Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mortgage Bankers Say Risk Retention Will Force Them Out of Business

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 12:13 AM
Original message
Mortgage Bankers Say Risk Retention Will Force Them Out of Business
The Community Mortgage Lenders of America (CML America) warned today that risk retention provisions in the “Restoring American Financial Stability Act” will force them out of business.

The bill would require lenders and issuers of securitized mortgages to retain as much as 10 percent of a loan sold on the secondary market, a measure intended to improve underwriting quality.

The group sent a letter to Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd on behalf of 87 community mortgage bankers from throughout the country that see $120 billion in annual mortgage production.

“We firmly believe that the language, which establishes an across-the-board credit risk retention requirement, will sharply increase borrowing costs, dramatically restrict the availability of affordable mortgage options, and cut short efforts to stabilize the fragile housing market,” the CML argued.

<SNIP>

The originate-to-distribute model of loan origination has been largely to blame for the mortgage crisis, as such a system promoted volume over quality.

http://www.thetruthaboutmortgage.com/mortgage-bankers-say-risk-retention-will-force-them-out-of-business/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed:+TheTruthAboutMortgagecom+(TheTruthAboutMortgage.com)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ArcticFox Donating Member (654 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Risk? What risk?
If they can't even risk 10% of a loan, that says everything anybody needed to know about the banks' confidence in their underwriting.

Let's get back to the good old days when banks made money steadily over time, and their well-being depended on proper consideration of the consequences of their actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 12:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. Then let the mortgage bankers go out of business.
The time has come to scrap the current banking system and start over; heavy duty rules and regulations should be the top priority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PJPhreak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Poor fuckin babies...
"let them eat Dollar Bills"

Paper has a bit of nutritional value.

Assholes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well that works out just fine for Americans ...
Edited on Wed Nov-25-09 01:15 AM by MadMaddie
The companies that have been getting a free ride with limited regulation are getting checked. If they don't have a sound business model then they go under, too fucking bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. a lecherous cog in an unnecessary machine
serves no purpose for humanity, does not serve any greater good. let them die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. This is Great --
I had thought mortgage bankers might have been required to hold the mortgages for a couple of years before selling to the secondary market.

On the opposite side, I dont' know if holding 10% of loans until maturity is going to reduce the volume of mortgages they can write. If it does, it could kill any recovery in housing dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC