Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No Gov't Money For Women! Forget them and their reproductive health!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mullard12ax7 Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:43 PM
Original message
No Gov't Money For Women! Forget them and their reproductive health!
If it means more of us do get health care then it has to be done right? Seriously, that's the logic being used in this bigoted as hell Stupak amendment and a poll right here also suggests that the health care bill with the Stupak amendment is better than no bill at all.

NO GOVERNMENT MONEY FOR WOMENS HEALTH -- WHO'S WITH ME?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe women should stop having sex with men until women's
reproductive health is covered.

I know. NOT a popular idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. There has never been any Federal funding for abortions.
Is this what Healthcare Reform is about?
Not even close.

Quit playing the Wedge game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes, there was... before the fucking Hyde Amendment was passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aramchek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Healthcare Reform is not the place to attempt to repeal the Hyde amendment
HCR will not be scrapped just to get Government funded abortions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Well, it sure as hell isn't the place to expand the number of women
affected by it either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Thank You! Several times over. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Breast cancer? Let it eat 'em up. Then they'll die quickly. Yay!!!! Who needs to help women?
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 06:34 PM by valerief
Not America.
:sarcasm:
for the sarcasm-impaired
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sadly, 8 years of Nazi-era Bush/Cheney
Preceded by eight years of Bill the Republican, NAFTA is good for you Clinton, has left most Americans unable to think straight.

I just called my local Rep's office and asked to have them send me all 1,900 pages of the HC"R" bill. They had already reached their Quota of people that could be sent the bill.

If they cannot even implement sending out the bill, then how the F___ are they going to actually implement the regulations that the 1,900 pages contain?

I was told to use my computer, as if I had not already tried. The printer loads the 1,900 pages into memory, then tries to find the ten pages I want, then it crashes... if the Congress was not even smart enought to divide the damn thing into manageable pieces (Pt One, Pt Two Pt Three, Pt Four, Pt Five) each four hundred pieces or less, than how smart can this bill be?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Sounds like a problem with your PDF reader. Do you have an alternative one? n.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is this an example of hyperbole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. If you're republican, it's hyperbowl. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. State funding (Medicaid) will remain the same...
If your state covers it, fine. If not, start working on getting them to change it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC