Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What really happened at Fort Hood

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 09:16 AM
Original message
What really happened at Fort Hood
Edited on Thu Nov-12-09 09:17 AM by malaise
Will we ever hear the truth?
---------------------------------
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/12/us/12hood.html?_r=2&hp=&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1258034527-qxax+xfBqwW6rkPlKMePmw
<snip>
KILLEEN, Tex. — Sgt. Kimberly D. Munley has been applauded as a hero across the nation for shooting down Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan during the bloody rampage at Fort Hood last week. The account of heroism, given by the authorities, attracted the attention of newspapers, the networks and television talk shows.

But the story of how the petite police officer and the accused gunman went down in an exchange of gunfire does not agree with the account of an eyewitness who had gone to the base’s processing center, where the shooting occurred, to conduct business before being deployed.

The witness, who asked not to be identified, said Major Hasan wheeled on Sergeant Munley as she rounded the corner of a building and shot her, putting her on the ground. Then Major Hasan turned his back on her and started putting another magazine into his semiautomatic pistol.

How the authorities came to issue the original version of the story, which made Sergeant Munley a national hero for several days and obscured Sergeant Todd’s role, remains unclear. (Military officials also said for several hours after the shooting that Major Hasan had been killed, although he had survived.)

spacing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. Fascinating.
That is all I can manage to say right now.

While they are both deserving of praise for going into the line of fire, I am not surprised after Jessica Lynch that someone would try to put a different spin on things. Just who that someone is might be very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. the friendly fire speculation has been quieted, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Maybe because it was speculation - presumably those armed were outside the building
except for the gunman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. I wondered about that when I read this CNN story on a DU thread.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=103x494313

I was rather amazed that almost no one else noticed the enormous difference in the two stories. It smelled very strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, it will likely be another Army fabrication ala Jessica Lynch.
Edited on Thu Nov-12-09 09:37 AM by TexasObserver
The Army's original Jessica Lynch story:

Surrounded and wounded, she killed several Iraqi soldiers, was captured, and while being held a prisoner at a hospital, was repeatedly raped, until the daring Army mission saved her.

Reality:

She drove down the wrong street, got hit, and was badly injured, never having fired a weapon. She was taken to the hospital and under good care. Word was sent to the Army that she was there. Instead of just getting her, they staged a bogus raid to create the "movie" they wanted to use for propaganda.

That's the Army. They make up heroic tales to take the eye off the disaster they allowed to happen.

The female police officer did her job and bravely so. That is a hero, if one is needed. She did that job and did run to the gunfire. The story doesn't need to make up something that didn't happen. If someone else shot the doctor, that should be told. For once, it would be nice if the Army just gave us the facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. I believe that Jessica Lynch verified that she was injured in the vehicle accident--not by
enemy fire. But who are we to quibble with details when the Army is trying to create another Sergeant York?

I long for the day when we can get a FACTUAL account from our military, rather than some jazzed up version of what is already a heroic act.

Not trying to take anything away from Officer Munley here. She's a hero in my book. A very brave woman.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
5. Will we ever hear the truth?
What an astoundingly bullshit answer! Time for Mueller to go.

The FBI said it turned over the information to the Army, but Defense Department officials today denied that.

Cheney’s special ops, just to whip up the fear factor a little more?

A former counterterrorism official said the information about Hasan's communications with the imam should have been shared with the military unless the FBI specifically forbade it.

President Obama needs a new FBI director.

At some point, President Obama has to lose confidence in this man. He is a proven liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. 100% correct
Who sent him from Walter Reed to Fort Hood and why? The plot thickens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #5
19. ALL FBI Directors are proven liars. That's their job. Or, at least, a big part of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
6. People were murdered by a gunman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. So what's your point? She's "less" of a hero because she got shot first but shot him while he was
reloading?

:crazy:

I'm sorry but this picking nits.

:crazy:

If this were the Orlando shooter and she were a civillian cop, she'd be totally justified in blowing his brains out before he killed her or another civillian. We're supposed to have some kind of different standard here because he was a Muslim and this shooting MIGHT have some connection to his religious/political views? I'm sorry but that (adopting a different standard of police conduct) is just as bigotted as Wolf Blitzer questioning Nadal's right to counsel.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. I think they're trying to imply a cowardly act
She shot him in the back while reloading while on the ground, not while charging bravely through gun fire. So you can see how such a story wouldn't play as well as the first story released to the press. Conflicting eye witnesses reports is nothing new in a criminal case. Given the number of witnesses there's never going to be a single coherent final version that doesn't conflict with some eye witnesses. I personally don't care, but there's a lot of DUers paranoid of or flat out hate the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. You know when some psycho is shooting innocent bystanders I'm not real picky about which side the
cops shoot him/her on. The back works just as well for me.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Back, front, side, groin, ear. You're right, ddeclue. Kill the motherfucker. However you can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. No, she's not less of a hero.
The point of the op, imo, is that the official Army story doesn't jive with eye witness accounts of what actually happened. It's disturbing, because, if true, it points to an official policy of disinformation, Jessica Lynch, Pat Tillman, etc.

Speaking of bigotry (and racism),I find it interesting that they've hyped her role in this, while almost totally ignoring Sgt Todd. What is he? Chopped liver?

As for the Major, I think it way too early to jump to any conclusions about motive. This could be nothing more than someone going "postal" in the workplace or it could be a lone wolf religious extremest, or it could be a terrorist attack, aided and abetted by other actors as yet unnamed.

My take on all of this is that I think there were a lot of hero's that day, some of whom will never get any publicity at all, but I think it behooves the Army to get the story straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. "OFFICIAL Army story? There is no "official" Army story yet. That some DU'ers are implying there is
shows how much their own preconceived notions condition responses.

From the article:

Six days after the deadly shooting rampage at a center where soldiers were preparing for deployment, the military has yet to put out a full account of what happened.

At a news conference outside the post on Wednesday, Lt. Col. John Rossi refused to take questions about who shot Major Hasan or why the initial reports said it had been Sergeant Munley rather than Sergeant Todd.

“These questions are specific to the investigation and I am not going to address that,” Colonel Rossi said.

Public affairs officials also declined to make Chuck Medley, the director of emergency services at the post, available for questions. It was Mr. Medley, who oversees the post’s civilian police and fire departments, who gave the first account of how Sergeant Munley stopped the gunman.

On Tuesday night, Lt. Col. Lee Packnett, of the Army’s Office of the Chief of Public Affairs at the Pentagon, declined to say whether it was Sergeant Todd who had shot Major Hasan. “It could have been, but the final outcome will be determined by the results of the ballistics tests.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
10. Get this
"I think the closest thing that indicates that there's a court-martial in the works is last night about 8 I did receive an e-mail from the prosecutor at Fort Hood indicating to me that the pass privileges and leave privileges of Maj. Hasan had been revoked," Galligan said. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
11. I generally don't trust any article that refers to a woman as being 'petite'. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
12. None of the details are clear. We'll just have to wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
13. Where I have heard this before? Oh yeah, Lynch.
I never take US authorities' words anymore at face value. That shipped sailed a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
14. And the timing of the shooting.
Convenient, since the are debating troop surge in Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
21. The key excerpts, telling who "Sergeant TODD" is
But not everything is a plot. There really is a "fog of war" when things are happening fast and all at once and not everything can be known immediately.

**********QUOTE********

.... It was at that moment that Senior Sgt. Mark Todd, a veteran police officer, rounded another corner of the building, found Major Hasan fumbling with his weapon and shot him. ....

Sergeant Todd acknowledged that he had played a major role in bringing the violence to an end. He said that he had fired at the suspect, kicked his weapon away and placed him in handcuffs. It was the first time in his 25 years in law enforcement and the military, Sergeant Todd said, that he had used his weapon. ....

********UNQUOTE********
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
23. Hasan had a security clearance at the "secret" level....
This smells, this really smells like a Sy-Op to me.

....
And, as of now at least, there's no surveillance camera footage? the lack of video from the scene which was almost certainly filmed by security cameras.

....
"We must compile every piece of information that was known about the gunman, and we must learn what was done with that information. Once we have those facts, we must act upon them."

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iwYEFasV3WqznkJoN2-BwTxAN4fgD9BV8RHG1

....
President Barack Obama said on Saturday he would hold to account those who missed warning signs that could have prevented a shooting rampage on a Texas army base.

The officials said U.S. intelligence agencies learned of the communications late last year and passed this knowledge to federal authorities, who judged they were largely consistent with his academic work and did not warrant an investigation.

The information was shared with a joint terrorism task force led by the FBI, but the Pentagon said it had not been informed of the contacts until after the shooting spree.

....
On the Thursday evening that this tragedy took place, I met in the Oval Office with Secretary of Defense Gates, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mullen, and FBI Director Mueller

http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN13478696

Review Of Ft. Hood Shootings Needed
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2BgWKlPAuQ



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recovered Repug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. A "secret" security clearance means nothing.
All officers hold a secret clearance, or higher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. “Your intention is the main issue,”
But a counterterrorism analyst who examined the messages shortly after they were sent decided that they were consistent with AUTHORIZED research Major Hasan was conducting and did not alert his military superiors.

....
In the Web posting investigators BEliEvE was his, Major Hasan suggested that a suicide bomber might have just as noble a purpose as a soldier who throws himself on a grenade to protect his comrades.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/15/us/15hasan.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
24. The Army loves to exaggerate the deeds of women who come under fire
Remember the Panama invasion--you know, the thing back in 1983 when we had to expend American soldiers' lives to correct a Bush Family mistake. The Army needed to take the Panamanian Defense Force's working dog facility. They sent an MP company that had a female company commander to do the mission, the facility's security team decided to shoot at the MPs, and next thing you know the company commander was the next Audie Murphy.

Who actually dropped Major Hasan doesn't change the fact that two very brave MPs--SGTs Munley and Todd--went into a building where some maniac was walking around with a gun shooting people, and they're both heroes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
26. k i c k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
28. The news media got it all wrong the first time around
Color me shocked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-14-09 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
30. they also promoted the story of what he yelled before he began firing...has this been verified?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sattahipdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-16-09 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
31.  Major Hasan Sought War Crimes Prosecution of U.S. Soldiers
Major Nidal Hasan's military superiors repeatedly ignored or
rebuffed his efforts to open criminal prosecutions of soldiers he
claimed had confessed to "war crimes" during psychiatric
counseling, according to investigative reports circulated among
federal law enforcement officials.

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/officials-major-hasan-sought-war-crimes-prosecution-us/story?id=9019904

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=4148620&mesg_id=4148620
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC