Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember the Equal Rights Amendment?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:22 AM
Original message
Remember the Equal Rights Amendment?
Looks like it's time to bring it back to end sex discrimination. I think it could be extended to gay rights to marry as well as women's rights to seek medical treatment for their reproductive health. This lastest push from the powerful religious right against the rights of certain demographics of the population means that we need the protection of a Constitutional amendment or they will continue to erode any rights we have gained in the last 100 years.

http://www.equalrightsamendment.org/

The Equal Rights Amendment, first proposed in 1923, is still not part of the U.S. Constitution. The ERA has been ratified by 35 of the necessary 38 states. When three more states vote yes, the ERA might become the 28th Amendment. In these pages, find out about this historic amendment ... and join the effort to achieve equal rights for women and men.


We need to start pushing hard for this. It can be done. It will take the same dedication and determination that went into the Civil Rights movement of the sixties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, and I still find it stunning and dismaying that we never ratified it
we are essentially still second class citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hoya86 Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:00 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. redundant
it was redundant - 14th amendment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Incorrect
14th amendment
Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tonysam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. The women's suffrage amendment was needed
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 04:10 PM by tonysam
to overrule the 14th amendment regarding voting rights; there has never been a USSC ruling which says women are equal citizens to men. That's why the ERA came into being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. synchronicity: i was *just* thinking about the ERA.
kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. I can't believe this didn't pass thirty-some years ago, and it was tiresome to hear the idiotic
arguments trotted out against it, like If this passes, women will be forced to pee standing up

But :bounce: :bounce: :bounce: I'd love to jam it down the rightwing's throat any day we can

A list of the unratified states is here: http://www.equalrightsamendment.org/status.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Thanks for the link -
But it was something below the information about unratified states that caught my eye and choked me up:

"(3) Many do not know that a new Equal Rights Amendment was introduced on the floor of the Senate by Sen. Edward Kennedy the day after the initial ratification period had expired, or that it has been introduced in every Congress since 1982. The bills in Congress currently include one which would begin the entire ratification process over again, without a time limit."

He really was one of my heroes, my Senator. And we thought maybe his fervent hope and dream might be honored by finally passing a health care reform bill. He would be appalled by this turn of events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. a couple of days ago, I suggested that it was time to resurrect the National Women's Party--
and the first plank in my platform was ratification of ERA.

I was there for the whole battle--the lies, the distortions, the hatred. crossed swords with schlafly a number of times, too--what a piece of work SHE is.

one time, when she was whining that the ERA would require women in combat, I asked her why, if it was so awful for our daughters to go to war, it was so wonderful for our sons. she had no answer.

by the way, we are still fighting for it:

http://www.equalrightsamendment.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. And women are in combat. They always have been even before it was acknowledged.
They were the nurses in many wars and today they are in the midst of it in various capacities yet they are still second class citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. National Women's Party and the ERA are great ideas
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 03:54 PM by noiretextatique
that could energize the women's movement by attracting new generations of women :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. I really can't beleive the ERA never passed.
My mom told me that there was loads of hysteria, people spewing BS about unisex bathrooms and similar crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. There was the other BS, which I believed actually derailed ERA and that
BS was there were already laws on the books guaranteeing women's rights so it would be redundant. Hoho! Now we see how easily those laws can be weakened or even reversed. This is just the beginning. We have to push back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
14. Yep. 86 years of waiting is enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC