Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama I continues another Bush II policy: says no to treaty banning landmines

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 11:43 AM
Original message
Obama I continues another Bush II policy: says no to treaty banning landmines
http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/tre5an5hh-us-usa-arms-landmines/

WASHINGTON, Nov. 24, 2009 (Reuters) — President Barack Obama has no plans to join a global treaty banning landmines because a policy review found the United States could not meet its security commitments without them, the State Department said on Tuesday.

"This administration undertook a policy review and we decided that our land mine policy remains in effect," spokesman Ian Kelly told a briefing five days before a review conference in Cartegena, Colombia on the 10-year-old Mine Ban Treaty.

"We determined that we would not be able to meet our national defense needs nor our security commitments to our friends and allies if we signed this convention," he said.

It was the first time the administration had publicly disclosed the decision.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Shame on them
This is one issue where Obama could make a difference without Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. I really wish he would change his mind about that.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Clinton wouldn't sign it either IIRC - no problem the farmers & sons will find them all n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. "$ecurity commitments?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC