Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LA Times: Schwarzenegger quietly quashed effort to improve commuter rails

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 09:54 AM
Original message
LA Times: Schwarzenegger quietly quashed effort to improve commuter rails
Schwarzenegger quietly quashed effort to improve commuter rails
The governor ordered officials to seek federal money only for the proposed bullet train between San Francisco and San Diego. Rail advocates say the commuter line upgrades should take priority.

By Dan Weikel and Eric Bailey

November 13, 2009


Reporting from Sacramento and Los Angeles - Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger quietly spiked an effort last month to win $1.1 billion in federal high-speed rail stimulus funds for 29 projects to improve the safety, speed and capacity of heavily traveled commuter corridors through Southern California.

Instead, he ordered state officials to seek money for only one project -- the proposed bullet train between San Francisco and San Diego.

The governor's decision was intended to increase the state's chances of receiving high-speed rail money, officials said. California is competing with more than 40 applicants from 23 other states.

But the action has sparked debate among rail advocates about whether too high a priority is being placed on the high-speed train project at the expense of the second-busiest rail corridor in the nation, where budget-strapped commuter services have been trying to improve safety, add track and cut travel times from San Diego to Santa Barbara.

Eliminated from the state application for federal funds was almost $170 million for positive train control -- computer-guided braking systems designed to prevent collisions and allow conventional trains to safely travel at 110 mph. Such automated systems, which the federal government wants installed by 2015, would have prevented the Metrolink crash in Chatsworth last year that killed 25 people in the worst rail accident in modern California history. .........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-rail13-2009nov13,0,6550006.story




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. He gets attacked either way.
every rail line in the US could use more money for upgrades and improvements. At the same time, every major cluster of cities (NY Boston DC Phili) (Detroit Chicago St. Louis) (San Diego LA San Fran Seattle) would benefit greatly from high speed rail connections.

In a perfect world, we could do it all. Unfortunately, we have our massive hangover from 8 yrs of Bush and are wasting a trillion a year in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You hit on something I think about often:
The waste of money to those stupid wars.

Can you imagine all that we could have done to actually benefit ourselves?

Wow...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't get why we on the left are so quiet about it.
Every time some right winger yells about health care costs, we should put these wars of choice in their face and force them to defend it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Too few uncorrupted elected officials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Too true. I regret that should it continue in this way, our
country will be torn apart by special interests, and unable to ever stand up on its own again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. This BETTER be the one that goes down
Edited on Mon Nov-16-09 10:38 AM by Le Taz Hot
the woefully under-represented population located in the California interior and not another fucking "coastal route." I'm serious! Southern California and the Bay Area get a disproportionate amount of state and federal funding while the Central Valley continues to pay for it. If this is the one that covers the Central Valley I say, "Good!"

Edited for gooder English.

Re-edited for the grammatically anal. Happy now, Sport?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. betterer english, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I think the "leading" proposal is Sylmar - Palmdale - Bkrsfld - Fresno - Sac,
with a spur, Gilroy-San Jose-SF.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Now THAT would make me happy.
I don't know if anyone is aware of this but if you want to ride the train from, say, Fresno to Los Angeles, you can't do it without having to transfer to a bus in B'Field and riding that the rest of the way. The thing is, it's the same throughout all of inland California. Those of us in the Central Valley have virtually NO options for getting N/S or E/W without having to use fossil fuel. This SHOULD be a concern for the whole state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC