Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

General Wesley Clark's Advice: Get Out Of Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 11:14 PM
Original message
General Wesley Clark's Advice: Get Out Of Afghanistan
Edited on Fri Nov-20-09 11:15 PM by Dinger
http://www.examiner.com/x-23316-Madison-Independent-Examiner~y2009m11d19-Gen-Wesley-Clarks-advice-Get-out-of-Afghanistan

Retired Gen. Wesley Clark has some advice for Congress: Start planning an exit strategy from Afghanistan.

Speaking to the House Armed Services subcommittee on oversight and investigations, Gen. Clark said, "figure out where you’re going. How do we get out of here? Because our presence long term there is not a good thing. We’re playing into the hands of people who don’t like foreigners in a country that’s not tolerant of diversity. And that’s not going to change.”

It is no surprise that Clark's comments have been ignored by the mainstream media. It seems that most who speak out against the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq are marginalized by the corporate media. But if people who speak out against the wars have credibility, like Gen. Clark, they are completely ignored.

The retired general said he preferred a "minimalist" approach that would subvert Afghan terrorism, as some Democrats, including Vice President Joe Biden, have argued. Biden has asserted that the US should draw down its Afghan military presence and focus on the Taliban, while taking the fight to al Qaeda. Clark emphasized that cannot be accomplished through military strategy alone and that an exit strategy, combined with clear military objectives is the only way for the U.S. to achieve any tangible goals in Afghanistan. And the end goal is to get out of there before it becomes another Vietnam.

- - - - - -


I'm a long time Clark supporter and fan. Please allow me to indulge in posting some Wesley Clark news, especially when it makes sense, a lot of sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm a huge fan of...
...Gen. Wesley Clark. Thanks for posting this. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thank You Yvonne : )
:patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot:

Damn, it feels good to do that again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
optimator Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. a lot of psychological projecting
Clark did not say "get out."
He said an exit strategy before anything else, which is basically the same as Obama.
The only difference is Clark wants to FLUSH trillions more down the toilet on rebuilding Afghanistan, which shows how painfully ignorant he is of our economy/debt.
There is a huge difference between "getting out" and "exit strategy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YvonneCa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Welcome to DU... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yeah, Welcome (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. "Exit" means "leave" and "strategy" means "how do I do it"..
So in my mind "exit strategy" means "how do I leave".

Something that should have been thought of before we ever went in to either Afghanistan or Iraq.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powell_Doctrine

The Powell Doctrine states that a list of questions all have to be answered affirmatively before military action is taken by the United States:

1. Is a vital national security interest threatened?
2. Do we have a clear attainable objective?
3. Have the risks and costs been fully and frankly analyzed?
4. Have all other non-violent policy means been fully exhausted?
5. Is there a plausible exit strategy to avoid endless entanglement?
6. Have the consequences of our action been fully considered?
7. Is the action supported by the American people?
8. Do we have genuine broad international support?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
6. yes sir
I still think Wes Clark would be a very fine president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. : )
:patriot: :patriot: :patriot: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I was a Clark supporter too.
That seems so long ago. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TicketyBoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
9. Did you see Bill Moyers tonight?
Wow. One of the best arguments for withdrawing from Afghanistan I've ever seen. He had actual tapes of phone calls President Johnson made to various individuals (cabinet secretaries, Senators, aides, and friends) when he was trying to figure out what he was going to do in Vietnam.

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/blog/

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/index-flash.html

That program plus the 60 Minutes piece last Sunday which ended with Byron Pitts asking two soldiers what "success" in Afghanistan would consist of. One said, "Getting out of here alive." And the other soldier agreed with him. I told my husband, "Hell, we can do that right now."

http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5658447n&tag=cbsnewsMainColumnArea.5

Those two programs in combination make a compelling reason to withdraw from Afghanistan ASAP.

I hope President Obama comes to the same conclusion I have.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hayu_lol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 03:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Thanks Dinger...
Edited on Sat Nov-21-09 03:33 AM by hayu_lol
We missed a bet with Clark. He had qualifications to back up his words, as well as life experience and education in several fields.

Some of our folks got 'what they wished for.' We all live with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes We Do
Good to "see" ya buddy.:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. Bill Moyers was excellent
as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
12. As someone who has books written by Wes on military strategy,
Congress should heed his advice. He is a deep thinker and assessor when it comes to such matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
15. That's my general!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. I have no idea why he's not being formally consulted?
I think the President should heed Clark's advice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
digidigido Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-21-09 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
17. What do you mean "BEFORE it becomes another Vietnam?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
18. Wes is someone who should be listened to in matters like this.
Edited on Sun Nov-22-09 01:06 AM by Kat45
When did they take the Clark group away? Someone just told me that Wes said this, then I came on to DU to find out more about it, I knew I could find it in the Clark group--and the group wasn't there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yeah, Why Did They Take The Clark Group Away??
Good question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
19. Why isn't Clark
our sec of def.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Because You Have To Be Retired From The Military For 10 Years Before You Can Be
Secretary of Defense. Clark retired in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-22-09 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
22. Too bad the right people aren't listening. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC