Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Arguing With An Idiot: Glenn Beck's Lawsuit Against Parody Site Rejected

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:25 AM
Original message
Arguing With An Idiot: Glenn Beck's Lawsuit Against Parody Site Rejected

by Wendy Davis, Friday, November 6, 2009, 7:24 PM


An arbitrator has rejected controversial talk show host Glenn Beck's contention that the domain name glennbeckrapedandmurderedayounggirlin1990.com infringes his trademark. World Intellectual Property Organization arbitration panelist Frederick Abbott ruled Friday that the less-than-flattering domain name was protected by fair use principles because the URL, when combined with the site's content, constitutes protected speech.

Glenn Beck- Arguing With An IdiotAbbott wrote that the site's creator, Isaac Eiland-Hall, "can be said to be making a political statement," which is a "legitimate non-commercial use" of Beck's name.

Eiland-Hall had argued that the site parodied Beck by using the same rhetorical techniques that Beck uses on the air. In legal papers filed on his behalf by First Amendment lawyer Marc Randazza, he referenced a YouTube clip of Beck interviewing Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), a Muslim, during which Beck asked Ellison to prove that he was "not working with our enemies."

Eiland-Hall also argued that the site doesn't infringe on Beck's trademark because there's no likelihood that Web users wrongly think he's affiliated with it. "Only an abject imbecile could believe that the domain name would have any connection to the complainant," Randazza wrote.

<snip>

http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=116991
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. LMAO
"Only an abject imbecile could believe that the domain name would have any connection to the complainant,"

The comedy just writes itself, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Typical republicon Chickenhawk: FAIL & Whine
FAIL & Whine
FAIL & Whine
FAIL & Whine
FAIL & Whine
FAIL & Whine
FAIL & Whine
FAIL & Whine
FAIL & Whine
FAIL & Whine
FAIL & Whine
FAIL & Whine
FAIL & Whine
FAIL & Whine
FAIL & Whine
FAIL & Whine
FAIL & Whine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Clown Blecch talks a good line about defending the Constitution
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 08:01 AM by Cirque du So-What
but displays his narcissistic streak by wanting to cast it aside for selfish purposes.

Listen up, Beckerheads: Your hero clearly can dish it out, but he sure as hell can't take it!

What now, Glennie? Couldn't bend the Constitution to your will, so will you return to the air and squirt a few Vicks Vapo Rub tears for your enraptured fans? Maybe wear - on air - that pseudo-Nazi uniform from your book cover? That might impress some of the more feeble-minded among your fanbase, but eveyone else will see you for the big ol' man-baby you truly are. Weak sauce, and not at all what I'd expect from such a 'heroic' figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gwsuperfan Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. The first amendment was wearing a chastity belt
so Glenn Beck couldn't rape and murder it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gwsuperfan Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. The site is still up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. Only an abject imbecile would be listening to Beckkk in the first place
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gwsuperfan Donating Member (84 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. So his target demographic might be confused
Fortunately, the "moron in a hurry" legal standard says that they can be confused, and it's still not infringement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Lane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. After winning, the site owner relinquished the domain name to Beck
Edited on Wed Nov-11-09 03:35 AM by Jim Lane
According to , Eiland-Hall gave Beck the username and password for the site, and it is currently dead.

As noted by Gwsuperfan above, the same material (with some added reportage about the WIPO decision against Beck) is still available at <http://gb1990.com/>.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
9. Well, that is becks' audience

"Only an abject imbecile could believe that the domain name would have any connection to the complainant," Randazza wrote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC