Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DemocracyNow: New Report Reveals U.S. Indirectly Funding the Taliban

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:50 AM
Original message
DemocracyNow: New Report Reveals U.S. Indirectly Funding the Taliban
So, why are we in Afghanistan again?

As U.S. Ambassador Casts Doubt on Troop Increase in Afghanistan, New Report Reveals U.S. Indirectly Funding the Taliban

In a last-minute dissent ahead of a critical war cabinet meeting on escalating the Afghan war, U.S. Ambassador Karl Eikenberry has cast doubt on a troop escalation until the Afghan government can address corruption and other internal problems. Meanwhile, a report reveals how the US government is financing the very same insurgent forces in Afghanistan that American and NATO soldiers are fighting. Investigative journalist Aram Roston traces how the Pentagon’s civilian contractors in Afghanistan end up paying insurgent groups to protect American supply routes from attack.

The U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan is warning against sending more troops to fight in the Afghan war. In a last-minute dissent, Ambassador Karl Eikenberry sent two cables this week casting doubt on a troop escalation until the Afghan government can address corruption and other internal problems.

Well today we turn to a new report that reveals how the US government is financing the very same insurgent forces in Afghanistan that American and NATO soldiers are fighting.
“How the US Funds the Taliban” is the cover story of the latest issue of the Nation magazine.

Investigative journalist Aram Roston traces how the Pentagon’s civilian contractors in Afghanistan end up paying insurgent groups to protect American supply routes from attack. The practice of buying the Taliban’s protection is not a secret. US military officials in Kabul told Roston that a minimum of 10 percent of the Pentagon"s logistics contracts consists of payments to the Taliban.

That translates into millions of dollars being funneled to the Taliban. This summer, anticipating a surge of US troops, the military expanded its trucking contracts in Afghanistan by 600 percent to a total of over two billion dollars.

Well, Aram Roston joins us now here in the firehouse studio. He"s the author of the book “The man who pushed America to War: The Life, Adventures, and Obsessions of Ahmad Chalabi.” His latest piece “How the US Funds the Taliban” was supported by the investigative fund at the Nation institute.

...

http://www.democracynow.org/2009/11/12/taliban

Related Links

"How the US Funds the Taliban"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. so typical
we have no moral business being in any wars, especially when our policies are always duplicitous and dishonest.
<<<<War is a racket
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Gotta fund your pretext....
Otherwise they dry up and go away and THEN what excuse do you use to justify your military bases?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Insane, isn't it?
Money for the Taliban and the Contractor Middle Man. None for universal health care.

How much do those Blackwater (Xe) fekkers and their owners make a day, again?

War is a racket indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. doesn't that just figure?! US hasn't quite figured out that imperialism doesn't work.
Maybe Obama will get it and do the right thing and get out.

So, we get this instead of real health CARE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think the "dithering" is about putting pressure on Karzai
probably to get some concession wanted by one or more NATO allies. The Ambassador's story is a strong hint of the audience for whom this little drama of suspense is intended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. OK, so it's not Carrie Prejean, but it's still kinda important...
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC