Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, what if the military requires you to be able to do the job?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 05:19 PM
Original message
So, what if the military requires you to be able to do the job?
I keep seeing these reports of women who now have kids, or are pregnant and can no longer do the job the military wants them to do?
Then it would be fair for the military to decline to accept women because there is the possibility the women won't be able to do the job when the time comes. That's fair right?
Women are already told that if they are going to have kids they will have to have someone else take care of them, and that isn't happening.
Since people are going to the military and asking " may I please join?" , the military should be able to make some requirements, like being able to to the job they volunteered for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. "the job they volunteered for"
I thought they are compensated with wages and benefits, as with any other job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. I like mine with extra butter...
:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost-in-FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Forget popcorn.
:beer: :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. You think the best option is to deny women from serving?
Do you support discriminating against all women because they have the ability to get pregnant?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Should men be allowed to leave because they become dads?
The fact that men are forced to leave when they are about to become fathers is not given any consideration at all none. Get a girl pregnant and want to stay home for the birth of your child? Too fucking bad. You are the one who signed up, get your shit and get on the truck.And don't whine about it.


It isn't like pregnancy is caused by drinking the wrong water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Do you think women should be barred from service?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Nope.
I think they should be required to honor the deal they asked to be a part of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm sorry, it is clearly reasonable to give a single mother with a 12 month old child
Edited on Tue Nov-17-09 05:26 PM by arcadian
a stateside assignment where she can be with her child. What the fuck has happened to reason in this country? Would it be that big a deal to give her an assignment like that? Pleeeze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. ???
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarfarerBill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. So the US military will have to enter the 21st Century...
...and make allowances for parents who don't have other options for their kids when the parents are deployed.

Hell, the military should be grateful that the Bush/Republican economic implosion has created so many "volunteers"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. I have a good feeling about this thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. I agree completely - and I'd add
that the US military should stop accepting men also, since they too can become single parents.

That would solve a whole lot of the world's problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. If men are fathers it totally irrelevant to the military.
Edited on Tue Nov-17-09 07:23 PM by Tim01
"Your wifes about to give birth? Sucks to be you, get on the truck."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Perhaps you should think your OP then so it doesn't sound so sexist.
"reports of women who now have kids, ... and can no longer do the job the military wants them to do"

Sounded like you were talking about single parents, and surely you realize men can be single parents, too, right?

Perhaps you should have left that out if what you really meant was that women shouldn't be hired in critical jobs because they have the POTENTIAL to get pregnant.

(Hello, 1950's).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. The military should only recruit homosexuals. This way they won't have kids to be burdened with.
Either that, recruit only single people with no kids and have them steralized when they get their shots at boot camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Google "Sacred Band of Thebes"
an ancient all-gay elite fighting force. The theory behind it was that a man would rather die than be disgraced in the eyes of his lover.

Way to turn DADT on its head, Dave! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hell, why are we still using humans?
Droids don't have personal lives.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. We're getting there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I bet you'd never catch one of those crying or having PMS.
Stupid girls. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mn9driver Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
17. The Army is pretty obviously making an example of this unfortunate woman and her child.
Many years ago when I was in the Navy, one of the female sailors in our squadron showed up for a deployment pregnant. She was left behind. The next time we deployed, a half dozen showed up pregnant. It wasn't too long before the Navy made it a court martial offense to get pregnant "with the intent of avoiding deployment orders".

I have no idea if anyone was ever successfully prosecuted for it, but there were some OTH discharges as a result. This soldier may have really made a good faith effort to find care for her child, just as some of those female sailors may actually have just gotten pregnant at the worst time unintentionally. Once they decide to hang you out, it doesn't matter--you're toast. Putting the kid in foster care is pretty darn harsh, though. Admin discipline and an OTH is the more sensible course, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC