Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New climate change study is controversial

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:50 AM
Original message
New climate change study is controversial
New climate change study is controversial

BRISTOL, England, Nov. 16 (UPI) -- A British study suggests Earth's ecosystems and oceans have a much greater capacity to absorb carbon dioxide than has been previously estimated.

The study, led by researcher Wolfgang Knorr at the University of Bristol, found the balance between the airborne and the absorbed fraction of carbon dioxide has stayed approximately constant since 1850, despite emissions of carbon dioxide having risen from about 2 billion tons a year in 1850 to the current 35 billion tons a year.

Knorr said his results run contrary to a significant body of recent research that suggests the capacity of terrestrial ecosystems and the oceans to absorb CO2 should start to diminish as CO2 emissions increase, allowing greenhouse gas levels to skyrocket.

He said the strength of his research is that it rests solely on measurements and statistical data, and does not rely on computations with complex climate models.

http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2009/11/16/New-climate-change-study-is-controversial/UPI-11111258382741/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hey golly gee if we just don't look at the effects on our climate
things look pretty good.

2 billion tons were absorbed and airborne at the same rate as our current 35 billion tons, so hey, things aren't so bad. Ignore those melting icecaps and all that warming, and you know, things haven't changed much.

When will Knorr be appointed as Fox's new climate change specialist?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. United Press International? I'd give it more credit if if came from WorldNetDaily!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is the airborne fraction of anthropogenic CO2 emissions increasing?
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2009/2009GL040613.shtml

Is the airborne fraction of anthropogenic CO2 emissions increasing?
Wolfgang Knorr

Department of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Several recent studies have highlighted the possibility that the oceans and terrestrial ecosystems have started loosing part of their ability to sequester a large proportion of the anthropogenic CO2 emissions. This is an important claim, because so far only about 40% of those emissions have stayed in the atmosphere, which has prevented additional climate change. This study re-examines the available atmospheric CO2 and emissions data including their uncertainties. It is shown that with those uncertainties, the trend in the airborne fraction since 1850 has been 0.7 ± 1.4% per decade, i.e. close to and not significantly different from zero. The analysis further shows that the statistical model of a constant airborne fraction agrees best with the available data if emissions from land use change are scaled down to 82% or less of their original estimates. Despite the predictions of coupled climate-carbon cycle models, no trend in the airborne fraction can be found.



This seems like a useful result. It basically says that in the past 40% of CO2 emissions have stayed in the atmosphere, while the other 60% have been absorbed in the oceans and terrestrial systems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Thank goodness the report came out before the melting of the permafrost.
And while we still have some rainforest left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC