Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is President Obama Getting Enough Pressure From the Left to Get Out of Afghanistan?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 12:16 PM
Original message
Poll question: Is President Obama Getting Enough Pressure From the Left to Get Out of Afghanistan?
This poll is directed to those of us on the Left who are opposed to continuing the U.S. military action and presence in Afghanistan.

Are we doing enough?

Are we being vocal enough?

I don't see much visible opposition to this senseless and impossible military action.

If I'm not seeing or hearing much opposition, then President Obama isn't either.

Are we sidetracked in a health-care debate while he wrestles with what to do in Afghanistan?

Should we be doing more to stop this insanity?

What should we be doing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. You aren't doing as much as you would to Bush
I think Obama knows how you feel about it though, if that's your concern. The real issue I think you need to consider is, basically, truth. You should really be scowering what the generals, the ambassador, local Afghan opposition who are more than happy to talk, Afghani women, etc.; have to say. Focus on things like Karzai's brother, warlords, corrupt officials, who McChrystal really is, true issues. That's why I keep saying I wish the left would organize a strong party and become the second party and push the Republicans off the cliff with the teabaggers. I'd much rather argue policy with you guys than with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. That's exactly what I see happening, sandnsea.
We would be giving George W. Bush hell right now over this shit. But we are not.

That's why I asked the question here at what is supposed to be a liberal blog, but where it seems a great many of us collectively are soft on this because it's Obama now, not Bush.

Where are our marches against this madness as Obama makes his decision? Why is this getting a pass?

Your point goes to the heart of my question: we aren't doing as much as we would to Bush. Well stated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissDeeds Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I agree completely
I firmly believe this cannot be 'won' - whatever that means - militarily. And your question, "Where are our marches against this madness..." is important and worth considering. If the war was wrong under Bush, is it any less wrong under Obama?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. How to be effective advocates
when you're advocating to your friends. I think you choose battles your friends are concerned about too. You don't try to pretend Obama = Bush just because Obama doesn't equal Kucinich. Help focus the debate, don't force people to choose between the left and the Democratic President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting that you assume that the left only has one position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Uh...that would be the Left, yes not DLC Democrats.
I think it's safe to say that the Left, from MoveOn.Org to The Nation is squarely against our continued military involvement there.

It's a very safe assumption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes, I'm sure 21 cruise-missile humanitarian "intellectuals" on "the left" disagree.
Edited on Fri Nov-13-09 02:47 PM by JackRiddler
They're almost as numerous as the neocons, and unfortunately almost as influential.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
6. No.
It should shame all of us media-savvy, well-informed antiwar people that the biggest demonstration in DC this year, though only moderately impressive, consisted of pre-modern fantasists protesting a collection of mostly non-existent things that scare them. And most of them probably still only have AOL accounts, if that. And all we do is log on to tell each other (understandably) how ridiculous they are. Has the Internet captured the left?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. You are so right.
If a fraction of the ranting on the internet transferred to the streets we could change the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. MSM spins it and people eat it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. US pres admins don't give a fuck about what you or I want, period
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Let the President do his job.
He said he will end this war, so let him do what we put him in office to do. War is peace. And who do you want protecting you? Is Pepsi going to protect you? Good luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. No because when the Iraq surge was going on, Afghanistan wasn't even talked
about. And then this meme about Afghanistan being the "right war" began to circulate so people just kept quiet about it because the main topic was Iraq. Now that the Iraq war is coming to a close, people realize we should have been protesting both wars all along, not just Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC