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:30 PM Response to Reply #96 |
104. And if we didn't overlook Israel's attacks against Palestinian |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moondog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
7. Hell, no. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullimiami (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
9. no. nor do i now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 10:19 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. BS. We went into Afghanistan, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 11:07 AM Response to Reply #10 |
22. BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 11:13 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. LoL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 11:20 AM Response to Reply #24 |
27. Way to avoid the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 11:43 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Not avoiding a thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 11:47 AM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Then answer the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 11:54 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Yawn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 11:57 AM Response to Reply #32 |
33. May new(sic)? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 12:52 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. No he should have done more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 01:16 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Yawn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 02:08 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. But I thought you were sure you had a handle on it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 02:14 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 02:21 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Anyone that belives in LIHOP/MIHOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 02:30 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. What do you base that on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 02:31 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. And what do you base your views on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 02:40 PM Response to Reply #46 |
50. My view is... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 02:48 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. No it's very simple. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 03:00 PM Response to Reply #51 |
52. If that is what you believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 03:22 PM Response to Reply #38 |
58. And there is evidence that FDR knew Pearl Harbor was going to happen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 03:39 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. So |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 03:43 PM Response to Reply #59 |
60. Deleted sub-thread |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
11. Nope |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
12. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JohnnyLib2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
13. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
15. Bush does not look dreamy in his swimsuit. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HopeHoops (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 10:40 AM Response to Original message |
16. And I don't support one under Obama - HOWEVER... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
StarfarerBill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
17. No, nor under actual-President Obama, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 10:58 AM Response to Original message |
19. and I don't now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
n2doc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 11:00 AM Response to Original message |
20. Didn't then (n af or iraq) and don't now. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 11:05 AM Response to Original message |
21. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tavalon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
23. No, and I don't support it under the new guy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
25. Yes. We had relatively few troops there for many years, not enough resources and attention. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 11:18 AM Response to Original message |
26. Not to prop Karzai. Maybe for some other objective. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
28. No, and the fact that we have a Democratic president doesn't change that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
34. HELL no! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BolivarianHero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
36. No... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phasma ex machina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
37. K&R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
39. Nope. It was a PR stunt then. It's a PR stunt now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrMickeysMom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 02:11 PM Response to Original message |
41. I'm surprised there are 12 "yes" votes at this point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tabasco (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
43. Yes, if he agreed to get the hell out of Iraq. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cessna Invesco Palin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
47. What kind of stupid question is that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Regret My New Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
48. Maybe I'm mistaken, but it seems like there was more support here for the Afghan War when Bush ,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 02:39 PM Response to Reply #48 |
49. Just a small group of really loud people against it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 03:52 PM Response to Reply #48 |
63. I think the more people learn about the situation there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 04:41 PM Response to Reply #63 |
70. The handwriting on the wall is in neon now. It says, "We lost, get out, get over it." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 04:58 PM Response to Reply #63 |
78. So that disqualifies the question, in a sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 08:26 PM Response to Reply #78 |
129. Maybe it depends on how you hear the question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 08:47 PM Response to Reply #129 |
133. The question is whether people would have supported the surge under Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 09:37 PM Response to Reply #133 |
135. I see what you mean. Yes, that's right, the Democrats did support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 04:56 PM Response to Reply #48 |
76. People forget that this was a major plank in the Kerry campaign |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:13 PM Response to Reply #76 |
86. People also forget who wrote that plank for Kerry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:18 PM Response to Reply #86 |
90. Maybe so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:19 PM Response to Reply #86 |
93. It wasn't Will Marshall adressing the Democratic convention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:22 PM Response to Reply #93 |
99. But who wrote the speech? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:26 PM Response to Reply #99 |
102. So you're saying Kerry didn't believe his own policy position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:32 PM Response to Reply #102 |
105. Thank you Alci |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:36 PM Response to Reply #105 |
108. Fuck the DLC, fuck their platform, and fuck them calling themselves "Democrats" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:38 PM Response to Reply #108 |
111. Dean supported Afghanistan in the 2004 primaries too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:43 PM Response to Reply #111 |
115. People initially bought into the justification |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:34 PM Response to Reply #102 |
107. Don't ask me to defend John Kerry's position on anything in 2004 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:36 PM Response to Reply #107 |
109. I was a Deaniac in 2004 too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeFree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 06:57 PM Response to Reply #109 |
124. 10 percent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:37 PM Response to Reply #107 |
110. So you'll agree that it was Kerry's position that the war in Afghanistan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:39 PM Response to Reply #110 |
112. I'll agree that the DLC agreed with Chimp & PNAC, and that Kerry was dumb enough to buy into it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:41 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. As did Dean, Clark, Edwards and Kucinich |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 06:47 PM Response to Reply #112 |
122. If you go back to the top of this sub-thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 08:22 PM Response to Reply #122 |
128. You're the one who brought Kerry into it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 08:45 PM Response to Reply #128 |
132. This has been the Democratic position for years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 09:31 PM Response to Reply #132 |
134. It is not now, nor has it ever been a "Democratic position" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-28-09 12:20 AM Response to Reply #134 |
138. That's not the question I was addressing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:40 PM Response to Reply #110 |
113. Not just Kerry. Dean, Kucinich, Clark and Edwards all supported |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
53. Bush turned his back on the International Support for the UN Mission in Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WonderGrunion (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 03:14 PM Response to Original message |
54. I would have supported removing all troops and nuking Afghanistan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 08:09 PM Response to Reply #54 |
127. Great Idea, And A Totally Acceptable Democratic Position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
57. President Obama did not lie about WMDs to get America into a war in Iraq |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 03:46 PM Response to Original message |
61. I didn't support the original invasion of Afghanistan, and I NEVER will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
67. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 06:34 PM Response to Reply #67 |
121. Deleted message |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 04:55 PM Response to Original message |
75. Yes, if it came with Iraq withdrawal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:18 PM Response to Original message |
91. No, and I don't support one under Obama either. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:33 PM Response to Original message |
106. wrong then, wrong now nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gleaner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 05:46 PM Response to Original message |
117. No..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cowcommander (679 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
120. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 06:48 PM Response to Original message |
123. Excellent question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Moochy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 07:38 PM Response to Original message |
125. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
126. support it under obama, would have supported it under bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nikki Stone1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
131. No, and I don't support it now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lib2DaBone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
136. Not just no... Hell No.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Nov-27-09 09:53 PM Response to Original message |
137. Good gawd, of course not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC