Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

senate introduces law to fight rape kit backlog

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 04:35 AM
Original message
senate introduces law to fight rape kit backlog
Senate Introduces Law to Fight Rape Kit Backlog
US Senator Al Franken (D-MN) introduced a bill late last week that will address the national backlog of untested rape kits. The "Justice for Survivors of Sexual Assault Act" was co-sponsored by Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), and Orrin Hatch (R-UT), according to the Minnesota Independent.

According to Human Rights Watch, there are approximately 200,000 reported rapes each year and, in most cases, DNA evidence is collected and stored in a "rape kit." In 2004, Congress passed the Debbie Smith Act, which authorized the use of federal funds to test DNA kits. However, the law did not specify that the DNA kits be rape kits. Earlier this year, Human Rights Watch discovered that Los Angeles had a backlog of over 12,500 untested rape kits in spite of having received about $8 million Debbie Smith Act funds, and a backlog of 10,000 untested rape kits in Detroit. There are no current national statistics regarding the number of untested rape kits, because no state or federal laws mandate law enforcement agencies collect this information.

"These backlogs have serious consequences for law enforcement and public safety," Franken said in a press release. "We just learned of a case where a rapist struck both a pregnant woman and a minor while the rape kit for one of his earlier victims sat unprocessed at a crime lab. It takes about a week to process a DNA evidence sample and there is no reason that every rape kit completed should not be tested in a timely manner."

If passed, the act would require that states pay the cost of rape kit examinations upfront, that survivors are informed of their right to a free rape kit examination, and creates monetary incentives to reduce rape kit backlogs, process rape kits quickly, and report backlog numbers. It also creates a nation-wide annual reporting mechanism for rape kit backlogs, funds the training of sexual assault forensic medical personnel, and defines "trained examiner" in a way that will allow rural and tribal areas, where incidence of rape is disproportionately high, to access grant funds.

http://www.msmagazine.com/news/uswirestory.asp?ID=12064

(so my question is, why has no accounting of the debbie smith money been demanded? where did all this money go?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AnneD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm still waiting for them to process the rape kit....
from the Bush Administration, let alone the kit for the assault that Wall Street and The Fed Reserve has done to the middle class in this country on Obama's watch. .Vaseline and a condom would be greatly appreciated next time boys. Good luck getting justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. "a backlog of 10,000 untested rape kits in Detroit"
Edited on Tue Nov-10-09 11:10 AM by lukasahero
Just in Detroit. 10,000 rape kits. Potentially 10,000 rapes. Jesus wept.

And yeah, I want to know where the money went. Obviously to something far more important than investigating rape. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. The lack of interest here is stunning. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. The NOW program on PBS did an excellent segment on this. It's truly shocking.
I had absolutely no idea that rape kits were not even being processed. Disgraceful.

Kudos to Sen. Franken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brigid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. You know what the saddest part of this is?
That there are so many rapes in the first place. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
10. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
11. About fucking time!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-11-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. Kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC