Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Military Testing 'Ink Spot' Strategy in Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:34 AM
Original message
Military Testing 'Ink Spot' Strategy in Afghanistan
... for anyone who imagined they're ready to let go of their Afghan misadventure.


from NYT: http://schott.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/11/16/ink-spot-strategy/

November 16, 2009 - A military maneuver whereby counter-insurgency and reconstruction efforts spread outwards from secured key areas – as an ink spot expands on paper.

Reporting from Afghanistan for The Washington Times, David Axe revealed: (http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/12/us-tests-ink-spot-strategy-in-afghanistan/)

U.S. forces are testing a modified strategy dubbed “ink spots” in which coalition forces pick certain districts to flood with reconstruction projects and permanently defend from Taliban insurgents.

In Logar province, 50 miles south of Kabul, a newly arrived contingent of U.S. and Czech troops is putting the ink-spot idea into practice. …


Gen. Stanley A. McChrystal ordered U.S. commanders to withdraw their troops from remote areas of Afghanistan in September. Rather than attempting to control the whole country, troops will instead concentrate counter-insurgency efforts on key population centers, expanding slowly from these secured areas.

According to Axe:

In a recent article in Small Wars Journal, Maj. Mehar Omar Khan, a Pakistani officer attending the U.S. Army’s staff college, advocated “creating and building examples” in a handful of Afghan districts. Above all, “don’t try to arrest the sea,” Maj. Khan advised. Instead, “create islands.”

This has worked before. The U.S. Marine Corps embraced the ink-spot strategy in western Iraq in the middle years of the Iraq war. Gradually improving security resulting from that approach provided the basis for Gen. David H. Petraeus’ later population-centric “surge” strategy.

Afghanistan, however, presents a different challenge. Unlike Iraq, its population is mostly rural and dispersed among small villages. Also, Afghanistan is more populous, and there are far fewer coalition and native troops in Afghanistan than in Iraq.



(Also known as an oil spot or ink blot strategy, this approach was explored by the British in Malaya in the 1950s. For further discussion, see this entry on the Double-Tongued Dictionary (good read): http://www.doubletongued.org/index.php/dictionary/oil_spot_strategy/)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. They called that strategy "Fortified Villages" in Vietnam. Didn't work there either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. the word "pacification" also comes to mind.
or am I getting that confused with some other imperial war?
Definitely a modern day "fort building" exercise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. With one major difference:
In Vietnam, creation of the strategic hamlets involved forced relocation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting. Still, our soldiers are dying for a corrupt regime and that is wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
3. How many ways can we continue a lost war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. NGO's need to be doing the reconstruction projects
Afghans are not stupid people. They see the inevitable waste and corruption on these military projects. It makes them as sick as us to see it.

Then when they realize most of the money is wasted paying mercenaries to terrorize them into capitulating it really pisses them off.

It wouldn't make us none too happy if someone was doing it to us either.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. After eight years, we really should be past the strategy "testing" phase
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Déjà vu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. That's some expensive ink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. red ink
methinks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I was just thinking that
was gonna edit my post but you summed it up perfectly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
optimator Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. waste of time
waste of money.
waste of lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC