Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McChrystal to Obama: Fogh You;

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 07:10 PM
Original message
McChrystal to Obama: Fogh You;
Edited on Sat Nov-21-09 07:17 PM by G_j

http://www.opednews.com/articles/McChrystal-to-Obama-Fogh-by-Ray-McGovern-091120-443.html

November 20, 2009 at 23:23:00

McChrystal to Obama: Fogh You; McChrystal Testing the Limits
by Ray McGovern

It is not too late for President Barack Obama to follow the example of Harry Truman, who fired Gen. Douglas McArthur in 1951 for insubordination. Then, as now, the stakes were high. Then it was Korea; now it is Afghanistan.

No more slaps on the wrist for Gen. Stanley McChrystal. In my view, Commander-in-Chief Obama should fire him for cause.

Then

In the Truman-McArthur showdown nearly six decades ago, the President and his senior advisers were preparing to engage North Korea and China in peace negotiations, when MacArthur, commander of the U.N. forces in Korea, issued an unauthorized statement containing a veiled threat to expand the war into China.


McArthur had been playing a back-channel game to win the support of like-minded Republican congressmen to widen the war, when Truman faced him down. With the backing of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as well as the secretaries of state and defense, he rose to the occasion and fired the distinguished “old soldier.”

Now

Today, Gen. McChrystal is conducting a subtler but equally insubordinate campaign for wider war in Afghanistan, with the backing of CENTCOM commander David Petraeus. It is now even clearer in retrospect that the President should not have appointed McChrystal in the first place, given what was already known of his role in covering up the killing of football star Pat Tillman and condoning the torture practices by troops under McChrystal's earlier command in Iraq.

..more..





http://www.heraldsun.com/pages/full_story/push?article-Hersh-+Military+waging+war+with+White+House%20&id=3974209-Hersh-+Military+waging+war+with+White+House&instance=homethirdleft

Hersh: Military waging war with White House

By Neil Offen , 1 month ago
noffen@heraldsun.com

DURHAM — The U.S. military is not just fighting wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, America’s most renowned investigative journalist says.

The army is also “in a war against the White House — and they feel they have Obama boxed in,” Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter Seymour Hersh told several hundred people in Duke University’s Page Auditorium on Tuesday night. “They think he’s weak and the wrong color. Yes, there’s racism in the Pentagon. We may not like to think that, but it’s true and we all know it.”

In a speech on Obama’s foreign policy, Hersh, who uncovered the My Lai massacre during the Vietnam War and torture at Abu Ghraib prison during the Iraqi war, said many military leaders want Obama to fail.

“A lot of people in the Pentagon would like to see him get into trouble,” he said. By leaking information that the commanding officer in Afghanistan, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, says the war would be lost without an additional 40,000 American troops, top brass have put Obama in a no-win situation, Hersh contended.

“If he gives them the extra troops they’re asking for, he loses politically,” Hersh said. “And if he doesn’t give them the troops, he also loses politically.”

The journalist criticized the president for “letting the military do that,” and suggested the only way out was for Obama to stand up to them.

“He’s either going to let the Pentagon run him or he has to run the Pentagon,” Hersh said. If he doesn’t, “this stuff is going to be the ruin of his presidency.”

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. All of which is disappointing but not really surprising
Candidate Obama was much more decisive than President Obama.

And that's a shame.




TG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. He should replace the sob. Do it with petraus /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HowHasItComeToThis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. RELIEVE HIM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Petraeus is dirty, too. Geezus, aren't any of those general officers clean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Probably, but Petraeus never circumvented his commander and chief /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
24. Betrayus was given that name for a reason...
"Today, Gen. McChrystal is conducting a subtler but equally insubordinate campaign for wider war in Afghanistan, with the backing of CENTCOM commander David Petraeus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #2
37. are you for real?
jesus christ. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
optimator Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. firing is not enough
I may sound like a broken record but this shit McChrystal has done is criminal and a lower enlisted soldier would go to jail.
Obama MUST punish him or its all over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. McChrystal's Pat Tillman Connection

http://www.thenation.com/doc/20090525/zirin2

McChrystal's Pat Tillman Connection

By Dave Zirin

May 13, 2009

When NFL player-turned-Army Ranger Pat Tillman died at the hands of US troops in a case of "friendly fire," the spin machine at the Pentagon went into overdrive. Rumsfeld and company couldn't have their most high-profile soldier dying in such an inelegant fashion, especially with the release of those pesky photos from Abu Ghraib hitting the airwaves. So an obscene lie was told to Tillman's family, his friends and the American public. The chickenhawks in charge, whose only exposure to war was watching John Wayne movies, claimed that he died charging a hill and was cut down by the radical Islamic enemies of freedom. In the weeks preceding his death, Tillman was beginning to question what exactly he was fighting for, telling friends that he believed the war in Iraq was " illegal." He may not have known what he was fighting for, but it's now clear what he died for: public relations. Today, after five years, six investigations and two Congressional hearings, questions still linger about how Tillman died and why it was covered up.


Now the man who greased the chain of command that orchestrated this great deception is prepared to assume total control of US operations in Afghanistan: Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal. It was McChrystal who approved Tillman's posthumous Silver Star, a medal given explicitly for combat, even though he later testified that he "suspected" friendly fire.

Yet despite this, both Democrats and Republicans are rushing to heap praise on McChrystal, including Sen. John McCain. It was McCain who rushed to speak at Tillman's funeral and then, when the cover-up became known, pledged to help the Tillman family expose the truth. McCain later turned his back on the Tillmans when they raised the volume and demanded answers. As Pat's mother, Mary Tillman, said last year, "He definitely eased out of the situation. He didn't blatantly say he wouldn't help us, it's just that it became clear that he kind of drifted away."

And now the Tillman family, amidst bipartisan praise for Obama's new general, must once again raise the inconvenient truth.
Pat's father, Pat Tillman Sr., told the Associated Press, "I do believe that guy participated in a falsified homicide investigation."

..more..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I'm thinking he MIGHT be waiting until he makes his decision, sees how it
turns out (I'm assuming he'll send fewer troops or none at all, please God) -- then have McChrystal 'resign'.

I'd like to see Obama loudly kick some ass, on this issue and on others, but I'm beginning to realize that's not an Obama we're going to see. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. So if McChrystal doesn't go to fail it's all over? What is all over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is not a battle Pres Obama can afford to lose.
I feel sure he must know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. I hope Obama still has his Blackberry
and is aware of the wise advice from people like Sy Hersh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Gen. MacArthur was practically a demigod
by the time that the Korean War broke out, yet Harry Truman decided to take the political risk and remove him from the theater & conduct the war as he saw fit. Gen McChrystal? Nowhere near a demigod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. And Gates has maybe outlived his tenure, too
Edited on Sat Nov-21-09 07:36 PM by chill_wind
Right-wing pressure, including from Robert Gates, the defense secretary Obama kept on from the Bush administration, will not abate. At a press conference yesterday, Gates, who reportedly favors sending 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan made it seem like a foregone conclusion that the President will opt (has opted?) to escalate. He said:

“"I anticipate that as soon as the president makes his decision, we can probably begin flowing some forces pretty quickly after that.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I noticed that also
that's called second guessing your superior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. This world McChrystal continues to 'get his run in daily' remains a very dangerous world...
without doubt *and/or* in spite of their opaque, lesser sense of longitudinal war planning able to point to a conclusion. The careered chiefs all joint or otherwise are performing a lesser service by communicating to the rank in the field, so ineffectively, the ills and trappings of over-the-horizon empire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. you have to consider the author of this piece
Edited on Sat Nov-21-09 10:19 PM by dusmcj

Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington. He was an Army infantry/intelligence officer and then a CIA analyst for 27 years, and is now on the Steering Group of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).


this suggests there is a nonzero probability he is compromised if not coopted. I'm sure that the administration knows that; so should the readership here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. What the Fox!?!
When someone seemingly speaks truth to power, it doesn't count to some here, if it's "a democrat" in the White House.

Please? This rationale is so lame it makes me physically shudder. Ray McGovern has spoken up time and time again ... when it wasn't a feather in his cap (to his personal/professional benefit) to do so.

To many progressives here at DU, Ray McGovern is an American Patriot. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. he was a fierce critic of Bush and gang.
Edited on Sat Nov-21-09 10:33 PM by G_j

A good writer, I think he's proven by now to pretty spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Yes, that's spot on!
Edited on Sat Nov-21-09 10:37 PM by ShortnFiery
Ray McGovern is the opposite of being "co-opted" but a man of moral courage. Given his extensive background in the US Military (Infantry) as well as later within the Intelligence Community, I can only imagine the pressures that he was confronted with to just "go along to get along."

Further, I always enjoy catching him on C-SPAN the few instances he's been on. McGovern is very unassuming and presents his perspectives with both detail and clarity.

p.s. The Phoenix Coyotes won against the Philidelphia Flyers ---> Shoot out! Yea! :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. you need to get over your wish for heroes to adulate or you'll become impotent mutual affirmers
instead, be heroes yourselves - don't trade responsibility for adulation and the comfort of membership in a group which busies itself mutually affirming that it has discovered the truth and doesn't have time to apply it to the outside world.

In this case, Truman would have kicked much of the 'progressive' tribe to the curb as a bunch of softassed pantywaists. He jettisoned MacArthur (himself originally a pantywaist mama's boy from the womb of good society) because Mac challenged civilian leadership of the military, and because Democratic warmaking had a record of success which didn't rely on the jingoism of the Republicans but on a sense of geopolitics which included an understanding of when the use of force was an imperative.

Recent Democratic leadership has not shown itself to be reliably responsible when it comes to objectively assessing such geopolitical imperatives, but instead more concerned with the effects on the electorate of positions taken. Sorry, no cigar. Just as the health care reform question requires that people be ready to sacrifice reelection in order to use the majority WE HAVE to pass real health care reform, foreign policy is even less an electoral popularity contest, and even more a situation in which the right, or at least best, answer, must be found, regardless of how popular that is with the electorate. Most of whom are too ignorant here in the USA to even participate in the discussion, nevermind form an informed opinion. The President, as Clinton before him, seems to be an exception to this situation, both on the ignorance fronts and also in the area of responsibility as a politician, but he has few peers, and instead too many fellows who are more concerned with appearing in media stories than actually contributing to an optimal solution. P - A - N - D - E - R - I - N - G. Regardless of which corner of the electorate is targeted, the behavior is the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #20
39. You simply need to get over yourself.
There's no sense to be made out of your rambling rant above. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. so what
>To many progressives here at DU, Ray McGovern is an American Patriot.

That's not necessarily a recommendation without other evidence to support the suggestion. (Since 'progressive' has grown an unfortunate rind of dogmatic ideological line-toeing reminiscent of a certain party across the aisle, including here.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. There is plenty to read
if you want to look into McGovern's articles etc. I've read enough over the years to find him reliable.
That just might be why he is respected, as opposed to "dogmatic ideological line-toeing reminiscent of a certain party across the aisle"
:thumbsdown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. His body of writing and open public activism
suggests completely otherwise. You almost seem like someone who has never read a thing he's written or heard him speak. How could that be?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
18. MacGlass is breaking the rules
and he should be replaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
23. i wrote to the white house this morning
and suggested just that. fire the bastards who are stabbing him in the back. goodgawd, just let 'em go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. __
:thumbsup:
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
26. So what's it going to be Mr. President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. The solution is 'rope'.
And Obama is letting the general take as much as he needs.

But he better be beware of that sudden stop when he reaches the end of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I hope you are correct! Waiting and watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lebkuchen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
29. The Tilman family begged Obama not to go w/McCrystal
McCrystal is as black-ops (black-oops?) as they come.

Now Obama is stuck with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
30. Obama SHOULD have fired him ...
...the day McChrystal held his first Press Conference
...Unless Obama is just a pawn of Wall Street, The Health Insurance Industry, and the War Profiteers.


The DLC New Team

(Screen Capped from the DLC Website)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #30
36. yikes
that's scary..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
32. Maybe Obama should say Fogh You and yank all funding.. bring the troops home...
..maybe someone in Washington should stand up for main-street America?

Just a crazy thought.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. funding is Congress' job...
the purse-strings thing, you know?

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##



This week is our fourth quarter 2009 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invictus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
38. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
40. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
41. so did Obama cave?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
42. Obama does not have the glands for that. He's like Jimmy Carter without the moral backbone. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC