Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Favored chromosome status?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madamesilverspurs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:04 PM
Original message
Favored chromosome status?


Should Medicaid Pay for Viagra?
By Arthur Arrons
Published: 8/3/2009

Erectile Dysfunction medications are not getting cheaper, lets look more into Medicaid and if they should pay for the popular Impotence medication Viagra


Viagra is the first erectile dysfunction pill approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration.

Viagra has become part and parcel of the lives of people with erectile dysfunction that there is even a Federal policy requiring the Medicaid programs to finance the medication of those who have valid prescriptions for Viagra. The policy, which was approved during the incumbency of former President, created a stir among governors who insisted that Medicaid coverage for Viagra users should be an option for the state and not dictated by the Federal government.

The States of Wisconsin and New York signaled the protest versus Viagra by declaring that they will defy the Federal policy. Governors, who claimed they were not consulted about this matter, said that over 40% of the costs for Medicaid are paid for by the states. Medicaid coverage for Viagra is expected to reach $100 million annually.

The Federal health Care Financing Administration however insisted that the states’ Medicaid programs should include Viagra in their coverage when it has been prescribed by the doctors to treat patients with erectile dysfunction problems. Pfizer, the company behind the drug, has requested Medicaid coverage for Viagra in all states.

The New York State Health Department has taken a different tactic saying it opposes the Medicaid coverage of Viagra patients because it is concerned about the possible effects of Viagra on the patients especially those who have chronic conditions.

Viagra is generally safe but the label itself warns that it should not be used by patients who are using nitrates, a substance present in medications for those with heart problems.

The Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services has declared it will not provide coverage for Viagra because it is not medically necessary.

Medicaid coverage for Viagra can however be halted if it is shown that it is being abused financially and clinically.

In the meantime, residents of States that refuse to provide coverage for Viagra would be forced to buy Viagra for $8 to $10 for every pill they need in the process of treating erectile dysfunction.

Find more great news article in the Edguider News section. Find and research Viagra online or discuss Erectile Dysfunction with others.

---
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. That would more correctly be "Most Favored Chromosome" Status
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sorry. Buy the impotent old farts a cock ring and a vibrator for their
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 08:25 PM by MineralMan
partners. Until women's reproductive rights are fully covered, there should be no government payments for boner drugs. That's my opinion.

And I'm an old fart myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mira Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Seconded and Kicked and Recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. More gender war porn. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. When people aren't dying for lack of health care, and
women have full reproductive health coverage, then I'll entertain the idea of paying for boner drugs for impotent old men. Until then, consider alternative sexual practices.

And I'm a man. So there goes your gender war.

Again, get basic health care for everyone and we'll talk again. If someone dies but you get boner pills, you're just plain wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It is a minor issue at best. To raise it to the level of importance on par with abortion access
is ridiculous.

One can discuss the issues separately and should.

Some people get their jollies with gender war porn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC