|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 04:59 PM Original message |
Obama nominates Dana Perino? WTF |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zen Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:00 PM Response to Original message |
1. Okay, so name me a straight-shooting honest Republican. One is as good as another, pretty much. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Scott McClellan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:09 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Good answer...I couldn't think of one. : ) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
68. Yeah, if he was going to appoint ANY of Chimp's former mouthpieces |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DainBramaged (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 07:34 PM Response to Reply #68 |
84. I would give HIM a position in the Administration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
2. LOLOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:22 PM Response to Reply #2 |
49. by nominating a Republican for a Republican slot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:26 PM Response to Reply #49 |
53. The reflexive bashers and whiners and Naderites don't need facts or logic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:34 PM Response to Reply #53 |
65. People have reason to hate her, but everything should be viewed with proportionality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:37 PM Response to Reply #65 |
70. He has to pick a Republican and consult with the Republicans in doing so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:01 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yep, she's one of a group that is always bipartisan: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:02 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. UM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. By law, no more than four members may be from the same political party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:05 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. but DANA FUCKING PERINO? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:08 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. The sitting president typically defers the choice to the opposing party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. What in the hell is that suppose to mean? Way of what? This is a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:16 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. it's apologist thinking, TAAB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:24 PM Response to Reply #17 |
50. Deleted message |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:46 PM Response to Reply #13 |
30. THIS is indisputable evidence that we've FULLY morphed into a RW Duopoly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:25 PM Response to Reply #30 |
51. No, *THIS* is *NOT* indisputable evidence of a duopoly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:54 PM Response to Reply #51 |
74. We disagree. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:15 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. TYPICALLY? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:19 PM Response to Reply #14 |
18. Yeah, but that wouldn't be change I can believe in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:36 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. are you fucking KIDDING??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:52 PM Response to Reply #23 |
34. No, and it's a shame you aren't either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:03 PM Response to Reply #34 |
42. you don't compromise with a rabid dog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:05 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. Skittles, you've become a rabid dog. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:26 PM Response to Reply #44 |
54. Which is why Obama is in the WH and Skittles is banging away in ALL CAPS. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:11 PM Response to Reply #42 |
46. Skittles, you're OK by me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:32 PM Response to Reply #46 |
60. Dennis Kucinich was interested in Ron Paul as his running mate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:33 PM Response to Reply #60 |
62. Ron Paul rawkkks!!!! He's totally better than Obama.!!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 08:55 PM Response to Reply #46 |
92. all I know is we could have done much better than this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CreekDog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:28 PM Response to Reply #23 |
56. More than health care, good picks for the cabinet, appointing good judges? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bikingaz (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 10:49 PM Response to Reply #56 |
95. Too much hyperbole on both sides |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:41 PM Response to Reply #18 |
27. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:03 PM Response to Reply #27 |
43. CREDIT??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
icee2 (261 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:16 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Besides, they both serve the same interest groups |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:05 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. There are tons of republicans other than Dana Fucking Liar Perino nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:27 PM Response to Reply #8 |
20. Not any that were the first woman WH press secretary. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Qutzupalotl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:39 PM Response to Reply #20 |
26. First Republican woman WH press secretary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYCGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:42 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. I stand corrected. Forgot about her. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:35 PM Response to Reply #6 |
22. ok. there are independents, there are other parties. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:42 PM Response to Reply #22 |
29. Each post is subject to Senate confirmation. Trying to do an end run around the bipartisanship |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NRaleighLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:08 PM Response to Original message |
9. Keeping your friends close, but your enemies closer, has a limit. I think this goes beyond it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
36. For whatever reason, people in DC don't seem to hold grudges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
39. But, you see, they are not enemies but rather "fraternity/sorority members" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Laelth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:11 PM Response to Original message |
12. Vomit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walk away (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:16 PM Response to Original message |
15. Isn't she a "low information" type girl? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
19. Don't worry. It's part of a strategy far too fiendishly brilliant for mere mortals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OmmmSweetOmmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 07:10 PM Response to Reply #19 |
79. 10 dimensional chess to the 100th degree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
21. why does it have to bi-partisan? I dont remember any bi-partisanship under the 8 years of Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:37 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. It is bipartisan by law. 4 Dems, 4 Repubs and the Secretary of State. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robinlynne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:50 PM Response to Reply #24 |
31. right. but it says no more than 4 Dems, nothing about needing republicans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:01 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. Yes, he should be ultrapartisan while appointing members of a bipartisan agency. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
25. Affirmative action for very white right wing bimbos |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sakabatou (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
32. WTF?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU GrovelBot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:51 PM Response to Original message |
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ## |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:52 PM Response to Original message |
35. What will her new job entail? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 05:57 PM Response to Original message |
37. That commercial she did won't run forever..she needs a job |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:20 PM Response to Reply #37 |
47. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
38. Deleted message |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
41. Oh for fucks sake ...Kucinich 2012 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:06 PM Response to Reply #41 |
45. Would a President Kucinich sign a Republican bill to overturn health care reform? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 08:26 PM Response to Reply #45 |
90. This government will also never be of, by and for the people either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:20 PM Response to Original message |
48. Ironic that a rape apologist would smear others as 'apologists' for supporting a Democratic Preznit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:30 PM Response to Reply #48 |
57. LOL...stalk much? You do realize how old those threads are? Don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:31 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. If you weren't so gallingly hypocritical as to call anyone who disagrees |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:39 PM Response to Reply #58 |
72. I never called anyone who disagreed with me an apologist. I call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 07:07 PM Response to Reply #72 |
75. Because it's his fault the law says he has to pick a Republican. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
52. "By law, no more than 4 of the 8 members ... appointed by the president can be the president's party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:27 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. So he's not supposed to consult Republicans about which Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:32 PM Response to Reply #55 |
59. & he did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:33 PM Response to Reply #59 |
61. He actually rejected the Republicans' first choice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:34 PM Response to Reply #61 |
64. good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shagbark Hickory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
63. I'm just waiting for this guy to unzip his skin and watch GW Bush climb out of the costume. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:35 PM Response to Reply #63 |
66. If you actually read the post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:36 PM Response to Reply #66 |
69. I doubt it. The Obama=Bush people have the reading comprehension |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek tragedy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:35 PM Response to Reply #63 |
67. Is that snark or just raw stupidity and ignorance? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:39 PM Response to Reply #67 |
71. They're not mutually exclusive, of course. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 06:45 PM Response to Reply #71 |
73. snarstupignance? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 07:08 PM Response to Reply #73 |
77. Absosmurfly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
76. She may be a blatant liar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 08:03 PM Response to Reply #76 |
86. Good points - that could be the strategy. I just remember yelling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
varelse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 07:09 PM Response to Original message |
78. Why appoint an idiot? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
80. Gotta keep her off of Faux Snooze somehow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 08:04 PM Response to Reply #80 |
87. My thoughts exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
81. How dare he pick a Republican!11!1!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 07:31 PM Response to Reply #81 |
83. Don't expect people to actually look up the facts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 07:50 PM Response to Reply #83 |
85. And even if they looked them up, some would still complain. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Number23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 10:04 PM Response to Reply #83 |
94. Gone beyone kneejerking. One person has called Perino a "whore" twice in this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mamaleah (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 10:56 PM Response to Reply #94 |
98. Yes proving that again, sexism is not off the table around here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thickasabrick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 08:05 PM Response to Reply #81 |
88. I stated in my post that I understood it had to be someone outside |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starbucks Anarchist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 08:17 PM Response to Reply #88 |
89. So who's your choice? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tnlefty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 08:50 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. John Dean? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 08:55 PM Response to Reply #81 |
93. repuke is one thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
82. Oh Gawd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
96. I'm sure this is related to 9 level chess or 12 level checkers or whatever the fuck it is ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
97. she'll fit right in. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 11:09 PM Response to Original message |
99. ugh...I got to give Obama the benefit of the doubt and assume |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marlakay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-19-09 11:12 PM Response to Original message |
100. Maybe their thinking if they give her a job she will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC