Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sanders would support reconciliation to break filibuster

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:00 AM
Original message
Sanders would support reconciliation to break filibuster
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/67123-sanders-would-support-reconciliation-to-break-filibuster


Sanders would support reconciliation to break filibuster
By Tony Romm - 11/10/09 07:34 AM ET



A leading Senate independent on Monday stressed he would support using reconciliation to break a filibuster and bring healthcare reform to a conclusive vote.

That affirmation, offered Monday night by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt), perhaps eases lingering concerns among Democrats that the Vermont lawmaker could buck the majority party on procedural votes and further jeopardize the chamber's healthcare bill future.

"I think the role that is now attempting to play on health care is very, very unfortunate," Sanders told MSNBC in an interview, noting Lieberman's intended filibuster is precisely why he wanted his fellow independent sanctioned last year for stumping with GOP presidential candidate Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).

"The American people overwhelmingly want a public option for a variety of reasons," he added. "Correctly, they want a choice between a private insurance company and a Medicare-type plan. And they should have that choice."

And when asked whether he would support reconciliation in the event Lieberman and other Democrats blocked consideration of the bill, Sanders said: "Absolutely. Look, the trick here is to do the best that we can for the American people."

"And that is quality, affordable health care for all of our people," he added. "If we can`t do it because we don`t get 60 votes, then there are other ways that we have to proceed. And I would strongly support those other ways."

more...

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/67123-sanders-would-support-reconciliation-to-break-filibuster
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hey Dennis, this is what a real Progressive looks like!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Notice he is NOT a Democrat
Democrats, by definition, these days are not Progressives..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Good lord... just tell us who is and who isn't... how about that?
Kerry?

Feingold?

Boxer?

This fucking True ProgressiveTM bullshit is fucking tired. Kucinich has PLENTY of progressive DEMS he could take a lesson on productivity from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. "Any thing you can progress, I can progress better...."
"No, you can't!"

"Yes, I can!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't see how you get a decent bill without it
The only way to get 60 for cloture would be to castrate this bill even more than it already has been.

Let Lieberman, Nebraska Nelson, Lincoln and a couple of others have their temper tantrums, then we roll right over them and pass the damn thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. Had to kind of laugh at the lede.
It would be extremely difficult to not be a "leading Senate independent".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well, there is Lieberman...unfortunately. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The writing's a bit strange.
My favorite is the temporally challenged "noting Lieberman's intended filibuster is precisely why he wanted his fellow independent sanctioned last year for stumping with GOP presidential candidate."

In other words, he wanted to have Lieberman censured for stumping with McCain in 2008. Why? Because Lieberman in late 2009 threatened to filibuster this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC