Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Africa population tops a billion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 03:28 PM
Original message
Africa population tops a billion
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/8366591.stm

The number of people in Africa has passed the one billion mark, the UN Population Fund says in a report.

"Africa countries are all growing fast... because there is large number of women who have no access to planning their families," she said.

"It's an African phenomenon of a large growing population and a large percentage of young people in the population," she told the BBC's Network Africa programme.

In its State of the World Report, the UNPF says the world's population currently stands at about 6.8 billion. Africa's population is estimated to reach 1.9 billion by 2050, it says.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. 1.9 billion in 40 years?
Population growth world-wide, not just in Africa, is frightening.

:scared:

What is the carrying capacity of planet Earth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Less than are here now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. We wouldn't have as many people as we do if it couldn't carry us
Edited on Wed Nov-18-09 03:40 PM by The2ndWheel
Though we only have this many people because we manipulate the circumstances so much. So, there will be less of something, somewhere, if there are more of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Carrying Capacity:
(emphasis added)

Carrying capacity


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The carrying capacity of a biological species in an environment is the population size of the species that the environment can sustain indefinitely, given the food, habitat, water and other necessities available in the environment. For the human population, more complex variables such as sanitation and medical care are sometimes considered as part of the necessary infrastructure.

As population density increases, birth rate often increases and death rate typically decreases. The difference between the birth rate and the death rate is the "natural increase". The carrying capacity could support a positive natural increase, or could require a negative natural increase. Thus, the carrying capacity is the number of individuals an environment can support without significant negative impacts to the given organism and its environment. Below carrying capacity, populations typically increase, while above, they typically decrease. A factor that keeps population size at equilibrium is known as a regulating factor. Population size decreases above carrying capacity due to a range of factors depending on the species concerned, but can include insufficient space, food supply, or sunlight. The carrying capacity of an environment may vary for different species and may change over time due to a variety of factors, including: food availability, water supply, environmental conditions and living space.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrying_capacity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. "Though we only have this many people because we manipulate the circumstances so much."
Our population size hasn't been sustainable for a long time. If we stopped manipulating the circumstances in which we live, we wouldn't have this many people. Since we won't stop doing that voluntarily, we're going to force our environment to conform to our size, to whatever end that may lead to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Well . . .
You have to take into account that we are living on deficit spending of the environment; literally living on oil and other natural resources that are finite. Oil is running out as are many other resources that are being used far faster than they can be replaced by natural cycles. I shudder to think of the consequences of that eventual occurrence. That's why I said we're exceeding our carrying capacity. It's working (very sort of) now, but it's like taking money out of the bank way faster than it's being replenished. Eventually it's gone and then what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Absolutely
We just wouldn't have almost 7 billion people today if we couldn't have almost 7 billion people today. We keep making it possible to have this many people, regardless of the overall cost, because what else are we going to do? Every institution we've built is designed to allow more people to do more things. When we can't have this many people, we won't have this many people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. I read somewhere...
That Africa was not densely populated, given its size. That was only a few years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC