Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are abortions covered in the health care insurance Congress has?????

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:21 PM
Original message
Are abortions covered in the health care insurance Congress has?????
Inquiring minds want to know so that they can blast out enough messages to cripple the Interwebs about it if they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, only in cases of incest or rape or endangerment of mothers life
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 04:27 PM by wishlist
I just read the Blue Cross Federal plans booklet to verify that abortions are covered but only in cases of rape, incest or endangerment of mother's life if pregnancy were to go to term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLyellowdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I am sick to death of this abortion crap!
It's an abortion REGARDLESS OF THE REASON FOR HAVING ONE!!!! If people are against abortion because it "kills/murders a baby/fetus" then it is no less killing or murdering even in the case of rape, incest, or to save the mother. It's still an abortion.

At this stage of the discussion, one is either for abortion or not. Yes or no. The reason for having an abortion doesn't make any difference. The difficulty comes ONLY if one is FOR abortion and then one has to decide at which point during gestation is it too late (too wrong) to have the abortion.

I am for a woman's right to choose...abortion is a medical and a personal issue, but what the Republicans and Blue Dogs and Pro-life people seem to want to do is have it both ways. An abortion by any other name (or reason) is still an abortion. If one approves of abortion in cases of rape, incest, or to save the mother, then those same people are not Pro-Lifers. They favor abortion. They just don't want to admit that it has to be under "their" set of rules. IT'S STILL ABORTION!!!!

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMarple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. God aborts babies every day. Well, not babies, actually.
It is fairly common up until about three months, and still happens after. Should I ask my congress critter to have God locked up or ask him instead to stop practicing medicine with out a license? Such a dilemma. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLyellowdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yes.
What's fair for the goose is fair for the god...or whoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ocracoker16 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for letting me know. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. If a congressperson used their salary to pay for an abortion, does that count as a federally
funded abortion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Probably not.
A salary is payment for services rendered (which leads to another topic entirely, but . . .)

Federal monies 'given' to subsidize insurance premiums are a different kettle of fish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. A restriction imposed by Republicans.
Who, of course, do not include affordable access to abortion in their party platform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oral contraceptives (and BC in general) are covered in the fed's BCBS and Aetna plans...
One supposes they'll be covered in H.R.3962.

I wonder if Catholic Bishops who Pelosi conferred with had anything to say about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC