Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rupert Murdoch: The Internet Does Not Exist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 12:46 AM
Original message
Rupert Murdoch: The Internet Does Not Exist
Nov 10, 09
Rupert Murdoch: The Internet Does Not Exist
by Michael Wolff

Rupert continues his war with the Internet. Over the weekend, he told an interviewer (the interviewer, on Sky News Australia, works for him) that as part of his campaign to charge users for reading his content, what he plans to do is to block Google from indexing his newspapers. As of a year ago, Murdoch had never used Google — never once, by himself, run an Internet search — and so it might be reasonable to assume he doesn’t know what’s involved here.

It is quite possible he doesn’t realize — and can’t fathom — that removing News Corp.’s newspapers from Google means that, in the largest part of the information market, they would cease to count, cease to be a factor, that their absence would not register as a hole. Nor, it is possible, does he realize that as much as 90% of his traffic comes from Google and other search engines, that even if his goal is to sell content, there is really no other way to direct people to it than through search engines. So his idea is something like wanting to sell newspapers but not wanting to let people see them on the newsstand where they might read the headlines for free.

As it happens, Murdoch’s campaign to put content back in the tube and to have consumers pay to get it out is proving, in one sense, curiously successful. He has publishers all over Britain and America who say they are ready to back him in his plan. Of course, they all have nothing to lose by encouraging Rupert to lead this charge and have his papers disappear while their papers remain free a while longer and scoop up his online readers.

Rupert, in other words, doesn’t have the most rudimentary know-how about cause and effect when it comes to building an online news business, paid or otherwise. He is not, in this regard, quite compos mentis. He gets to sound off this way, to embarrass himself and confound everyone else, because of the rare nature of his company—he can’t be fired or even corrected (he doesn’t really listen). And he is not ridiculed by his fellow publishers because many of them too are vague on the business basics.

(snip)

http://www.newser.com/off-the-grid/post/329/rupert-murdoch-the-internet-does-not-exist.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Does he not realize that he is just doing us all a big favor?!
he is such a piece of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. The sooner the better.
The internet doesn't like you Rupert. We think too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. Well boycotting Google is stupid
Especially when you're in the real news as a matter of routine.

But it's not true that there is no other way to direct people to sites. If you rely only on search engines, you're not going to do very well online. Most traffic comes from links from quality sites, not search engines.

Somebody in the Murdoch empire knows where their traffic comes from, and it's probably 10% from Google.

Still, 10% of your traffic is entirely too much to toss out the window.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Those damn tubes!
My prediction in ten years murdoch is either dead or broke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think we should prove him wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Already have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. What a dumb ass. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. Most critters don't become fossils 'til after they're dead.
Rupert Murdoch is ahead of his time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. Well stated.
An alien fossil, at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. I guess someone over at NewsCorp will have to bite the bullet & tell him
Personally, I'd love him to charge for his content. Who'd buy it? Tea-baggers?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downtown Hound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
10. Come on don't tell him!
Let him do it and fall on his ass. I would love nothing better than for Mr. Goebbels, I mean, Murdoch's stories to disappear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
11. "he is not ridiculed by his fellow publishers because ..."
they don't mind watching him hang himself ? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. Oooh, we should be scared! The Financial Times in Britain has done the same thing
Excuse my unusual profanity, but seriously. So. Fucking. What?

MSNBC & Al Jazeera (just 2 examples) will still have their news (video & written) free to view online, as will Reuters and AP/AFP no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
13. Go for it Rupert
cut that nose off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
14. He must despise the Internets.
He's spent years investing a fortune in a propaganda empire that relies on one-way communication. I'll bet he thought he'd rule the world! Billions of little Rupert clones!

Then along came the Internets and ample opportunities for people to turn elsewhere for their "news" and entertainment and...discussion of his propaganda empire.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. One has to question his business... shall I say savvy?
How can anyone goes through his business not realizing the power of the Internet? And especially when that business is media?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tabasco_Dave Donating Member (744 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
15. In my home Fox News doesn't exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 04:57 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. My home too...
I have FOX on ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Me too!
And if I stumble into it, I puke a little and move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
santamargarita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 05:07 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. No Fox anything on my Telescreen either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
19. He could start his own search engine
"False Propaganda Search"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
20. Works for me!
The sooner the better. I find it hilarious that the Freeper idiots will have to pay to read his crap. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
21. The world would be better for it.
Go Rupert, go!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
22. blathering old fool
hahahahaha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
24. Bravo! brilliant idea there Rupert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
25. Truthfully
who would really miss online newspapers if you had to pay. There is so much news in other context that you can search and read. Rupert is only hurting himself. The people who pay for internet content are those who are interested in that particular subject. And people who read and watch Fox sure aren't going to pay to watch and read. He screwed himself. He thinks Fox is so good, and truthfully I think the numbers are inflated, so let him charge and then see how fast it goes down. Some greedy idiot is feeding him wrong info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
27. Jesus, what an idiot
I work in publishing. Every meeting is about how to maximize our web presence by building the brand and making it as valuable as the print version.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC