Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rage Grows in America: Anti-Government Conspiracies (ADL takes on Glenn beck)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 08:20 PM
Original message
Rage Grows in America: Anti-Government Conspiracies (ADL takes on Glenn beck)
Since the election of Barack Obama as president, a current of anti-government hostility has swept across the United States, creating a climate of fervor and activism with manifestations ranging from incivility in public forums to acts of intimidation and violence.

What characterizes this anti-government hostility is a shared belief that Obama and his administration actually pose a threat to the future of the United States. Some accuse Obama of plotting to bring socialism to the United States, while others claim he will bring about Nazism or fascism. All believe that Obama and his administration will trample on individual freedoms and civil liberties, due to some sinister agenda, and they see his economic and social policies as manifestations of this agenda. In particular anti-government activists used the issue of health care reform as a rallying point, accusing Obama and his administration of dark designs ranging from “socialized medicine” to “death panels,” even when the Obama administration had not come out with a specific health care reform plan. Some even compared the Obama administration’s intentions to Nazi eugenics programs.

Some of these assertions are motivated by prejudice, but more common is an intense strain of anti-government distrust and anger, colored by a streak of paranoia and belief in conspiracies. These sentiments are present both in mainstream and “grass-roots” movements as well as in extreme anti-government movements such as a resurgent militia movement. Ultimately, this anti-government anger, if it continues to grow in intensity and scope, may result in an increase in anti-government extremists and the potential for a rise of violent anti-government acts.

Part One: Anger in the Mainstream
The Tea Parties
The rapid growth of anti-government anger in the wake of Obama’s election first became apparent in the spring of 2009, when conservative groups and grass-roots activists organized a nationwide series of anti-government rallies dubbed “Tea Parties.” At these events, and later sequels, anti-government sentiments and conspiracy theories proliferated, with a common theme being that somehow Obama had “stolen” the country from Americans.

The Town Hall Meeting Disruptions
More evidence of anti-government animosity appeared in the summer of 2009, when a variety of anti-government protests and disruptions occurred at town hall meetings organized by senators and representatives across the country to discuss healthcare reform. These events became a fertile ground for anti-Obama protests and stunts, with some protesters angrily launching verbal attacks against the president as well as other officeholders. A number of protests explicitly compared the Obama administration and its policies to Nazi Germany and the Holocaust.

http://www.adl.org/special_reports/rage-grows-in-America/default.asp



The most important mainstream media figure who has repeatedly helped to stoke the fires of anti-government anger is right-wing media host Glenn Beck, who has a TV show on FOX News and a popular syndicated radio show. While other conservative media hosts, such as Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity, routinely attack Obama and his administration, typically on partisan grounds, they have usually dismissed or refused to give a platform to the conspiracy theorists and anti-government extremists. This has not been the case with Glenn Beck. Beck and his guests have made a habit of demonizing President Obama and promoting conspiracy theories about his administration.

On a number of his TV and radio programs, Beck has even gone so far as to make comparisons between Hitler and Obama and to promote the idea that the president is dangerous.


http://www.adl.org/special_reports/rage-grows-in-America/mainstream-media.asp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is what Sarah Palin has done to us. Thanks, John McCain,
for selling your soul and all your principles. The fringe had taken over the asylum, sad to say.

He could have run a straight-up, honorable, policy-based campaign. But, NO......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Very, very interesting.
The right is really showing how extreme they are. I wonder if it will be enough to turn away some of those pot-smoking Libertarians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. the attempt to associate Obama with fascism ought to anger any Jew
at least any one who knows any history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. So true, but Eric Cantor seems mildly amused not outraged at Rush Limbaugh
Edited on Wed Nov-18-09 01:30 AM by DainBramaged
“Do I condone the mention of Hitler in any discussion about politics?” Cantor said. “No, I don’t, because obviously that is something that conjures up images that frankly are not, I think, very helpful.”

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&sid=atp35nQZ_S44






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. How do you interpret that statement as "mild amusement?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Do you think it's even close to the description of anger? I don't.
Eric Cantor is a disgrace, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I don't see it as anger, but it is a far cry from "amusement."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Are you defending the actions of Eric Cantor?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. No. Challenging your assertion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. My assertion is he is a clown, plain and simple and ALL of his actions
are indefensible. You want to quibble of my assertion he isn't serious, fine. Get in line with all of us who think he is unfit for Political office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Changing the posts?
I disagree with your assessment of his remarks. You seem to mistakenly think it means something else and follow the credo; "you are either with us, or with the terrorists."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Interesting your choice of words.......
When it comes to the Republicans, who have NO qualms about using racist symbolism to denigrate one of us or OUR President, they are only there for the sound bite or photo op, not to defend the Jewish faith or chastise their own for using racist symbols.


Eric Cantor is a piece of shit, that's about as plain as I can describe him, and I PERSONSLLY feel he isn't serious AT ALL in defending his own faith or chastising those using Nazi symbolism to attack President Obama. NO ONE who resides on this board should defend him or his remarks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I don't see anyone defending him or his remarks.
All I see is a poster who has wrapped himself in poorly chosen words and now can't understand the progress of the sub-thread. Perhaps you should start again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Actually, it should anger anyone with a sense of ethics and knowledge of history.
Fascism in Italy and Germany destroyed millions of lives and countries. To banter about the word as if it were just another word is where people start to falter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. agreed (it should anger everyone)
I guess on the one hand I'm calling out some of our neocon friends, and on the other I could understand a special outrage at having frequently personal history diluted by our local ignorami - I view it as being particularly an affront to those who suffered most from fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Thank. You made some great comments...
...one was predictive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-18-09 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
10. Yet they had no problem at all with Bush.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC