Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should we try to respond in kind to the Psalm 109:8 merchandise?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 09:06 PM
Original message
Should we try to respond in kind to the Psalm 109:8 merchandise?
Something like .....


Pray for the Republicans, Luke 23:34




http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+23%3A34&version=KJV


Luke 23:34 (King James Version)

Then said Jesus, Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do. And they parted his raiment, and cast lots.






(Feel free to add your opinion as to what the most appropriate biblical passage might be)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. 1 Samuel 18:25-27 (King James Version)
25And Saul said, Thus shall ye say to David, The king desireth not any dowry, but an hundred foreskins of the Philistines, to be avenged of the king's enemies. But Saul thought to make David fall by the hand of the Philistines.

26And when his servants told David these words, it pleased David well to be the king's son in law: and the days were not expired.

27Wherefore David arose and went, he and his men, and slew of the Philistines two hundred men; and David brought their foreskins, and they gave them in full tale to the king, that he might be the king's son in law. And Saul gave him Michal his daughter to wife.





It has nothing to do with what they have said about Obama, but they will have to explain it to their children in the car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-20-09 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. ROTFLMFAO!
"No, son, the foreskins isn't a sixties band..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC