Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Kucinich says Congress should vote down funding for Afghanistan escalation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:19 AM
Original message
Rep. Kucinich says Congress should vote down funding for Afghanistan escalation
Edited on Wed Nov-25-09 10:20 AM by bigtree
from The Hill: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/69415-kucinich-says-congress-should-vote-down-supplemental-funding-surge


11/25/09 09:50 AM ET

CONGRESS should take a stand against any war supplemental bill to fund a surge in Afghanistan, Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) said Tuesday evening.

Kucinich, a liberal Democrat who's long urged a U.S. pullout of Iraq and Afghanistan, chided an expected Obama administration decision to send 34,000 more troops to Afghanistan, and urged fellow lawmakers to try and block it.

"We cannot just put this only on President Obama's shoulders," Kucinich said of the responsibility for making decisions on strategy in Afghanistan.

"There's speculation that we're going to be asked for another $50 billion supplemental," he said. "It's Congress that has to take a stand here, as well, and Congress should say it's time to end the war."

"It's clearly an escalation. And when the president's talking about 'finish the job,' the president should be aware that the jobs that people are worried about in the United States are getting people back to work," Kucinich said. "It's not defensible. It's not connected to our national security. And it really raises questions about the extent of the Pentagon's influence on the administration."


article: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/69415-kucinich-says-congress-should-vote-down-supplemental-funding-surge
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. God, how I wish they would.
another rec for Kucinich who at least takes a stand against the MIC and those who wont stand up to the MIC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
2. only Congress is given that power
however, I have ZERO hope they will use it responsibly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. right
witness how our new majority basically codified Bush's Iraq exit plan. While it may well result in an end to that occupation, Congress' action (and the administration's) adopted most of the false premises about the fiasco which may come back to bite us. Already the commander there, Odierno, has said he's free to advise staying longer (he says he has up until March to make that decision) if there's some political problem with the installed regime he can point to.

I too want Congress to exercise their responsibility, but look at the irony in that. Without officially declaring war under the War Powers Act, they are merely pantomiming their responsibility and barely brushing up against the administration's intentions as they obligingly open up the cash drawer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:23 AM
Original message
Once more, Kucinich speaks the truth,
And sadly he'll be ignored or belittled, in Congress, in the media, and around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
8. Especially here..
I've heard the term "Kookinich" enough times to be thoroughly sick of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. "It's not defensible. It's not connected to our national security."
Rec :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
4. All the Republicans will support it as
well as plenty enough Democrats to pass it over the objections of the anti all war crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. you say that as if their natural tendency toward political timidity makes them right
You can cheer lead this all you want, but you've yet to make arguments which justify your support for an Afghanistan policy, one way or the other. Merely pointing to the political cravenness of Washington as validation is weak and as intellectually vacuous as the republican arguments (first proffered under Bush) for keeping us militarily bogged down in the country and the region looking for some 'victory' or 'success'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Just stating the way I think it will go down.
Edited on Wed Nov-25-09 11:55 AM by SIMPLYB1980
Getting your hopes up that the Anti Afghanistan Democrats are going to stop Obama's plan will just lead to more disappointment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. thanks for your concern
. . . for my hopes. I'm guessing that your posting on this thread is your way of cheering this escalation on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Not cheering I just agree with the decision.
Which makes me a cheerleader on DU so I give you what you want. Just playing my part like all others on this site.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. playing
. . . that's the part which I question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. You play your anti Afghanistan part
Edited on Wed Nov-25-09 03:28 PM by SIMPLYB1980
and I play my part. Isn't that what Democracy is all about? Anyone that supports a politician or does not support a politician are still just playing their role in Democracy. After being called a cheerleader for so long though I decided to embrace it instead of try and hide from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Cheering on the Afghanistan deployments is disgusting
Edited on Wed Nov-25-09 03:48 PM by bigtree
It contradicts and belies the concern you express for the family members you say are a part of the rotation there. The most obnoxious part is that it comes with almost no actual discussion of the issues at hand. Your post suggests that you're relishing the 'disappointment' folks feel about the deployments and are happy to rub it in.

I should remind you that this president came into office on a wave of resentment about Bush's reflexive and persistent militarism abroad. It's only a matter of Afghanistan devolving into the state we objected to in Iraq before cheerleading like yours becomes nothing but salt in a festering wound. So, have your fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Go team! Go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. clown
welcome to ignore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. Thank you now others will have to tell you
what I say. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. LOL-- I see you've had an encounter with Ignore....
There are only a couple DUers on my ignore list who haven't been tomb-stoned yet-- I find that Ignore is an excellent predictor of DU longevity. Both the current hold-outs are asshats of the first degree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. at least
. . . he makes more sense this way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #36
47. Sick
warmongering is sick. Cheering for war is sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. Should not occupations and surges at least be DEFICIT NEUTRAL?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
7. Heroin Addicts Pressure President To Stay Course In Afghanistan
LOS ANGELES—As the White House considers sweeping strategic shifts in the war in Afghanistan, heroin addicts across the nation called on President Obama Monday to stick with the current U.S. policy, which has flooded the world market with low-price narcotics. "There's no need to change nothing,

http://www.theonion.com/content/news_briefs/heroin_addicts_pressure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
9. they won't.... Congress doesn't have enough decent minded people
too many upper crust sycophants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
10. Force The GOOP Into A Corner...
David Obey has it spot on. Force a House vote to fund the escalation by raising taxes. Let the rushpublicans have to vote either to raise taxes and show real support for the troops. Let's see if they can justify not supporting our troops and voting down a funding increase that would, in essence make it difficult to carry on the Iraq/Afghan "missions".

The problem with "defunding" is the money always goes to blowing things up first...and if money is cut, it will be found somewhere else. It will mean hardships for those not on the front...and their families. It won't end the adventurism as much as stress the military beyond the already overstretched limits.

I'm fully against President Obama's escalation...this "involvement" has to end or if there is a need for more forces to "stabilize" Afghanistan, then there should be contributions from our "allies" as well. Time to end the "go it alone" cowboy adventurism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. Do you hear that sound? Off in the distance? The rustling of angry pom poms? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
optimator Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
12. awesome
time to take away Obama's credit card until he gets his priorities straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
14. That's what finally ended that other "necessary" lost war. K&R
Of course, the chickenhawks then warned of falling dominoes that didn't fall, and a bloodbath that didn't happen, after we finally left.

And, the current chickenhawks are using the same tactics now with dire warnings of the Taliban wielding nukes and an orgy of blood throughout the region if we finally acknowledge we lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. +10000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
43. +1,000,000$/troop. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DontTreadOnMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. Good thing McCain didn't win!
Edited on Wed Nov-25-09 11:04 AM by DontTreadOnMe
because he was on the 100 Year Plan... Obama has a new and improved 50 Year Plan.

Hope is NOT paying the rent anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. good thing the election is over
. . . now on to the business of vigilance, activism, and advocacy as our legislators confront these decisions from the White House and the Pentagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
18. In other news, Rep. UFOinich suggested troops buy their own ammo and plane tickets home nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SIMPLYB1980 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. You must be kidding?
Link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Left out the sarcasm smilie -- sorry. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flaneur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
44. Wow, our very own two-man asshole convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
21. He's right. As usual. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
23. If he wants it voted down, add an amendment for single payer healthcare.
That should do the trick. And if it doesn't, at least some good will come of this senseless slaughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Karmadillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
25. Damn Democratic Wing of the Democratic Party. It refuses to support
our criminal wars, it refuses to support the massive transfer of wealth to the rich, it refuses to support the assault on public education, it refuses to support the insurance industry bailout. If it can't support the bipartisan positions of the Corporate Party, what's the point of letting it hang around?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
39. +01
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #25
42. +1,000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
27. NO TO WAR IN IRAQISTAN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
28. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
29. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
31. kick(nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
32. As usual, he's right.
Nothing much more to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
34. They should. K&R.
One of these days he'll be wrong, but not today.
:kick: & R


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
40. what a refreshing change THAT would be!
Don't expect it to happen during my lifetime, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
46. He continues to be a principled man, and thus losing popularity with party loyalists.
See sig to understand why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
48. K&R.
thanks bigtree for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-26-09 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
49. K&R
Except when I R'd it it didn't move up.

I'm free to R but what good is it it if won't be R'd?

Congress, ya know, those people who are supposed to represent us
need to do more than resent us and rep us to end this steenkin' war!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC