Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Secret Hold Placed On Senate Electronic Filing Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 04:40 AM
Original message
Secret Hold Placed On Senate Electronic Filing Bill
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/04/18/secret-hold-placed-on-senate-electronic-filing-bill/

Today Russ Feingold and Dianne Feinstein brought S.223, the Senate electronic disclosure bill, to the floor for a unanimous consent vote. When they asked if there was any objection, Sen. Lamar Alexander, filling in for the minority leadership, announced that he had an objection, indicating that some Senator in the Republican caucus has placed a secret hold on the disclosure bill.


Secret holds are an anethema... Why are they permitted? What is the "good government" purpose for this device?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 04:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. cover up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 05:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Why The Heck Haven't The Dems Been Using Secret Holds?
So much could have been stopped along the way. And tit for tat is the only thing publicans understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. That's what I want to know!!
Hey Harry! How about that, huh??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Not in Robert's Rules of Order
that I can recall.

Must be Senate Rules???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-19-07 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
6. For a country that's supposed to have a government of the
people, for the people, and by the people, there sure is a lot of secret sneaky stuff we don't hear about until way after the face.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC