Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice O'Connor's Husband Dead at 79

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:04 PM
Original message
Justice O'Connor's Husband Dead at 79
John O'Connor III, the husband of retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, died today in Phoenix of complications from Alzheimer's disease, according to an announcement from the Court. He was 79.

O'Connor, an accomplished lawyer in his own right, worked with Miller & Chevalier and Bryan Cave after his wife was appointed to the Supreme Court in 1981. He was a familiar figure at the Court, and once said that his life had become "vastly broadened and vastly enriched by her appointment." Early in her tenure, to his amusement, some who were not accustomed to a woman on the Court addressed John O'Connor as Justice O'Connor.

The justice retired in 2006 in large part because of his illness, but soon thereafter his condition worsened, and he was moved to a Phoenix facility for those with the disease. Justice O'Connor, who has remained very active on issues of public education and judicial independence, has also become an advocate for more research into treatments for the disease.

http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2009/11/justice-oconnors-husband-dead-at-79.html


Please be respectful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a shame.
Her husband had Alzheimers and fell in love with another patient and essentially didn't recognize Justice O'Connor.

I'm really sorry to hear of his death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. That's the wrong response. Americans are too fucked up over a natural
process. Ignoring death does not make it away.

Instead, we should celebrate his life, we should be grateful that his passing, under such pain, mental disorder and discomfort, and under the circumstances has finally come. And we should look to Justice O'Connor as an example of how to deal with horrific diseases and loss of mental faculties in a loved one. We should be glad that SHE no longer has to suffer from such a debilitating condition in a spouse.

Sorry is absolutely the wrong word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I understand what you're saying and agree with it for the
most part. And, yes, I'm sure there is a measure of relief on her part and that of her family. However, I know firsthand that there is also a lot of sorrow as well. Watching a beloved spouse or immediate family member slowly succumb to this is a pain beyond description for those who've never dealt with it. A lot of the sorrow is for what could have been and what the person was reduced to in the end as compared to the way they were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. RIP.
Although I wish Justice O'Connor had stayed on the Supreme Court, I can understand her decision. My MIL died from complications from dementia. It's a tragedy to see someone you love deteriorate, and there's nothing you can do to stop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. Alzheimer's disease is terrible, and I'm sorry for that...
...but Sandra day O'Connor had no respect for the law or the democratic process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. She had considerably more than Justice Alito, imo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Bush v Gore was the most horrendous supreme court decision ever...
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 01:24 PM by joeybee12
...the judicial system is based upon precedent...this totall disregarded that for purely political reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I'm sure that her lack of respect for the law figured prominently in her husband's Alzheimer's.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I said i was sorry for that...
but Bush v gore was a travesty...and she knwe it...hard to feel really sorry for someone who had utter contempt for the constitution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Whatever nt

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. The Iraq War...the Afghanistan war...whatever for those also in your opinion...
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 01:40 PM by joeybee12
tahks to Bush being appointed...all that blood spilled because of the Gang of 5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. No, evidently, the Gang of Five Plus O'Connor's Husband
That BASTARD. How DARE he.

:sarcasm:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Sorry your reading skills are so bad...
...my deepest sympathy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Here's the website of another man named John O'Connor. You should really give him what for.
http://www.johnoconnorphoto.com/

He has nothing at all to do with Sandra Day O'Connor's work as a Supreme Court justice, but then again, HER John O'Connor didn't either, but you're out for his blood.

I can find a few more John O'Connors for you to malign, if you like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. That has nothing to do with anything right now.
Some things transcend politics and this is one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. The Iraq War and the Afghanistan War are still going on...if not for Bush
being appointed, thousands of lives would not have been lost...I can't brush away this travesty like you can apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Maybe O'Connor has some graves of dead pets on her property...you can piss on those, too.


You can probably find some of her relatives in the phone book...might be worth a couple of crank calls? Just be sure to hit *67 first.

Have fun avenging every grievance you've ever had since 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. RIP

And warm thoughts for her straightforward approach to the sad course of their lives in the past few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. It is not necessarily sad, but more often a release in the case of Alzheimer's disease.
My mother has been in a nursing home for 12 years now with Alzheimer's disease. She has not known me for years now. She is in a good home, but for many they live in the big "now" which is collapsing upon itself. Many are "there" in body only. Ironically my mother has not been in a hospital overnight since she had my brother over 50 years ago. She is now 80.

So it is a sad day for Justice O'Connor, but I am sure there is also a sense of release for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm very sorry to see this, for her and
the rest of the family. I know firsthand what she and they dealt with, as my fairly young stepdad has had Lewy Body Dementia (the second most common form of dementia after Alzheimer's-in fact, many LBD cases are initially diagnosed as Alzheimer's) for years and is now institutionalized. Any form of dementia is a particular kind of hell that I wouldn't wish on the worst person and the worst family. It gets to the point where it's much harder on the family than on the person him or herself.

I wish her and her family peace and comfort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
21. RIP, and peace to the family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC