Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's time to stop pussy-footing around with Insurance companies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 07:35 AM
Original message
It's time to stop pussy-footing around with Insurance companies
It's time to sit them down and tell them that they had a good-long looting -run.. 40 years or so, and the money-train has reached the end of the line..

It's time they returned to being insurance companies, instead of bag-men, handling pay-offs. Their 30% "take" is just more than we can bear, and we're done with it.

They need to dust off their actuarial tables, and start issuing policies for things that are "unlikely to happen", instead of the hysterically idiotic plan they have sold us on for decades. "Insurance" paid monthly for something that IS definitely going to happen is a pretty stupid plan..for all involved.

A better plan is to strip off all the money now paid into PREMIUMS, and switch that money into actual health CARE...health care paid out of TAXES on EVERYONE, since everyone will benefit.

If there is a "gap", then there is still a niche for insurance companies..to cover only that gap..

of course with small pickings coming in, the CEOs will probably have to cut back on their extravagant lifestyles, but hey.. they should have planned better for their own futures.. Isn't that what we all have been told to do?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 07:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. If the insurance companies are going to be allowed into the mix -
a huge mistake IMHO - they should be regulated like utilities. Give them a list of what they must offer and the maximum they can charge and who they must cover and how long they must cover them for. Any violation results in a "trigger" going off and that trigger is single-payer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Why do we even need them? Do you pay someone 30% on top of your electric bill
Edited on Mon Nov-23-09 08:03 AM by SoCalDem
to have them drop it off at the electric company?
the PREMIUMs deliver NO actual medical care, they only sign you up so the insurance company can use other people's premium money (along with yours) to pay or NOT pay (their choice) some/most of your health care.( can you say PONZI?)..until you no longer have a job that even allows you to send them money every month.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Apparently the 30% goes to the campaign coffers of politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. exactly.. the wheel goes round & round
and the campaign money ends up annoying the hell out of us, in the guise of commercials..and it starts all over again..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daphne08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 06:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. They are paper pushers who skim money off the top. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Great idea , but it presumes on our having many politicians who are
courageous & honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. I agree with most of what you say
except the part about covering only things that are unlikely to happen. If we're paying for health care than we should get necessary health care regardless of how common or how rare an affliction happens to be.

That said, I'd prefer single payer, but I realize that that's unlikely to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. The point wasn't one about common vs. rare afflictions
The poster was trying to say that everybody gets sick sometimes and that this is expectable and predictable and could be covered by most of us for less than the amount we're having sucked out of us for insurance. The "unlikely" part refers to illnesses or injuries that require major surgery, lifetime reliance on expensive drugs, or other things that go beyond that annual budget. If we all paid only for catastrophic illness insurance, it would be a relatively modest amount out of pocket but the coverage would be there for those of us who needed it.

That's what most insurance does, after all. It insures again auto accidents but not routine repairs, against hurricane damage but not against normal wear and tear on your house. Health insurance is the only kind where you pay someone else so they can skim 30% off the top and then cover your routine bills.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I meant unlikely to happen..as in your boat catches fire
or your car gets crashed into.. Insurance companies should have NEVER been allowed into health care.. at all.. ever..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Our fine President took single payer off the table. You might have heard.
It was in all the papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, SoCalDem.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
14. Expropriate without compensation. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC