Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Posing Nude Considered Porn? Sarah Palin Thinks So.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
romantico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:03 PM
Original message
Is Posing Nude Considered Porn? Sarah Palin Thinks So.
Levi posing for PLAYGIRL MAGAZINE.Does anyone consider this porn? Sarah Palin told Oprah it was. I think someone needs to show Sarah some porn so she knows what she is talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, how about her new best friend Carrie Prejean??? Are her
posing and doing her thing okay?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Time for a mudwrestling fight to the death. The survivor gets to have Gawd on her side.
Then and only then will we know the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. is posing nekkid for a porn mag, porn?
I'm going with, yes by definition
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I guess the question is "What is PORN?"
People naked -- hell, just sounds like a Saturday night in the hot tub. But once you get into photos of the actual act of sexual intercourse, the close-ups, the splooge shots, the pink -- now you're talking PORN. Now, I haven't seen a Playboy or a Playgirl lately, but last I did it was laughable to call either of them "porn." They're 90% text with some very tame (comparatively) artful nude shots. If you wanted "porn," you bought Hustler. Now that's some rude shit!

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. If you want to look at it again in 15 minutes and 15 minutes after that...it's porn.
n.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. it's porn
when the actual sex acts are shown, it is referred to as hardcore porn

softcore depicts nekkid people, but not actually in flagrante delicto, so to speak.

of course, this is a semantical wank, but it is generally accepted what porn is, playgirl IS porn, and that's that.

in the internet age where some really hardcore porn (or PR0N ) is just a click away, playgirl etc may seem quaint. and in a sense... they are

but they are still porn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. So says you. And I don't agree.
Therein lies the problem. Therein is why there is a problem in the first place.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. so says common usage for decades
but don't let facts get in the way.

do i need to show you that, for example, legal documents have referred to nudie magazines as "porn(ography)"?

according to the 1986 attorney general commission, pornography is : "predominantly sexually explicit and intended primarily for the purpose of sexual arousal."

do you deny that playgirl (and playboy) meet that definition?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. "nudie magazines" isn't a legal term. And Playboy absolutely does NOT fit the definition
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 08:36 PM by Atman
Any Playboy I ever read -- and I read a ton of 'em -- featured about 85% text: fiction (mostly non-sexual; Playboy even sponsors annual College Fiction contests which launched several notable authors) and news and music reviews and movie reviews. The first pictorial of mostly non-full-frontal models was about five pages. The main feature, the "Playmate," was about ten. The back third of the magazine was usually a tame compilation, like "Girls of the Car Wash" or "Girls of the Top Ten." Again, the vast majority of Playboy is pop-culture pap, not unlike GQ or Vanity Fair. They just put some "Page 3" girls in between the articles, which, btw, British papers have been doing for years.

Playboy is to porn what Hanna Barbera is to Hentai.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. i am well aware that nudie magazines
is not a legal term. i am also aware that , legally speaking, both playboy and playgirl are considered sexually explicit materials

the fact that playgirl and playboy have very good articles, and even that the bulk of their pages is not devoted to nude pictures, does not render them not pornographic.

here's the simplest test.

most states have a law making it illegal to disseminate pornography to a minor

so, are you actually arguing that if you gave copies of playgirl to a bunch of under 18 yo boys, that you would be immune from prosecution because playgirl is not pornography? good luck on that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Dude, why would you give a copy of Playgirl to a bunch of underage boys?
Sure...I'd have you checked out. But it would have nothing to do with the otherwise tame content of the magazine.

You seem to be confusing your own, uh...confusion...with the definition of pornography.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. did i say "heterosexual boys"
don't make assumptions. either way, it's still disseminating porn to a minor, whether it's playgirl or playboy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TroglodyteScholar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Google "softcore porn"
You will find pictures of naked people simply being naked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. "not that there's anything wrong with that"
:) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
romantico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I
I do not consider PLAYGIRL a porn magazine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. If a 15 year old girl takes a topless picture of herself
is that porn?

:shrug:

A lot of Americans automatically equate nudity with pornography.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wait until she finds out that Playgirl is also very popular gay "porn."
So Levi is a gay porn star. Fuckin' awesome. Except for most of those I know in the gay community wouldn't be able to get wood looking at ANY Palin -- even "tanned, bare-chested Todd" holding young Twig. Er, Fig. Whatever.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacoD Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. Wikipedia thinks it is
"Johnston will also be featured in a full-frontal nude photo shoot for Playgirl, an online pornographic magazine."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levi_Johnston
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-17-09 12:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
30. And who writes wikipedia?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. definition: pornography: creative activity (writing or pictures or films etc.)
pornography: creative activity (writing or pictures or films etc.) of no literary or artistic value other than to stimulate sexual desire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Of course
Playgirl may be light porn, but it's porn. Sure, artists have had nudes pose probably from the time pigments were around, and therefore porn has been around. I suppose you could try and define porn to be a bit more precisely, but I think most people think that if it has the intent to titillate, even mildly, it can be called porn. Obscenity has a much tighter description and I think Playgirl is way below that threshhold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Strangely... My Jr. College Thought So In The 70's...
The art classes: drawing, painting, sculpting, etc. could use live nude models in the classroom.

Not so the Photography classes, which had just landed in their new digs after a half a million dollar upgrade from their old department.

Never quite understood the logic, but there it was...

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. If the intent of the nudity is to cause fappery, then yes it is.
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 07:19 PM by LostInAnomie
If that's just a latent by-product, then no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. Sarah doesn't think it's porn, Sarah is busy spinning Levi into a deluded teen
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 07:25 PM by Stevenmarc
Then she came in with her whole, poor Levi I hope he comes to his senses, schtick to elevate her above the mess. It's calculated and contrived and will play well to her base who will look at her as warm and forgiving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
14. It IS porn!
Any time the naked body is shown, it is porn! Especially if it is in a magazine! If God had wanted us to be naked, he wouldn't have invented clothes! Not only is PLAYGIRL porn, but so is NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC! I have never seen so many naked breasts in my life! PORN!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Thank you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Hey... I Was Born In A State Of Porn...
I believe some family member has photos.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. national geographic's intent is to stimulate sexual desire? nt
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 09:47 PM by seabeyond
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
22. So she considers what self-righeous Carrie Prejean
has done is porn. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
29. Some say: Parading around stage in a bathing suit so people can examine you is obscene
So that could be categorized as porn, too.

Some say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC