Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lugar defends Hamilton as judicial pick

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 08:48 PM
Original message
Lugar defends Hamilton as judicial pick
WASHINGTON -- Sen. Richard Lugar defended Indiana Judge David Hamilton on Monday against criticism from fellow GOP senators that Hamilton is outside the mainstream.

The Senate is expected to vote Tuesday on whether to prevent a GOP filibuster of President Barack Obama's nomination of Hamilton to the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The court is the last stop before the Supreme Court for cases from Indiana, Illinois and Wisconsin.

Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, the top Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Hamilton's nomination should be stopped because he's used his position as a federal district judge “to drive a political agenda.”

But Lugar, R-Ind., said a closer look at Hamilton's record shows he has not been a judicial activist and “has ruled objectively and within the judicial mainstream.”

http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20091116/NEWS02/911160361/1025/rss02
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. One of the few sane rethug voices, unlike Sessions. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
creeksneakers2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
2.  After all the squawk Republicans made about filibustering
judicial nominees, calling it unconstitutional, they are now doing the same thing.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=120482368
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Upper down vote! Upper down vote!
Will of the people! Majority rules! Uh, terrorists! National security! Something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC