Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Could we consider ditching the deal White House and Baucus cut with Big Pharma?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:54 AM
Original message
Could we consider ditching the deal White House and Baucus cut with Big Pharma?
Even as drug makers promise to support Washington’s health care overhaul by shaving $8 billion a year off the nation’s drug costs after the legislation takes effect, the industry has been raising its prices at the fastest rate in years.

Enlarge This Image

Allen Brisson-Smith for The New York Times
Stephen W. Schondelmeyer, a pharmaceutical economics professor at the University of Minnesota, said, “When we have major legislation anticipated, we see a run-up in price increases.”
HEALTH CARE CONVERSATIONS
What do you think of drug companies raising prices in the run-up to health care legislation?
Join this Discussion
Share your thoughts about the health care debate

A blog from The New York Times that tracks the health care debate as it unfolds.
More Health Care Overhaul News
Multimedia

Graphic
Charging More for Prescription Drugs
Add to Portfolio
Merck & Company Inc
Go to your Portfolio »
In the last year, the industry has raised the wholesale prices of brand-name prescription drugs by about 9 percent, according to industry analysts. That will add more than $10 billion to the nation’s drug bill, which is on track to exceed $300 billion this year. By at least one analysis, it is the highest annual rate of inflation for drug prices since 1992.

The drug trend is distinctly at odds with the direction of the Consumer Price Index, which has fallen by 1.3 percent in the last year.


http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/16/business/16drugprices.html?hp

Is there anyone who couldn't have seen this coming? Raising their prices 10% to offset the 8% they have promised to put back on the table for Medicare part D?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valleywine Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
1. We the people did not have a say in its construction and we the
people will not have a say now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. But the teabaggers sure as hell did...
Big Pharma and Big Insurance employed them to muscle the townhalls in August, remember?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valleywine Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. This deal was made much earlier. No teabaggers invited to the table
that I know of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's not a legally binding deal anyway
It can be broken at any time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Now would be a good time to break it
I know the House bill does not honor it. I hope it doesn't survive conference but I do fear the more conservative Senate will push to keep it in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes we should. Who can afford having their premiums increase 33%?

Who can afford the increases in drug prices? This bill is a nightmare.

Thousands cannot afford health insurance, so the answer is to tell them to either buy it or be fined $250,000 AND sent to prison? That's insane.

Also, everybody is talking about it not covering abortions but it supposedly does not cover ANY gynecological care. No mammograms, pelvic exams, Pap smears, etc. It won't pay for oral contraceptives, either. I don't mind men getting Viagra but women should be able to get the pill, and if men can get prostate exams and PSA tests, women should get GYN care.

NO "REFORM" AT ALL IS BETTER THAN LOUSY "REFORM." KILL THIS BILL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC