Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

single payer became a robust public option.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:20 PM
Original message
single payer became a robust public option.
a robust public option became a weak public option became no real public qualifies for any real option at all.

universal coverage became cover the uninsured became cover a few of the uninsured.

rein in the insurance companies became mandates with fines and jail time for those who do not do business with the insurance cabal.

Change we can (finally) believe in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Single Payer was never on the table. You weren't listening to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. single payer was on the table until Obama took it off after inauguration
in one of his few acts of actual leadership since coming to power.

single payer was part of Obama's own position as late as early in the primaries

YOU weren't listening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. He never supported Single Payer as a Candidate.
He said it would be ideal IF we didn't have the current system that exists.
He never, not once, said he would support its passage.

Your hearing must be selective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. He did not reject single payer (which he had vocally supported previously)
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 07:10 PM by branders seine
until he emerged as one of the major primary candidates and released a sketchy health care plan.

Even then, he opposed mandates, which he now champions. He insisted on insurance industry cost controls through a public option for every American, which he rejected along about the time of his then-secret meetings with Pharma.

Defending Obama's actions now as consistent with what he said during his campaign is laughable.


Besides, Obama is only part of our problem--and not the worst of our problem. He won't be around all that long, but the corporatism that now openly runs our country will be here until the revolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. Congress fucked over this bill, not the president.
Blame the White House for not leading with all its might, maybe, but the semifinal product we're able to criticize now has little to do with President Obama.

Until we cam, in one election, replace five hundred or more members of Congress with better ones, don't expect any miracles. This is incremental change, and rickety and corrupt as it is, it's about the best we could reasonably expect out of the Hill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cherchez la Femme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. No, but Obama seems to have misplaced his bully pulpit
He SAID he had it, but it's never been seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. It worked pretty well when he needed to rally support for trillions
of dollars for the banks (and a few measly hundred millions for stimulus).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
23. Just because he said stuff doesn't make it right.
It just makes it his.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. I'd really like to know what he gained.
What was the deal?

$$$$$?

Power?

Staving off a threat to his family, or his kneecaps?

What was it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. All that matters is we lay the groundwork
Personally, this approach would have been better if they just said "Medicare for All"

But still - build on something there, rather than thin air...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. "build on" is nonsense.
If clear majorities can't get it any closer to right than this abomination, Democrats sure won't "build on" anything when they lose seats in 2010.

This program was designed to fail, and fail it will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Who is elected today is not who will be elected 5, 10 years from now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Damn right it won't be.
(Although perhaps not the way you think.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. You would be surpsied where my sympathies lie...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. I'm a fan of yours Taverner,
but this bill can be "built on" in only the wrong way. It is no basis for a progressive health care future. It will make things substantively worse, not better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Yes, the Senate bill is a huge concession to the insurance industries
Basically we are paying them off

We need the Public Option though

But the insurance reform items are key
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
27inCali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
27. nice defeatism there
that defeatism is also part of the reason why it's so hard to get good progressive legislation through, so many lefties are incapable of making hard decisions -hard compromises to achieve a certain goal and the first time they are asked to make a painful trade off, they throw up their hands in defeat and start pushing a defeatist meme with all their fellow Progressives. In war, you lose some battles, and some losses are incredibly painful, but if you wanna win the war, you take the loss and keep fighting.

as much as many DUers would like to paint themselves as champions of the downtrodden, it's hard to imagine such a bunch of defeatist retreat monkeys lasting long enough to be the champion of anyone or anything. If you aren't strong enough take a hit and come back, get out of the way, don't just stand there and work to discourage everyone else...

politics is deeply disappointing by nature. The people who eventually get what they want are the ones who know how to swallow that disappointment and come right back swinging.

and if you do want to paint yourself as some sort of hero or champion of goodness and righteousness and everything Progressive, you'd better understand the number one prerequisite of being a hero -LASTING.

this fight aint over yet. I don't care if it looks bad, there's too many people counting on us not to give up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Well then you can march down and tell the 18 million that will remain
uninsured in 2019 all about the painful sacrifices "you've" had to make.

You know those folks, they are the same folks that have landed on the 'painful tradeoff" list for the last 40 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. If the votes weren't allegedly there now, what makes you think they will be later?
This 'foot in the door' BS is getting old, because the Republicans / Conservative Democrats are about to chop off that foot.

At LEAST a Strong Public Option, without any giveaways to the Insurance Industry.

White House - Check
Senate - Check
House of Reps - Check
2/3 of the American People - Check

What is the problem?
:shrug:

White House - Suspect
Senate - Suspect
House of Reps - Suspect
2/3 of the American People still want at least a Strong Public Option, without any giveaways to the Insurance Industry. - Check

Again, what is the problem with support?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Because We Democrats had to make some very dubious sacrifices
Consider how many Blue Dogs are in the House and Senate




-------------------------


We need to keep the Democratic Congresscritters like Pelosi and jettison the ones like Baucus (or even Reid for that matter - he could have done some serious good, and he pissed it away)

I am just looking to the future, that's all

The day may never come, but better to have it when it is, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. Do you realize how politics works?
This may indeed be a "foundation", but it will be at least a decade until this gets touched again. No reasonable politician is going to expend his or her political clout to revise a major piece of legislation that was "just passed". I'd bet hard earned money that whatever passes now will be the law of the land until AT LEAST the 2020's.

Social Security was passed in 1935 following a political fight not unlike the one we're seeing today. It was reopened for debate in 1939 because the original funding model was flawed, and the subsequent fight very nearly eliminated it right then and there. Of all the expansions that backers were hoping to get into the 1939 amendments, only one (a coverage increase for single mothers) actually made it in. After that, it was considered such a hot potato that nobody touched it again until the 1950's.

Many of the people on DU today will be long dead before this "groundwork" is ever developed into anythinng remotely similar to "Medicare For All".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
27inCali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. I'm under no illusion that this will be done quickly
some of us have kids and are thinking about what kind of world they will be raising their kids in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. Don't forget the anti-abortion blob that will ooze into every nook and cranny of govt-funded
programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. THIS is the shit we should be fighting IMO
This is the kind of shit that sets policy down the road
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. I have a dollar. I can split it any way I want. So...you get 1 cent. I keep the other 99 cents.
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 06:32 PM by Selatius
That's what is happening in Congress between liberal politicians and everybody else. The liberals get 1 cent.

The Public Option in the House bill is very small and likely will not stir up enough competition to really bring down costs. There are other mechanisms in the bill that may serve to slow the bleeding, such as a ban on excluding people with pre-existing conditions, but to be sure, the bleeding will continue, just at a slower pace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. The telling thing
about this sequence of events is how little principled commitment there was to actually enacting healthcare reform.

Fuck all the sorry politicians who lacked the political skill, the intestional fortitude, the personal committment, the humanity, and the compassion to have done better. They'll likely not be getting my vote whgen they seek re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. bingo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Very sad...and very true. There really was no political will for healthcare reform..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. What you said.
I totally agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jesus_of_suburbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. The man in your avatar
would agree with you. And I think he would have fought damn hard for it too.

R.I.P.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
27inCali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
26. you can't lay it all at Obama's feet
he's got a lot of soulless fucks to get around in the House and Senate (He's not a dictator you know).

just stop looking for easy answers like "blame that guy! ok, problem solved" -no.

so much of the reason why this country is hurting so bad is that people are fucking mentally lazy and have allowed so much garbage to go on and have turned around and blamed some ridiculous scape goat instead accepting the hard truth about how wide-spread corruption is everywhere in our government and how much we are at fault for letting ourself be distracted by stupid divisive social issues fights that don't change any laws or minds.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-10-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. I don't.
Just the parts where he has failed to lead or has led in the wrong direction are his fault.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC