Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boxer: Senate Has Votes To Block Stupak Amendment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 05:55 PM
Original message
Boxer: Senate Has Votes To Block Stupak Amendment
Source: Huffington Post

With Reporting By Ryan Grim

One of Congress's foremost champions of abortion rights said on Monday that the Senate did not have the votes to add a more restrictive anti-abortion amendment to health care reform legislation.

Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) said that 60 votes would be needed to strip the current health care bill of its abortion-related language and replace it with a version resembling that passed by the House of Representatives on Saturday. And, in an interview with the Huffington Post, the California Democrat predicted that pro-choice forces in the Senate would keep that from happening.

"If someone wants to offer this very radical amendment, which would really tear apart compromise, then I think at that point they would need to have 60 votes to do it," Boxer said. "And I believe in our Senate we can hold it."

"It is a much more pro-choice Senate than it has been in a long time," she added. "And it is much more pro-choice than the House."

Read more:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/10/boxer-senate-has-votes-to_n_352064.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. They don't have the votes for a strong Public Option
aka Rockefeller, but they have the votes for this. Never ceases to surprise me what they will and will not support over there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musette_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Looks like I wasn't the only irate constituent
who fired off email to Sen Boxer last Sunday. I would have terminated my monthly Be A Boxer donations, had she not stood up against this attempt at even more Christo-fascist oppression of and discrimination against US Citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good news. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R! n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
euphoria12leo Donating Member (511 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
7. K & R
I guess Claire Mccaskill heard from her angry constituents who know the Stupak amendment is stupid and wondered what the heck was she thinking
when jumped out there defending the amendment.


:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. GOOD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. k i c k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC