|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
warrior1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:14 PM Original message |
So Carrie Prejean has a sex tape, what law did she violate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal Veteran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
1. If? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:16 PM Response to Original message |
2. She didn't break any laws, but shes a hypocrite for criticizing others for their... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:28 PM Response to Reply #2 |
20. Exactly!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 10:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
33. You are entitled to your opinion - why isn't she? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-11-09 06:03 AM Response to Reply #33 |
47. Because her opinion is that gays are not acceptable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cmkramer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-11-09 12:56 AM Response to Reply #2 |
39. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:17 PM Original message |
Title 18 > Part 1 > Chapter 110 > Section 2257 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
14. Well, that was a pretty specific response! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:26 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. I work in the business |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulsby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 09:13 PM Response to Reply #17 |
29. i've investigated similar cases |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:30 PM Response to Original message |
21. LOL. Nothing like serving up the answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
deutsey (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-11-09 06:14 AM Response to Original message |
48. Well, all righty then. That answers that. Next question? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sebastian Doyle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-11-09 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
52. Would it be correct to assume that specific section/law was a result of the Traci Lords situation? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-11-09 05:52 PM Response to Reply #52 |
55. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
3. First off, it's the hypocrisy. Second off, it may not be a 'boyfriend' tape. She may be lying about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
4. dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Booster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
5. She violated the laws of hypocrisy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
opihimoimoi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. This one falls into the WORST OF WIVES CATEGORY.....Who would wanna marry that attention whore? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Booster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:26 PM Response to Reply #11 |
18. That and she's a snippity little shit too. I'm not against her for her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 10:19 PM Response to Reply #18 |
36. I blame Perez Hilton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-11-09 02:20 AM Response to Reply #36 |
42. oh please--that stupid contest was televised--so it wasn't like her answer was unheard by anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-11-09 12:24 PM Response to Reply #42 |
50. The viewership for beauty pageants has declined rapidly over the last few decades |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrModerate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
6. The whole "sexting" kerfuffle is wingnut hysteria, indicative of the fact . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrior1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
7. sometimes when a girl is pretty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrior1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:20 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. does anyone know what state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:25 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. It doesn't matter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jesus_of_suburbia (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
8. Well she thinks gays shouldn't be married because the Bible tells her so. The Bible doesn't approve |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
9. The law of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
warrior1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
12. If it was California this is the code |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:31 PM Response to Reply #12 |
22. US law trumps state law |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:23 PM Response to Original message |
13. Hypocrisy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMMNG (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:24 PM Response to Original message |
15. Nobody said she broke any laws |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kskiska (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:28 PM Response to Original message |
19. She violated her contract. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kayakjohnny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
23. Saw her on Hannity and thought, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ruby the Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
24. Miss California contract - no nude pics/videos in your past. This was not a criminal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
25. She violated the laws of karma by having prejudicialized others while |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kayakjohnny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 09:07 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. No, but it should be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-11-09 05:43 AM Response to Reply #27 |
46. Methinks so. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rrneck (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
26. The law of averages. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 09:10 PM Response to Original message |
28. She didn't violate any laws that I know of. What she did violate was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wordpix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 09:17 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Berry Cool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 09:20 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. How do you know she's being a typical rightie? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 09:24 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-11-09 02:08 AM Response to Reply #31 |
40. ROFL, Berry! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 10:08 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. You never did anything stupid in your youth? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SeattleGirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-11-09 02:11 AM Response to Reply #34 |
41. Sure I did. But Prejean is a walking, talking hipocrite, and continues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
customerserviceguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 10:17 PM Response to Original message |
35. I don't seem to recall her being possibly charged |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
provis99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
37. she was underage? Isn't that distribution of child porn? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Nov-10-09 10:59 PM Response to Original message |
38. Being underage, she violated child porn laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spike89 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-11-09 03:10 AM Response to Original message |
43. My guess, another lie |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-11-09 12:34 PM Response to Reply #43 |
51. I agree with you about her "I was under age" ruse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MisterP (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-11-09 03:39 AM Response to Original message |
44. the laws of common sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-11-09 12:48 PM Response to Reply #44 |
54. That was my very first thought, as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-11-09 04:58 AM Response to Original message |
45. Don't know about laws, but she broke the pageant's rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-11-09 06:14 AM Response to Original message |
49. She's a fugging hypocrite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-11-09 12:45 PM Response to Original message |
53. That's her claim, and tell me why all of a sudden you believe her? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed Apr 17th 2024, 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC