Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Catering to the "centrists" in Congress and screwing the progressives

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 07:54 PM
Original message
Catering to the "centrists" in Congress and screwing the progressives
So give Mary Landrieu anything and screw Pat Leahy.

No one in Congress comes close to Leahy when it comes to working to ban landmines and to get the U.S. to join the international community in banning the use of landmines. And no one has worked harder than Leahy to repeal the anti-trust exemption for insurance companies. He's been introducing such legislation for years now.

But the leadership and the administration know that Leahy and other progressives aren't going to ever vote with the republicans so they can be treated shabbily.

It really sucks.

In the United States at the time, a determined Vermont Senator was making his voice heard on what he thought of landmines. While Senator Patrick Leahy helped enact the first law of its kind anywhere in the world to stop US exports of anti-personnel landmines in 1992, he has also helped landmine victims through the development of programs in Congress, the State and Defense Departments to address the needs of disabled victims of conflict, particularly landmine victims. In 1996, fifteen retired senior military officers, including Gen. Norman Schwarzkopf, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. David Jones, former Supreme NATO Commander Gen. John Galvin, and former commanders of U.S. forces in Korea Gen. James Hollingsworth and Gen. Henry Emerson, urged Clinton to ban anti-personnel mines stating that it would not undermine military effectiveness or the safety of American forces, but rather it would be humane and militarily responsible. That same year, Senator Leahy linked the use of landmines to the severe hunger and malnutrition faced by millions of people around the globe, as reported by the U.S. Newswire. Delegates attending the World Food Summit in Rome that year approved the language that was drafted by Leahy in November. In April 1997, Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont, in an online chat with the Granville One Room Schoolhouse, said, “I have seen landmines all over the world and have two deactivated ones on my desk. They are horrible weapons that should all be banned. They kill mostly children and innocent civilians.”

http://www.examiner.com/x-5249-SF-Foreign-Policy-Examiner~y2009m11d18-First-US-official-participation-in-formal-Mine-Ban-Treaty-meeting-Cartagena-November-30th

Ten State Attorneys General Back Leahy-Authored
Antitrust Exemption Repeal Legislation

WASHINGTON (Tuesday, Nov. 17, 2009) – Ten state Attorneys General are backing legislation authored by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) to repeal the health insurance and medical malpractice insurance industries’ exemption from federal antitrust laws.

In a letter dated November 13, Attorneys General from Vermont, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Maine, Oregon, Arizona, Iowa, Montana, Florida and Wyoming urge Congress to end the decades-old exemption from federal antitrust laws, which are designed to encourage competition and protect consumers. Dating back to the 1945 McCarran-Ferguson Act, health insurers and medical malpractice insurers have been exempt from these laws. Leahy chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, which held a hearing on the exemption in October.

“Repeal of the McCarran-Ferguson exemption would enhance competition in health and medical malpractice insurance by giving state enforcers, as well as federal enforcers additional tools to combat harmful anti-competitive conduct,” the Attorneys General wrote. “Consistent, reasoned enforcement of state and federal antitrust laws benefits market participants as well as enforcers by eliminating uncertainty.”

The letter concludes, “We urge quick action to repeal the McCarran-Ferguson exemption for health and medical malpractice insurers, making antitrust enforcement the same here as for virtually all other industries, thereby enhancing competition to the benefit of consumers.”

In September, Leahy introduced the Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act, which would repeal the exemption for flagrant antitrust violations, including price-fixing, bid rigging and market allocations, and subject health insurers and medical malpractice insurers to the same good-competition laws that apply to virtually every other company doing business in the United States.

The Health Insurance Industry Antitrust Enforcement Act is supported by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and is cosponsored by 14 other Senators. In October, Leahy announced his intention to introduce the measure as an amendment when the Senate considers health care reform legislation in the coming weeks.

State Attorneys General signing the letter to Leahy include William Sorrell, Vermont; Richard Blumenthal, Connecticut; Martha Coakley, Massachusetts; Janet Mills, Maine; John Kroger, Oregon; Terry Goddard, Arizona; Tom Miller, Iowa; Steve Bullock, Montana; Bill McCollum, Florida; and Bruce Salzburg, Wyoming. The letter is available online.

The Health Insurance Antitrust Enforcement Act is also supported by the American Dental Association, the Consumer Federation of America, the American Hospital Association, and the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Leahy has introduced legislation to repeal the McCarran-Ferguson Act in previous Congresses, including the 2007 bipartisan Insurance Industry Competition Act, which provided for a broader repeal of the McCarran-Ferguson Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC