Sen. Sherrod Brown: 'Where Was The Compromise From Their Side?'

[babylonsister]

http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/sen-sherrod-brown-where-was-compromis


Sen. Sherrod Brown: 'Where Was The Compromise From Their Side?'
By Susie Madrak Tuesday Nov 17, 2009 1:00pm


So Harry Reid's holding firm - for now. And you just can't argue with Sherrod Brown: What concessions have the ConservaDems made?

The Senate majority leader, Harry Reid of Nevada, met on Monday night with a group of liberal Senate Democrats who urged Mr. Reid not to back down from his decision to put a government-run insurance plan, or public option, in the major health care legislation that he is working to finalize.

<...> “I don’t think in the end, anybody here in our caucus wants to be on the wrong side of history, wants to kill on a procedural motion, something as important as this,” Mr. Brown said. “It’s the most important thing they ever will have voted on except perhaps the Iraq war.”

Mr. Brown, who is a member of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, which included a public plan in its version of the health care legislation, said that liberals had already given a lot of ground, starting with their willingness to give up a fully government-run single-payer system, which many favor.

“A large number of people in this country including many, many doctors wanted Medicare for all,” he said. “That didn’t happen. Then we wanted a strong public option tied to Medicare rates. Then we wanted a public option building the Medicare network. That didn’t happen. Now we are saying public option coming out of the HELP Committee. And now we’re saying public option with the state opt-out. Where was the compromise coming from their side?”

[HughBeaumont]

1. MY Senator knows his shit.

He sees these bought-and-paid-for lapdogs for who they really are - tools for Beeg Insurance.

[FarPoint]

6. I foresee Sherrod Brown to

fill the empty shoes of Senator Kennedy.O8)

[msongs]

2. hey man, Obama prefers bipartisanship. get with the program nt

[Thrill]

4. Bipartisanship means getting the Democrats on board. Not Republicans

I don't know why people can't see that. They know no Republicans are going to vote for it.

[AllentownJake]

3. Ask your President

He's the one who called their bluff when they were holding a 2 7 offsuit.

[Captain Hilts]

5. BINGO. nt

[Thrill]

7. Everyone wants an all inclusive Democratic Party. This is what you get. Conservative Dems

who are basically Republicans. The price Democrats always pay when they have the majority

[JoeyT]

8. Who knows

They might have made some compromises. Who knows what kind of insane demands they started with.
I doubt it, though.