Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Cancer) Screening Debate Reveals Culture Clash in Medicine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 10:53 AM
Original message
(Cancer) Screening Debate Reveals Culture Clash in Medicine
This week, the science of medicine bumped up against the foundations of American medical consumerism: that more is better, that saving a life is worth any sacrifice, that health care is a birthright.

Two new recommendations, calling for delaying the start and reducing the frequency of screening for breast and cervical cancer, have been met with anger and confusion from some corners, not to mention a measure of political posturing.

The backers of science-driven medicine, with its dual focus on risks and benefits, have cheered the elevation of data in the setting of standards. But many patients — and organizations of doctors and disease specialists — find themselves unready to accept the counterintuitive notion that more testing can be bad for your health.

“People are being asked to think differently about risk,” said Sheila M. Rothman, a professor of public health at Columbia University. “The public state of mind right now is that they’re frightened that evidence-based medicine is going to be equated with rationing. They don’t see it in a scientific perspective.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/20/health/20assess.html

This is an interesting article. We talk about the high cost of medical care in America, but when confronted with science and studies that recommend that we reduce testing, we're outraged. It doesn't help that most of the reduced testing just happens to be aimed at women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. I find myself wondering why the two new "recommendations"
out of the gate had to do with women's health care. Maybe there will be more recommendationsl later about men not getting prostate exams every year, or not being screened for testicular cancer, but right now? It's all about those spendthrift women...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The industry sees women as being more costly to treat than men
I don't know if that's based on facts or just prejudice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robyn66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. How about cutting Viagra coverage to save money
but you don't hear about that do you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC