Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Economy Expanded at a 2.8% Rate in Third Quarter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:02 AM
Original message
U.S. Economy Expanded at a 2.8% Rate in Third Quarter
Edited on Tue Nov-24-09 09:03 AM by AllentownJake
Nov. 24 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. economy expanded at a 2.8 percent annual rate in the third quarter, less than the government reported last month, reflecting a smaller gain in consumer spending and a bigger trade deficit.

The increase in gross domestic product from July through September reported today by the Commerce Department in Washington compares with a 3.5 percent gain previously estimated. Corporate profits climbed by the most in five years.

Smaller increases in spending show the U.S. was dependent on government stimulus programs to help dig the world’s largest economy out of its worst recession since the 1930s. Growing profits lifted purchases of equipment and software, indicating investment by companies such as Verizon Communications Inc. will help make up for smaller gains in household purchases as unemployment mounts.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aJJ.spV04wxY&pos=2

Without Cash for Clunkers and the Homeowner tax credit, this would probably be flat or negative.

Depending on the way you want to look at it, it either shows the programs are working, or that the private sector is still struggling since without government support to two key industries there would have been no growth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah and the GDP increased from 1933 to 1939, during the1st Republicon Great Depression. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. No in 1937 it decreased
Of course, FDR started to listen to the GOP and tried to balance the budget before things were back on sound footing...President Obama is much smarter than FDR he's going to go for cuts in federal spending next year lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why say "probably"?
The data is available.

.81% of that 2.8% was from autos and parts. .45% was from residential fixed investment.

Depending on the way you want to look at it, it either shows the programs are working, or that the private sector is still struggling

No need for "either"... it shows both.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. On those programs I say it shows nothing
Edited on Tue Nov-24-09 09:18 AM by AllentownJake
When you put out an incentive to buy a capital asset like a car or a house in bad economic conditions, until you have recovery in employment you are going to run out of people you can give incentives to, to purchase a capital assets.

You can do those types of programs all you want (increase depreciation in the first year, provide a tax credit for purchases, provide a government subsidy) at the end of the day there is a limited pool of people you are targeting in a bad economy. Eventually you need the private sector to pitch in by actually producing himself.

There is a reason why they added another tax credit to the housing situation in December, there are only so many first time home owners out there to buy their first house (or at least people who fit the government description). They added another tax credit for existing homeowners to try to keep it going.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. Was that reply intended for me?
It appears that you make an assumption and then draw conclusions from the assumption as if it were fact. Then when the facts are pointed out to you, you replied by expanding on your conclusions drawn from the original assumptions?

Personal consumption contributed 2.07% of the revised 2.8% GDP growth. .81% of that was from auto purchases (in fact, the "news" from this revision was that auto sales provided much less of a bump than first estimated). There's no way to be certain how much of THAT growth was from government incentives and how much was pent-up demand, but we can be certain that cash-for-clunkers had nothing to do with the .36% contributed by recreational durable goods purchases... or the .11% contributed by furnishings and household goods... or the .47% that went to services.

All I'm saying is not to oversimplify it. There's far more in the report than just a couple of government incentive programs. Some good, some bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Do you have a link to the report
Love to read it. I'm off to do some work, but I'll take a look at it tonight.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. No problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thank you
believe it or not I do enjoy reading these things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. There's somethnig very wrong with that.
Of course... I do too. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Math and economic nerds
Now off to a non-profit to play with an accounting problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
optimator Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. how much contraction is off record
and fuck growth anyway.
what a sick pyramid scheme of a system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Well seeing that last month it was reported that Chinese Manufacturing
Edited on Tue Nov-24-09 09:17 AM by AllentownJake
is included in our GDP as long as an American Company is doing it and importing it....yeah it is a bad indicator to track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
7. I figured this would be exciting news & be posted instantly
I like the post above mine - should change ID to "pessimator" :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Do you have anything to add?
Or are you being snarky which always earns me a shame on you AllentownJake finger shaking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. No. I was going to comment that you didn't say anything about the 10% existing home sales increase
Edited on Tue Nov-24-09 09:25 AM by HughMoran
yesterday, but then did a search and noticed that you had thought about it and found a nice way to spin it negatively after initially stating "good news" in a Prosense thread. You then posted this negative spin - nice! :) http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=433&topic_id=13920

You're OK - I was worried that I hadn't seen any of your posts yesterday, but upon searching I did find that you were able to spin good news into bad - glad you're OK - carry on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I was doing work for a not for profit
About to head there now, had the flu last week so I was a miserable son of a bitch last week.

I actually was pretty consistent in both posts and pretty intellectually honest. In both I said, good news, not great news, don't understand the mortgage application number that goes with it.

I'm sorry asking questions upsets your sensibilities.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Glad you're feeling better
Asking questions is fantastic! Kudos for doing whatever work you're doing (I'll assume it's good.)

I'm sorry that my pointing out your generally pessimistic spin in everything you post upsets your sensibilities. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. I said Good News
You should be happy you got that much out of me. :hi:

There is a lot of housing inventory out there, housing starts aren't going to happen till it isn't so much cheaper to buy a house built 5 years ago than it is to build a new house.

Increase in sales is good, my only question with the mortgage application question is who are buying the houses? Is is like when retail sales increase but sales tax revenue decreases. Those two numbers should correlate. It is a decent question to ask.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Believe me - I understand the generally delicate nature of a recovery
The fits and starts - with imbalances that wouldn't exist in a healthy economy - are something to be concerned about. I'm working for a small business that's just barely keeping it's head above water. This is a big opportunity for me because if the economy turns and the products I design make inroads into the market, I could conceivably be a part-owner of this place & hire my own people. One of our biggest issues with attracting good people is not being able to afford healthcare. It actually makes younger unattached candidates more appealing - assuming we think they are "trainable". So, if I seem like I'm rooting for a recovery and healthcare reform, it's because my lifelong dream of controlling my own destiny is directly tied to it. I am the small business engineer/inventor/entrepreneur that you hear about. I'm glad you've found some work to keep you busy for now - I hope it's satisfying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Doesn't pay much and it is part-time
Edited on Tue Nov-24-09 10:35 AM by AllentownJake
but it gives me something to do other than sit around here and complain

I'm not wishing for bad things. Only saying what I see. I'd rather be full-time somewhere with money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Craftsman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
10. So where are the decent paying jobs, no jobs = no recovery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Many months away
Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC