Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hasan wanted muslim soldiers to be exempted from fighting muslims...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 02:34 PM
Original message
Hasan wanted muslim soldiers to be exempted from fighting muslims...
Presumably killing Jews, Christians and the ever-popular targets Atheists would be fair game...

Personally, I humbly propose a sliding scale of "conscientiousness": snuff a Christian if directly ordered, but pop off the heathens on one's own impetus for fun and advancement. They could offer double points for Jews on Saturday, and offing a non-believer on a major holy day might merit a gift certificate for, say, sporting events.

When one joins the military, one signs away one's right to affiliation beyond this organization. One should still refuse to do things that are clear war crimes, but granting privileged status to those of one's own religion underlines one of the key anti-social problems with religion: it demands aristocracy, and "others" really just don't count for much. Well, I guess they're good for bragging rights when bringing them to heel, maybe, but that's about it.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/09/AR2009110903618.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hasan wanted all his colleagues and patients dead and did his best to pull it off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hasan sounds like all the Neo-Nazis, ex-con's and street gang members in the military...
they think that they can write their own rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Have we lost our reasoning friggin minds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. All this bs about him is CYA for all the people who should have seen this coming.
How many doctors worked with him? How many officers? How many intel people monitored his net surfing or posts?

They all let it go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. yep. This highly disturbed man was promoted and shuffled off to Ft Hood on his way to
Afghanistan. While we don't know that his colleagues didn't express their concerns, we do know that his supervisors were negligent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Yes, Yes, Yes, Cali - His supervisors were negligent!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
22. Perhaps political correctness gone awry. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. Imho, it's simpler than that. We don't take mental illness seriously
in this country, not at all. And we don't seem to learn from these terrible deaths. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. True but I believe that PC would make that even less likely in this case.
Hasan's superiors and peers probably hesitant to signal out a Muslim doctor as being mentally ill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. I'd hope that this group, which can't be all white Protestant males
would have better skills than that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #32
54. OTOH, there are some unconscionable powerplayers who would like nothing more than for
an incident like Ft Hood to occur so that they can reinforce the idea that we are at 'war' with Islam.

They probably noted Hasan's frail condition long ago and were counting on him snapping eventually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #32
55. You mean religion, or secular mental illness?
It's hard for a rational mind to square observable reality with the fantastical, and that causes insanity in some cases and amplifies it in others. The real problem is that since religion is defined is some untouchable pure goodness and penultimate aspect of life, those who are whacked out of their skulls but wafting about in a beatific religious zeal often slip through the cracks.

The insane parents who hear voices and then kill their children would often be interrupted in their insanity if it didn't have some glorious religious component, and the children would live. With religion exalted as an unquestionable good, those in its grips who haven't been able to keep on an even keel are free to do as they please.

We're taught to consider religious people and especially clergy as inherently "good", and that idiotic bigotry is hard to shake. Personally, I see certainty as a failing, and supernatural certainty as generally a danger, but that's just me...

This guy is the poster child for being above reproach: he's an officer (superior), a chaplain (good by definition) and a psychiatrist (possessed of all the rest of the keys of wisdom, and by definition saner than the rest of us weirdos) and it brings to question what kind of person needs that kind of irreproachability. The list of characteristics of those who need blank-check superiority is a pretty nauseating one, after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #55
57. Irreproachability -- that's an interesting observation.
I didn't know he was also a chaplain.

For someone who has worked that hard to get all those badges, it could be pretty unbearable to suddenly find himself categorically and impersonally reviled because of his ancestry or culture, both more or less out of his own control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 01:28 AM
Response to Reply #57
58. Don't confuse culture with religion
Religion is a choice, and it's one for which one should be held accountable.

There's a general acceptance that religion is "off limits" when it comes to criticism of one's actions, and I find that extremely dangerous to society. It stems from the generally held assumption that religion is "good", which I strongly dispute, and I find that many people use this as a shield for their various transgressions.

I don't mean to be combative with you here, but I simply don't hold religion in much esteem at all; I find it to be, for most people, a convenient short-cut and excuse, one borne out of a desire for immunity and privilege, and I don't think that the concept of religion "plays fair" in a pluralist society. What's worse is that it glories in its presumption of superiority.

As always with early reactions to extreme events, peoples' prejudices boil to the surface; as the story develops, we'll see many more aspects of Hasan's journey, and they'll probably defy most attempts to make his life a simplistic touchstone for personal causes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
36. Correct. The PC understanding BS doublespeak is not working, but the death toll is mounting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Usually the people who complain about PC doublespeak
are those that are unclear on the concept "discrimination". And the death toll is not mounting because of PC doublespeak but because no one is really taking care of soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chatnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
50. Completely
They completely turned a blind eye to this man and his mental instability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. Bingo nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. oy vey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. And some, especially those contractors, make sport out of killing Muslims in Iraq..
That's just as bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. in england, cops are allowed to get away with this crap
for example, a muslim constable was allowed to get a new assignment since he didn't want to guard the israeli embassy.

and rubbish like that.

that may fly in the british constabulatory, but not in the US military.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601085&sid=aOvp8_fVVFsA&refer=europe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I would grant them that right
If they refuse to guard jews then they should be free to do so, just not while being a uniformed police officer.

So turn in your badge and whistle and best of luck with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. works for me
what next? anti-choice cops refuse to guard clinics?

not gonna fly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. It's like the pharamcists
who refused to give out birth control, or that bus driver lady who wouldn't drive a bus with an atheist ad on it.

Fine you don't have to do anything that goes against your beliefs. But you also aren't guaranteed a job that will cater to your beliefs either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Well said. nt
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 03:54 PM by snagglepuss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. That's outrageous. In fact that should be grounds for dismissal. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
29. i knew a cop at WTO
who was on the riot squad who was strongly against WTO

it didn't stop him from standing the line, on a riot squad, during WTO.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
34. How's our way working so far?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. As an atheist
I don't believe people have souls, could I be exempt from having to kill people whom I think are soulless?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morning Dew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. How much actual fighting do psychiatrists do, again, please?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. Its not about him as a shrink. He doenst want any Muslim soldier to be required
to kill Muslims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
12. Nice. The New York Post version of what he Actually Said.
"It's getting harder and harder for Muslims in the service to morally justify being in a military that seems constantly engaged against fellow Muslims."

"Muslim Soldiers should not serve in any capacity that renders them at risk to hurting/killing believers unjustly."

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Oh, but...
"Muslim Soldiers should not serve in any capacity that renders them at risk to hurting/killing believers unjustly."

Being at risk of hurting/killing unbelievers unjustly is OK then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
52. Straw man.
Because I criticize OP for misparaphrasing doesn't imply that I condone the statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Withywindle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. Well, the direct quote in the statement is definitely worth a critique on its own.
It hardly exonerates the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
35. Who defines unjustly? The essence of being in the military is that you
obey orders, you don't question them. The military isn't a debating society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #35
51. You always question them
or you end up with Haditha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. Some circumstances may require questionning but a soldier's duty is to obey
commands, not to question them. I'm not saying that is morally right but that is the reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. During WWII, weren't there groups (units) of Japanese-American soldiers that were formed and
didn't they only send those units to Europe rather than the Pacific in order to avoid this very "conflict?"

In today's wars, with the emphasis on killing Muslims, wouldn't that be a prudent move by the military?

Of course, expecting the military to act prudently is itself insane...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I think if muslims were segretated in to special units
people would have a problem with it.

During wwII we also rounded up americans of japanese in to concentration camps.

We did alot back then that wouldn't fly today.

Imagine if obama were to propose camps for muslims, segregated military service for muslims, and nuking mecca. How do you think that would go?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. And did they send Germna American soldiers only to Japan? How about Italian Americans?
The way we treated Japanese Americans was shameless. And your post reflects bigotry. I know you don't mean it that way but the paternalism is sickening. And your post is redolent with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Amazingly, I agree with everything you say. Thanks for the "correction."
I had not thought about the US sending German- and Italian-American soldiers to Europe. You are correct - it (J-A units only to Europe) reflects, not a sensitivity on the part of our government back then but a prejudiced view that soldiers of Japanese descent could not be trusted if they were faced with a face that looked like themselves.

I can come off as paternalistic - my daughter calls it being an asshole. I am glad that you realize that I was not meaning to be bigoted - it just comes out that way sometimes (a lot)?.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #20
38. Kudos to you for such a civil reply.
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #20
39. Thanks. Kudos to you.
And no, I know you didn't mean it the way it came off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. As I posted elsewhere, my German grandfather was sent
to the Philippines and Okinawa. Wouldn't surprise me if they did send Germans only to the Pacific.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #30
46. A quick glance at
the listings of American servicemen awarded the MoH in WW2 quickly disproves that line of thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. My German grandfather got sent to the Pacific. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
49. Japanese-Americans also served in Pacific theater. Majority served in Europe, but thousands also
served in the Pacific and Asia. Primarily in noncombat roles as interpreters, interrogators, and in intel. But some also served in front line combat operations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
18. Then in WWII we should have exempted Christian soldiers from fighting Christians. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. Christyuns got no problem killing Christyuns
they do it all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. muslims have no problem killing muslims
happens all the time

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snagglepuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. DING. DING. DING. We have a winner.
Hammer meets nail. That really is the crux of the matter and why Hasan's position is such BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #33
44. Good thing Muslims never kill -- wait. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #33
47. Neither do Muslims
Think Seljuk Turks and Ottomans. Their empires were built on conquest of other muslims. Certainly in Iraq and Afghanistan, Pakistan, Muslims seem relativley comfortable killing other Muslims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
24. That desire alone has me nearly convinced he's a terrorist
I'm still not completely convinced he's not legally insane, but I'm damned close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
31. And many Xtian soldiers signed up to
kill Muslims. Check the graffiti on some of the bombs dropped on the Iraqi citizens.

Put simple - fuck all religion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
45. On DU we're only allowed to fuck one religion,
all the rest of the stupid skydaddy nonsense has to be respected. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. Not me. I don't respect any of them, except maybe Druids. And only the Reform Druids who worship
bushes, ala Capt. Spaulding.

Not those bushes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC