Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Morons at FDL Compare Obama to Herbert Hoover

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 01:12 PM
Original message
Morons at FDL Compare Obama to Herbert Hoover
Bob Cesca comments:

Comparing the president to Hoover is one of the reasons why the Democratic leadership tends to ignore the activist left as being whiny and unserious. And, personally, I'm fed up with being ignored because some of us can't apply pressure without coming off as unreasonable assholes.


http://www.bobcesca.com/blog-archives/2009/11/hoover_seriousl.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Craftsman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. If the economy does not improve you will hear that alot next year
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 01:15 PM by Craftsman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. We hear he was born in Kenya a lot too.
Doesn't make it any more intelligent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. +100.
Stupidity is not limited to the other side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama and his corporatist Admin are out of touch with most Americans
Instead of kissing Wall Street's a@@, Obama should be kicking them in the butt, but no, Obama has got Geither protecting Wall Street's obscene bonuses, yet won't do much to help ordinary Americans. The stimulus package was too little and almost half was tax cuts, which don't stimulate the economy. The Unemployment rate is rising and Obama stares at it like a deer in the headlights.

We needed Obama to be FDR, not Grover Clevland, a pro-corporate Dem of his Day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Amen to that.

It's past time to hold his feet to the fire. This "It's only been 11 months" routine is getting old. Before you know it, you'll be saying "It's only been 47 months." Don't wait.

It's time to let him know what you want him to do and inform him that he will not get your vote again unless he accomplishes most of what you want. Remind him of his campaign promises as applicable.

Send FAXes and make phone calls. They get more attention. You can e-mail, too, but don't rely on just e-mail for contacting anyone in D.C.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
58. Thats how I'm reading it too.
At least there are no failed Wall Street Bankers in the unemployment lines.

We should be happy for them. :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. Thank you for your concern trolling.
Now please either check back in to reality, or don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
56. There was neither concern nor trolling in the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. The point was about not making bold enough changes despite good intentions.
It's saying Hoover cared about the people but used a business-sided approach to fixing economic problems.

I personally don't know a whole lot about Hoover, but I'm gonna start reading up on him because I have no idea if this is true or how true it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. "a business-sided approach to fixing economic problems."
Hoover's problem was that he didn't bail out the banks. He let them fail.

That's the same thing these buffoons are criticizing Obama for not doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Hoover's big mistake was letting the banks fail and the finance system collapse.
Exactly what the people calling Obama 'Hoover' wanted to happen in late 2008.

Which is another way to say that these people are morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Hoover let the banks fail, cut spending to balance the budget and signed Smoot/Hawley.
FDR when he became president took steps to stabilize the banking system, used deficit spending to spur the economy and got around Smoot/Hawley by signing trade deals with other countries and lowering the tariff itself.

So far Obama had done nothing that Hoover did. One could say that Obama is not FDR (who else has been?), but he has more in common with him than he does with Hoover.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. (According to Michele Bachmann it's "Hoot/Smally")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
47. Carrie Prejean heard her say, "Hoot/Smally," and that's why she got implants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Eh
I am pretty sure that it was Hoover's absurd attatchment to Coolidge's Lasseiz Faire capitalism in general that exasperated economic problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. According to this article, Hoover's
plan of action was to shore up the banks and let human capital survive on it's own.

"Meanwhile, the RFC was derided by populist critics as “bank relief” and “a millionaire’s dole”—criticisms echoed today by all those who see George W. Bush’s Troubled Asset Relief Program and Obama’s own Public-Private Investment Program as outrageous giveaways. And, as Kennedy points out, once Hoover had set in motion the great bank bailout of 1931, he “had given up the ground of high principle” and “implicitly legitimated the claims of other sectors for federal assistance.” Critics raised the same criticisms they would raise about Obama’s bailout plans seventy-eight years later. If the banks get a bailout, why not everyone else? Were bailouts only for the rich?"

http://www.harpers.org/archive/2009/07/0082562

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. "The great bank bailout of 1931."
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 02:53 PM by geek tragedy
The Great Depression started in 1929.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. I thought Bush was Hoover and Obama was FRD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. sadly no, although some still have Hope
me? I paid attention when he appointed Geithner and Summers. That wasn't a fluke. As much as I am moved by the Obama narrative, and respect his intelligence and character, I am no longer a believer in the Hope dope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. "without coming off as unreasonable assholes." Uh, 'scuse me?
We're painted as such regardless of how we present it.

That's like worrying about how the r/w is going to respond to any Democratic issue; they'll paint it as "evil" regardless.

Anything that questions the status quo is labeled unreasonable and/or "evil" and its proponents labeled the same. It comes from both sides and it's fucking old.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. The charge becomes stronger when objectively true. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Define "objective."
I'm amazed at how that word is thrown around as though the person using it doesn't have an agenda and that the person with a differing viewpoint does.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. Exactly
All this rhetoric is going to come back to bite us in the next elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. They don't want you to drop your pom pom's at this point
How dare we not be happy with the status quo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I've never owned pom poms.
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 02:10 PM by Cerridwen
I've also never benefited to any great degree from the status quo and I can sure as shit commiserate with those who've "benefited" even less.

They can shove their pom poms up their status quo.

edited for a whole word phrase. LOL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. Exactly n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Oh, the cheerleader reference--the favorite cliche of Obama-hating
leftwing Teabaggers.

How very original.

Go ahead, make a 'cultist' reference. I mean, it's what your allies on the right do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. Project, much?
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 03:02 PM by Cerridwen
Where was President Obama's name even mentioned in the post to which you replied or the subsequent posts, for that matter?

Some of us are quite capable of seeing this as an ongoing "battle" between the "haves and have-nots."

Check my sigline. Grab a clue. A hold your jerking knee.

eta: spelling, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. The usual suspects here refer to anyone who supports
Obama as a 'cheerleader.'

If you think that it's stupid to compare Obama to Herbert Hoover, for instance, you're a cheerleader in their eyes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. 'Kaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
"If you think that it's stupid to compare Obama to Herbert Hoover," you could of course provide some input as to why that comparison does or doesn't work -or- you could just call 'em a "cheerleader" or "hater" -or- you could not engage -or- you could find some other way to respond -or- ...

Yeah, I know, it's "the internets" and "that's just the way it is" and to expect otherwise would just, ya know, maybe change something; but, let's not change anything and just accept that "that's just the way it is."

*sigh*



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. Herbert Hoover sat on his ass for two years after the start
of the Great Depression. Two years.

That alone makes the comparison completely idiotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Thank you.
I've not formed a solid opinion about the current admin.'s actions. I do continually wonder how putting in charge, or retaining, those who were present for events which launched the current economic conditions can now work to change the conditions which they didn't prevent last time.

Can you explain the logic? It doesn't make sense to me.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. The problem is that the only people you're going to find
who know how those institutions function on an intimate basis are those who had a role in operating them or regulating them in the first place.

It's a general dynamic of outsider vs insider. The outsider will have a fresh perspective and will be able to challenge unhealthy orthodoxies and false assumptions.

However, it takes an insider to work within institutions to make them work better.

JFK, a relative outsider, got the ball rolling (as far as the federal legislative response is concerned) on civil rights, but it was LBJ--the classic insider--who actually got legislation through the Congress that had blocked such legislation for decades.

It sounds very attractive to just say "screw the banks" and approach a blunt, brute force attack on them. But, that's not how you treat a tumor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. My computer's acting up. I'll get back with you later. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. I have noticed that you are all over every thread
that dare question some of Obama's policy decisions, rabidly defending everything he does, all the while disparaging those who have problems with the decisions of his administration. You used the word cultist not me, but there is plenty of evidence to support it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. There's plenty to criticize.
But, there's policy criticism and then there's criticism motivated by partisan hostility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
14. As a friend said,
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 02:09 PM by blindpig
"Obama needed to be an FDR but he's Silent Cal with a LBJ foreign policy."

"The business of America is business."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
25. You should get smarter, more literate friends. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Doubt that

That statement was dead on, only the willfully deluded could deny it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. I agree with Geek.
Your friend's a fucking moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Willfully deluded=99% of the population that rejects Karl Marx as the Messiah.
I must have missed Cal Coolidge's $787 Billion stimulus package. Or Obama's deployment of 500,000 US troops after staging a Gulf of Tonkin false flag operation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Hey, there's more than 1% celebrating cinco de Mayo n/t
I wonder if some of the DUers upset with the stimulus bill are in the camp that wanted to see $10,000 per household instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #34
46. Such confusion
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 04:25 PM by blindpig
Just cause you got a Messiah doesn't mean I've got metaphysical delusions. Just an utterly rational tool for understanding things.

The point, Your Obtuseness, is that the administration is quite obviously putting business interest before the needs of the mass of citzenry, where are the jobs, where is the health care? How many jobs have that $787 million produced? What was needed was a WPA and a CCC but what we get is some sort of trickle down bullshit. As per LBJ, the point is that he is escalating a war in the face of the opposition of the majority of the American people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoseGaspar Donating Member (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. You have now posted 8 times on this thread
without saying a single thing of substance. Other than rudely enforcing some lame agenda of your own, what have you got to say?

Explain how Obama is much more like FDR than he is like Hoover. Explain how he has focused on job programs rather than budget balancing (he hasn't). Explain something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. You're saying he's been more concerned with balancing the budget
than focusing on job creation?

Tell you what: Google "Obama stimulus deficit" and then we'll talk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoseGaspar Donating Member (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. No we won't.
You don't talk. You posture.

The subject is Obama's anti-recessionary policy in comparison to Hoover's and FDR's. It is your podium. Go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. You're claiming that Obama is more concerned with
reducing deficits and 'fiscal discipline' than in job creation and preventing recession.

That is a bald-faced lie.

He supported government intervention to prevent the finance system from collapsing last year. He also pushed through a $787 Billion dollar stimulus-- that was less than he asked for--which was strictly deficit spending.

So, to sit there and say he's being like Herbert Hoover-who did NOTHING for two years after the onset of the Great Depresssion--is blatantly false and ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoseGaspar Donating Member (391 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #42
55. That is what I thought.
You have nothing, but feel the need to say it anyway. I expected at least a minor Google-session. Instead, insults and platitudes... and turn it all on the "opponent". It was your turn to say what you thought.

Are you ELIZA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Geek Tragedy
makes a habit of posting on these threads defending every decision or non decision the Obama administration makes. There was another thread the other day where he posted 22 times, saying nothing but defending and launching ad hominem attacks. Expect to see more I am sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. Wow, someone counts my posts? Sounds like I have my own
Stalkerazzi here. And it is hilarious that someone who smears all people who disagree with him/her as 'cheerleaders' complains as much as you do about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##



This week is our fourth quarter 2009 fund drive. Democratic Underground is
a completely independent website. We depend on donations from our members
to cover our costs. Please take a moment to donate! Thank you!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
48. Here's a novel idea...
Barack Obama is not Herbert Hoover and he's not Franklin Roosevelt. He's Barack Obama.

:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. Yep, and I like Barack Obama when he's Barack Obama
All this bullshit of trying to label Obama as somebody he is not gets on my nerves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #50
54. I liked him when he was a candidate
A lot less as a President. Doesn't seem to have the strategy and boldness thing as locked down as he did when he was running for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Novel idea indeed........problem with most is they lack reasoning powers....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
52. Not a bad comparison
Look up Herbert Hoover's policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
53. "Morons at FDL"???

FDL is a progressive site, FYI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
57. Obama's financial flunkies are the same people who got us into this mess. Now we trust them to get
us out of it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC