Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Holder dials back his commitment to pushing ban on assault weapons

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
-..__... Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:04 PM
Original message
Holder dials back his commitment to pushing ban on assault weapons
It was bound to happen; someone in the Administration woke up and realized that any attempt at a renewed AWB just isn't worth the effort or consequences.

Now... maybe if a few of the bug-eyed hand wringers in Congress will get the message as well, we can put and end to this nonsense.



Attorney General Eric Holder is retreating on his commitment to pursue a controversial gun-control measure.

Holder’s statements, recently delivered to senators in writing, clearly indicate the Obama administration is in no rush to reinstate the assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004.

In response to written questions from Senate Judiciary Committee members, Holder adopted a much different tone on the ban than he did in February, when he said, “As President Obama indicated during the campaign, there are just a few gun-related changes that we would like to make, and among them would be to reinstitute the ban on the sale of assault weapons.”

That comment attracted many headlines, but the nation’s chief law enforcement officer is now downplaying his earlier remarks.



8<--------- Snip


Regarding the administration’s next step, Holder stated, "The department is currently reviewing existing gun laws to determine how best to combat gun violence and keep guns out of the hands of criminals and others prohibited from possessing them."

Holder's response to Coburn is the latest in a series of mixed messages from Obama and his team after the president vowed during his campaign that he would seek to reinstate the ban.



Complete article...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like someone finally read the latest polls on the subject
and decided he might actually want to get reelected in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. In all fairness, it didn't stop Clinton from getting re-elected in 1996...
...but it sure made Congress a lot harder to get along with in 1994 and beyond.

Actions do have consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benEzra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. It might have, had the Bobdole unit not decided to carpet-bomb gun owners
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 08:00 PM by benEzra
and essentially me-too the Clinton/DLC/Third Way position on guns.

The NRA's slogan that year was "Elect a Clinton-Proof Congress." They pointedly refused to endorse Dole, considering him no better than Clinton on the issue (which was IMO an accurate assessment).

Gun owners made big gains in both houses of Congress in '96, and in both parties, IIRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. At last a backpedal I approve of NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. One of the few sensible things he has done....................n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC