Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Audit The Fed Effort Under Threat In House (due to Sleazy Corporate Dem)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 02:41 PM
Original message
Audit The Fed Effort Under Threat In House (due to Sleazy Corporate Dem)
Edited on Wed Nov-18-09 02:44 PM by FLAprogressive
A bipartisan effort to force transparency on the Federal Reserve is suddenly in jeopardy after a House Financial Services Committee member introduced an amendment that would let the multi-trillion dollar organization continue throwing tax dollars around in secret.

Rep. Mel Watt, a Democrat from North Carolina, has introduced an amendment intended as an alternative to the measure to audit the Federal Reserve introduced by Reps. Ron Paul (R-Texas) and Alan Grayson's (D-Fla.) . But instead of increasing transparency, as the amendment claims to do, Watt's measure would instead make the institution more opaque.

(Alan Grayson's take on this bullshit:) "The Watt Amendment, as written today, actually places new restrictions on the little authority that exists, such as it is, for independent auditing of the Fed," Grayson said. "It keeps in place all existing restrictions and adds four more. So I don't see why anybody would reasonably think that it creates unprecedented authority to audit the Fed."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/17/audit-the-fed-effort-unde_n_361389.html

----

so how much money has Watt taken from banks?

http://www.opensecrets.org/politicians/industries.php?cycle=Career&type=I&cid=N00002328&newMem=N&recs=20

Over $300,000 in his career....his top donor base is banks.

This guy is sleazy and needs to be replaced by a real Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Perhaps Watt could more accurately be characterized as D-Bank of America. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. I thought Grayson said that he and Paul had over 200 co-sponsors
Why is this thing still sitting in committee subject to this BS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. because Mel Watt inserted his own BS into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC