Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oh. My. Gawd!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 07:24 PM
Original message
Oh. My. Gawd!
Pat Buchanan just said on Matthews' show what any thinking person knows: Khalid Sheik Mohammad's rights were *badly* violated when he was arrested. As a result, if we try to give him a *fair* trial, he could have the charges dropped.

Unsaid was that we should violate our own standards of justice so we can cook the guy.

No. I am NOT "supporting the terrorist". I am simply saying that we fucked this one up REALLY good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did he mention that KSM's rights were violated by the previous
admin through torture?

I didn't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Actually he did
He actually said under the last administration. Pat is a crazy piece of crap, but he is one of the more intellectually honest of the right wing asshats and when I say intellectually honest, Pat believes the nonsense coming out of his mouth more often than the rest of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. He has always been against the neocons
He was against Iraq from the start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. He's an old Republican
and he was in a White House during a war. He may be an asshole, but Pat knows what the cost of war is on a nation and a Presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. And he was vocally against the Iraq invasion. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. In for a penny, in for a pound?
Pat's saying since we violated his rights, we can't possibly think of allowing him to access any now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. I picked myself up off the floor
just in time to read this thread!! :)

and what, may I ask, does Ron Christie bring to the conversation?

Other than a complete distraction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. he's the black guy
wingers love it when their idiocy is spewed by a black person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm watching it with the sound off just to study the visual propaganda. It's appalling.
Edited on Tue Nov-24-09 07:30 PM by Gregorian
It was as though they had no host or guests, but just slowly moving closeups of KSM's face. And at the end Matthew's scowling face. The production behind that show is created in order to visually push the viewer into a specific place of thought. Or I should say multiple thoughts.

What a sick pile our media has become.


PS- I'm only watching because Kucinich will be on. Otherwise I've never watched the show, and never will again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Actually, he is full of shit.
KSM was arrested FORMALLY by the Pakistani police. There was no requirement to read him is Miranda rights because we didn't arrest him. We did take informal custody of him, and had the FBI done it "by the book", he would have been told of his rights when we took custody, and not tortured.

Alternatively, under some ruling of the UCMJ, he could have been detained by our military and accorded all the rights of a military POW under the Geneva Conventions.

We did something else.

And now that it's time to try him for either terrorist actions or war crimes we can't.

But we are going to try anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. "We" didn't fuck it up. BUSH did. Everything that man touches turns to shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. +1... Bush was the primary pooch screwer alright... And it's damn near
impossible to unscrew a pooch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. By "we" I'm being egalitarian.
"We" is the country, with the government acting on our behalf. That's true in good times and bad.

I said a bazillion times that the bush by wasn't my president. Fact is, that was a state of mind, but not a statement of fact.

"We" is appropriate here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. This guy will never see the light of day.
That's a given. Even Obama suggested as much when he said he would be executed. As long as we're all pretending there's a possibility charges could be dropped,
Obama should have never made that statement, even though it's the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Is the fear that since he wasn't Mirandized, that he'd be set free? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
15. Rec # 5 I heard it too and for the same reason my blood ran cold N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. This is the kind of shit we should expect when we allow a man with no integrity and the IQ of a
houseplant to occupy the White House. "Failure to impeach" is the sin that will forever stain this generation's reputation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. So his mommy taught him two wrongs DO make a right?
Interesting also that Patty admits the suspect's rights were violated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. No the previous * administration fucked it up for 8 years we need to lay
the blame where it belongs.

My Repug coworkers 3 of them all very young 23-35 believe that we should have prosecuted them at Guantanmo. They even said all of them plead guilty, I then asked did they plead guilty while they were tortured? They didn't have an answer....I also asked them how many tribunals were held and how many convicted? Again they had no answer....I answered for them ZERO, I asked why were they tried and sentenced they said there was no need to because they plead guilty. (At this point I am looking at them like they have lost their minds)

I then asked them why is it that we are exporting the American Democratic brand of justice to Iraq and Afghanastan why isn't our legal system good enough to prosecute them, especially since the DOJ has had such a high success rate?

Okay last one...they said we shouldn't prosecute them in New York it's an insult they are war combatants. I said we never declared war.....they said yes we did....I said no we didnt....get this...they said but Congress approved all of the money....and I said without a declaration of war.:banghead:

Anyhoo I asked them where were the Nazi's tried and convicted? They didn't know, I replied Nurmemburg Germany. One of the replies was they were soldiers and I replied that's not the point......



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atticus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Keep swingin'. My money's on you! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Thanks Atticus!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-25-09 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
22. So I guess...
...Pat Buchanan is smarter than Eric Holder.

I guess Buchanan's years at Justice give him some special insight into federal trials that the DOJ doesn't possess.

And of course Pat is a disinterested third party who has no agenda here.

Yeah, let's all get our legal information from BatShit Pat, Nixon's buddy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC