Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My prediction for the final healthcare compromise

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 12:49 PM
Original message
My prediction for the final healthcare compromise
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 12:50 PM by Shagbark Hickory
My prediction for the final healthcare compromise looks like this.

The mandate will have a trigger.

Rather than a public option, there will be the creation of non-profit option or optionS, plural (it will probably be called the non-profit option)

The non-profit option would be a free market bazaar of private companies. This will provide some competition to for-profits. Once there is sufficient non-profit companies, the mandate goes into effect.

There would also be a trigger for a public option, a government-run non-profit if the private "non-profit" option didn't materialize.

There will be subsidies for the ultra poor to buy into the NPO. And by ultra poor, I'm talking "soup kitchen poor", not the middle class. We're on our own.

Anyone despite employment status can join a NPO, except of course in states that opt out.

So, essentially, 2 triggers and an opt out.

Rates would not be negotiated by the government but the private NPOs would negotiate rates in a fashion similar to the private health denials companies currently do.

Obviously not ideal but this is my prediction. You've heard it here first from a certified & licensed psychic.

The strong points here are that even though it's privately run, if anyone could join an NPO, it would be strong competition for the health denial companies. On the other hand, unless rates are aggressively negotiated, costs will still rise. There's a risk that the NPOs could be bought out by for-profits and I doubt there will be much regulation to prevent this although there would be that trigger to the public option looming if the number of private NPOs dropped below a certain number of policy holders.

The party-of-no can say they prevented a government takeover of healthcare.
The blue doofs can continue to receive large contributions from the health denial companies.
The party of watered down progress can say they made historic blah blah blah to blah blah blah.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. as long as making predictions here is mine: The Public Option will be included
but it will include an "opt-out" for states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It will be at best a weak, 2% option.
It will be designed to fail by being set up to "capture" all the expensive, terminal cases that the privates want nothing to do with.

Health care "reform" is lost. This is about what I expected when Obama was elected, which is why I didn't really get behind him until it was down to the last 2 (every time I looked at Hillary I got a DLC tasete in my mouth). It seems pretty much in line with what I remember him talking about. I admit there were times when I had my hopes raised that there would be more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RDANGELO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. For what it's worth, heres mine.
At the last minute, about 54 Democrats will stick together, bypass all the rules, and insert a public option into the bill. The Republicans and Joe Lieberman will go crazy, but it won't do any good. The house will pass the exact same bill. thus eliminating the need for a conference and any more votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Sounds good to me.
Are we dreaming?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Does a PO that only includes 2% sound like a dream or a nightmare?
I keep saying that if there is a mandate to buy private insurance that I will refuse to buy it but if it was a private NPO I would seriously consider it if it was a reasonable cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC