Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"BASTERDS!" [sic] So many misspelled FR freakouts!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 02:55 AM
Original message
"BASTERDS!" [sic] So many misspelled FR freakouts!
Edited on Sun Nov-22-09 02:56 AM by K8-EEE
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2391762/posts



"Remember God helps those who help themselves. Lets get out thier and fight!"

"Landrieau is backpeddling like made already..."

Also, remember that this is probably illegal (although nothing to be done about it) because of the illegal subsititution of the Massachusetted senator for Teddy K.

"Without insult, will someone please succintly , clearly, explain the next steps procedureally ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ha.....
"Everything is now treated with absolute hysteria and utter doom and gloom on this forum."

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 03:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Admittedly, the spelling "basterds" is supported by "Inglourious Basterds."
Edited on Sun Nov-22-09 03:21 AM by burning rain
Though of course it may just be a random solecism as well. And generally, Freepers' sense of humor is so dismal that they consider misspellings like "series" for "serious" and "hugh" for "huge" the height of wit, and repeat them constantly.

I'm predicting that "precedent" for "president" will be the next craze in Freepistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 03:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Ha inglourious freeptards!
That's good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. freepterds (sic)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Oh, shit, that's a graphic waiting to happen.
I don't have photoshop installed on the netbook; paging Swamp Rat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. They're just upset that they lost and will never win again
Edited on Sun Nov-22-09 05:34 AM by Chulanowa
Now if only they would take their toys and go home again.

On edit, I found this gem...

To: Sarah Barracuda
"Gee, I feel European already"

If I were several years younger, I'd be moving to Australia or Canada, or some other CIVILIZED country....

America, as we knew and loved it, is history now.
80 posted on Saturday, November 21, 2009 5:26:38 PM by traditional1 ("don't gots to worry 'bout no mo'gage. Don't gots to buy no gas...Obama, he gonna take care o' me")
< Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies>

Mel Brooks couldn't write this comedy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
One of Many Donating Member (85 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. Women shouldn't be allowed to hold public office ...


Unreal insanity with two voices finally calling it out. self-hating creeps.






=========================

To: The Magical Mischief Tour

Two final holdouts give Democrats the 60 votes needed to clear the way for a full-scale debate.

Licoln and Landrieu
85 posted on Saturday, November 21, 2009 8:29:19 PM by hattend (Pray for Obama!! Psalm 109:8 Amen!)

=========================

To: hattend
Women shouldn't be allowed to hold public office and non-male, non-property owners shouldn't be allowed to vote.

Yes, I mean it. It was set up that way for several reasons.
105 posted on Saturday, November 21, 2009 8:40:48 PM by elkfersupper (Member of the Original Defiant Class) "


=========================


To: elkfersupper

I agree with you. I’m a woman myself, and I’ve been saying the same thing for years.

129 posted on Saturday, November 21, 2009 9:07:52 PM by luvEastTenn

=========================

To: elkfersupper

Frankly, I agree. And I mean it.

132 posted on Saturday, November 21, 2009 9:11:44 PM by mrsmel

=========================

To: elkfersupper
Women shouldn't be allowed to hold public office and non-male, non-property owners shouldn't be allowed to vote.

I wholeheartedly agree. I'd gladly give up my vote if it meant that the rest of the silly, emotion-ruling instead of rationality, fools lost theirs as well. My sex is an embarrassment to me.
141 posted on Saturday, November 21, 2009 9:26:55 PM by publana (Obama, you will not intimidate me into not voicing my opinions.)

=========================

To: elkfersupper
Yep.


How Dramatically Did Women's Suffrage Change the Size and Scope of Government?

JOHN R. LOTT Jr.
American Enterprise Institute (AEI) (download links for whole document at bottom of page)

September 1998

University of Chicago Law School, John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 60
Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 107, Number 6, Part 1, pp. 1163-1198, December 1999

Abstract:

This paper examines the growth of government during this century as a result of giving women the right to vote. Using cross-sectional time-series data for 1870 to 1940, we examine state government expenditures and revenue as well as voting by U.S. House and Senate state delegations and the passage of a wide range of different state laws. Suffrage coincided with immediate increases in state government expenditures and revenue and more liberal voting patterns for federal representatives, and these effects continued growing over time as more women took advantage of the franchise. Contrary to many recent suggestions, the gender gap is not something that has arisen since the 1970s, and it helps explain why American government started growing when it did.



154 posted on Saturday, November 21, 2009 9:59:38 PM by familyop (cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote)


=========================


To: elkfersupper

“Women shouldn’t be allowed to hold public office and non-male, non-property owners shouldn’t be allowed to vote.
Yes, I mean it. It was set up that way for several reasons.”

Yes, and the importation of slaves was in and guaranteed by the consitution for 20 years after it was signed in 1787 but the founding fathers left room in the that consitution for amendments and changes. K-12 education was not a “right” by the consitution either but Thomas Jefferson faught for and won, by a law that passed consitutional challenge, guaranteed, socialized education using this same system. People’s views are dynamic from generation to generation and that is precisely why our system was setup to be flexible and dynamic.

Do you seriously mean those words that you said? If so, you are fucking insane. Sorry for the harsh language but saying “Women shouldn’t be allowed to hold public office and non-male, non-property owners shouldn’t be allowed to vote” is batshit crazy, elitist and sexist.

181 posted on Sunday, November 22, 2009 12:49:44 AM by jackmercer

=========================

To: jackmercer

Excellent post.

186 posted on Sunday, November 22, 2009 2:37:32 AM by jveritas (God Bless our brave troops)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. That Thomas Jefferson! What a damn socialist!
Edited on Sun Nov-22-09 08:16 AM by treestar
The things he "faught" for! :rofl:

They forgot "non-white." :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Good Lord, that's a lot of female self loathing right there.
Sad,sad republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Unbelievable. Suffragettes are spinning in their graves. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I kind of want this in my sig line:
"Do you seriously mean those words that you said? If so, you are fucking insane." :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. The American Enterprise Institute doesn't want women voting?
That is the way I read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalyke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. I can't imagine what it would be like to either hate a person who
wasn't exactly like me so much and/or to hate people like myself so much that I would take away their civil rights and relegate them to mere chattel.

To the woman who said she'd give up her vote, fine. Do it. All Republican women who feel this way should do exactly that so that real women who aren't voting on either emotion or perceived emotion (liberal women) would have more sway, thus, electing public officials who care about women's rights - like choice, equality and the abolition of misogyny.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. Women and "non property owners" not allowed to vote? LOL
That would leave a lot of Freepers who live in mommy's basement out...God what lunatics!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
10. Remember God helps those who help themselves. Lets get out thier and fight!
Supply side Jesus in an angry Jesus. Beware libruls!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. LOL they HATE poor people WTF kind of "Christians" rail against poor sick people
Remember the thing about "the least of my brothers?" The Psalm 109:8 crowd seems to have missed that part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
15. Example, example, example
of the class of people that are republicans. And if describing republicans I would mis-spell it BASTURDS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Base-turds!
When they say Republican "base" they're being literal cuz you don't get more BASE than Freepers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffinEd Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
16. I know stupid people come in all shapes, sizes, genders, etc
But I'm going to call BS on the cretin who wrote this and say the poster is nothing more than a cowardly paranoid male slob talking shit from his momma's basement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
To: elkfersupper

I agree with you. I’m a woman myself, and I’ve been saying the same thing for years.

129 posted on Saturday, November 21, 2009 9:07:52 PM by luvEastTenn
------------------------------------------------------------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K8-EEE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. I love the Freeper "expert-ism" like this one:
They’re certainly tiptoeing all around it, but they haven’t yet gotten a court willing to strike “freedom of speech” from the Constitution yet. This right was never even enshrined in the constitutions of many European socialist nations. Their “rights” read more like a liberal’s socialist laundry list. The article I’m remembering had people from those countries openly stating that freedom of speech isn’t a primary human right.

LOL wtf is he talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC