Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Indians plan Plymouth, Mass. Thanksgiving protest

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 11:39 AM
Original message
Indians plan Plymouth, Mass. Thanksgiving protest

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2009/11/26/indians_plan_plymouth_mass_thanksgiving_protest/


American Indian activists are planning to mark Thanksgiving by holding a "Day of Mourning" in Plymouth.

The United American Indians of New England say they have been holding the annual protest since 1970 to call attention to the disastrous consequences that eventually followed that first feast between European settlers and Native American tribes nearly 400 years ago.

The group's co-leader Moonanum James, a Wampanoag Indian, said native people have no reason to celebrate the arrival of the Pilgrims. He called Plymouth Rock a monument to racism and genocide.

Organizers said participants in the protest planned to gather at about noon on Thursday by the statue of Massasoit on Cole's Hill above the Plymouth
---------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. They have only themselves to blame
If you feed them and they will stick around and cause trouble.

Sometimes nature can be cruel, and starvation isn't pretty, but that's how it works sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. surely you jest
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. "They" weren't around in 1620.
And the first winter, some of the natives feed the Pilgrims involuntarily. At their first landing east of Plymouth, they found a stash of dried maize-corn that they took. It prevented the disaster of the first winter from becoming an extinction. They eventually repaid the man they stole from when Samoset arrived and complained about it. There were signs of a recent catastrophe everywhere where the Pilgrims landed and they may have assumed that the owner of the corn died. In any event, circumstances didn't give them any real choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. is it true the Wampanoag tribe never fought and killed other native americans? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. No, there were occasional territorial squabbles
but they had been at peace with their neighbors for a very long time when the Pilgrims arrived.

They stayed peaceful because they were so prosperous, combining agriculture, hunting and fishing. They knew they had a good thing going and didn't want to screw it up.

They even stayed peaceful with the Pilgrims as long as they could manage, but a combination of cultural friction and misunderstanding and one hothead Pilgrim family put the kibosh on that and relations soured quickly.

They soured to such an extent that when their numbers diminished enough that they had to intermarry with the colonists, they intermarried with black servants rather than the richer whites, something they continue to this day.

I've been privileged to know a few of them. Some still hate white folks and some are friendly, but they'd still never marry any of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Not true.
New England in 162 was in a constant state of uncertainty and Massasoit's own people, the Nipmucks, had nearly been wiped out by a plague a year or two before. American Indians are just as aggressive, greedy and cruel as anyone else. That is part of being human. The natives were real human beings and not idealized card-board cut-outs living free from negativity.

You are right that natives who were allied with the Pilgrims remained at peace with them for a generation. I wasn't until the kids and new arrivals took over that things really went down hill. The Englishmen by mid-century had become greedy and numerous and English-native relations began its downhill side in the North at that time. It started in the South pretty much as soon as English adventurers arrived looking for gold and silver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Yep, That's true.
"The natives were real human beings and not idealized card-board cut-outs living free from negativity."

That's the myth of the Noble Savage and it's just as racist as the other end of the spectrum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. I never understood the way some people fetishize indians
They're such a peaceful and enlightened people, in tune with the environment and with the spirits of the animals. They lived in perfect harmony until evil white people showed up.

Yeah, no. They had plenty of conflicts limited in scope by a lack of technology rather than altruism. They practice slavery, cannibalism, infanticide, rape and murder. In other words they showed all those same characteristics that all humans express.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. You're right, it was technology.
If the tech levels had been reversed. The Native Americans would been crossing the ocean to colonize and loot Europe and Africa.

Every sin and short-coming that present in the Europeans was present in the Natives.

The sad fact was that no one on earth during the that time would have had another conclusion. The human race hadn't reached that level of social evolution to avoid that conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Have you read "guns germs and steel"
by jared diamond? He goes over a lot of the reasons behind the different levels/rates of development from the beginning of civilization onward, and the impact this has had on modern life. It's pretty interesting read and although he probably isn't 100% right he does do a good job providing evidence and logic behind his conclusions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. I have not but it sounds interesting.
I'll put it on my to-read list. Thanks for the tip!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. an indicator of that are the Plains Indians & their culture which sprang up w/the horses' arrival.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Yep.
And how quickly the tribes and nations of the east coast adapted to guns and trading with the Europeans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. It wasn't my intention to portray them as noble savages
merely as people who had realized that stable borders were preferable to warfare and empire that risked an extremely comfortable lifestyle.

The plague, I understood, was brought by traders two years before the Pilgrims arrived and pretty much wiped out the Patuxent population. What that plague was is open to debate: the Wampanoag had no resistance at all to any of the diseases of European urban overcrowding. It could have been as mundane as measles or as exotic as typhoid from a carrier that hadn't been passed to a crew which had recovered from it at some time in the past, although it was quite possibly smallpox that had been passed around among the ship's crew and traders all the way across the Atlantic. A 30% death rate on that kind of a sea journey would have been considered unremarkable. It was a dangerous business that had tremendous potential payoffs for the survivors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. What if the Native Americans had been more resisent to European diseases?
I think that's a fasnacting "What If". I think we would be living in a vastly different country.

"merely as people who had realized that stable borders were preferable to warfare and empire that risked an extremely comfortable lifestyle."

If the Europeans had arrived a hundred years later, would that be still be true?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. There are too many "what ifs" to consider
What if Europe had realized constant warfare was a waste of treasury and life and had turned to the type of scientific exploration we saw in this country in the late 18th and all of the 19th centuries a century or two earlier? What if they'd realized the dangers of open sea voyages weren't worth baubles, timber, and glory through warfare and simply stayed home until technology improved to make it safer and medicine had improved to inoculate the natives against the diseases that would kill them? What if humanism had reigned supreme over superstition and thralldom to Rome and cultural arrogance had been kept in check?

All sorts of scenarios would have been possible, but we all need to deal with the ones that were.

I've celebrated Thanksgiving with tribal folks and told them I'm thankful they're still here, and so am I. They were pretty cool with that. We're all survivors of that ugly period in our history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PuraVidaDreamin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Geez, I live only 60 miles away from there
I should really go and spend at least one Thanks Giving day there with our Native American brethren.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. They have chosen the wrong day - Columbus Day should be the target.
Edited on Thu Nov-26-09 11:56 AM by Bobbieo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. They've protested that one, too
something I have a great deal of sympathy with. First contact was a catastrophe whenever it occurred.

First contact happened 2 years before the Pilgrims arrived. When they got there, they found the village of Patuxent vacated by Wampanoags fleeing the diseases that first contact had brought, fields cleared and houses vacant. The Pilgrims were too proud to use "heathen" shelter, but they did use the fields they found.

It's been estimated the death rate was 90% after first contact with any tribe. It was completely unintentional, but it was horrific and certainly ample reason alone to protest Columbus Day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Columbus "sold" the New World partly by promoting the enslavement of natives. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. Can't rightly blame them

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. If it werent for the European meddling the U.S would have been a 3rd world warzone
...instead of the self proclaimed 1st world warzone with gangs, guns and random rampages, that it is today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
9. They have the protest every year.
The local news media mentions it, and then the story goes away until next November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
floridablue Donating Member (996 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Shouldn't that be named
United American Native Americans of New England ? I thought we were not supposed to call Indians, Indians anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. it's cool, you have permision to use that term
it helps me when people identify themselves by their tribe, if they belong, but I'm cool with the terms, Native American, American Indian, or Indian.



-Mitakuye Oyasin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Depends on who you're asking.
I've had white folks spend fifteen minutes bitching me out over the word "Indian" even when they know I'm referring to myself.
"Native Americans" has always kind of irritated me. Technically it should refer to anyone from North, South, or Central America. That or anyone that was born in any of those places, since that's what the word "native" means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. They're taking it back
like the NAACP with "colored people".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. They should do this at the nearest Tribal Mega-Casino.
Make the irony work for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lies and propaganda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. what a shitty and rude comment.
More than the majority of us got nothing but fucked up our asses for being Natives, so your trite casino comment was lame and bullshit at the very least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
36. I don't know how much work you do with tribal people and issues, but in my part of the country
the Casino is the 800-pound gorilla that influences economics, employment and social services for LOTS of people, tribal and otherwise. The game has changed, at least around here. "Thanksgiving" is a much more complex issue, and very different from "Columbus Day."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. You know that the vast majority of American Indians don't own casinos, right? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
31. wow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
16. Well, have at it.
The 1620 Pilgrims were simply one tribe of many living in eastern MA of that time. They were good neighbors and acted like any other tribe. They traded with their neighbors, offered assistance to their friends and made war on their and their friends' enemies. They even used native currency amongst themselves. The 1620 Englishmen saved Massasoit twice, once from capture by the Naragansets (sp?) and once from disease. And they moved into unoccupied land. An epidemic had wiped out much of the Nipmuck population shortly before the Pilgrims arrived. They were eager to make friends with the Pilgrims in order to restore a balance of power with the Naragansets.

It was not until the second generation and later arrivals in Plymouth and Boston took over that things got ugly. Aggressive land dealing and heavy handed treatment generally led some of the Indian nations to revolt against the Englishmen in King Philip's War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue For You Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
21. Thanksgiving is the Plymouth Crock of holidays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
32. I volunteer to be the first of the pilgrim's spawn to be returned whence I came.
Edited on Thu Nov-26-09 02:19 PM by juno jones
Maybe I can get some health care there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Why havent you done that yet? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-27-09 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. 'Cause they won't take a cook with no money and no finalized college degree
At my age and all, I probably am not going anywhere unless the indians can pool their resources and send me.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC