Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Afghanistan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:56 AM
Original message
Poll question: Afghanistan
Seems the number has been decided: 34,000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Get the FUCK out now. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Get the fuck out.
What really amazes me is the pro-war crowd on DU. Had they said half the things about Iraq that they have for Afghanistan, they would have been banned.

And, to all the chest-thumpers, your arguments are no different nor are more just than those who defended involvement in Iraq.

This escalation is a bad bad bad decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. Do we know the new presidents plans?
I didn't vote, I don't have all the info needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I hope any new plan consists of something better than throwing
personnel and money at the mountains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. More troops.
There may be some snow job sale's pitch about a new strategy, but that 'new strategy' will involve another 30,000+ troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I missed that, where is it written?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. All Afghan War Options by Obama Aides Said to Call for More Troops
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/08/world/asia/08troops.html

Obama leaning toward 34,000 more troops for Afghanistan

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/227/story/78516.html

WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is nearing a decision to send more than 30,000 additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan next year, but he may not announce it until after he consults with key allies and completes a trip to Asia later this month, administration and military officials have told McClatchy.

As it now stands, the administration's plan calls for sending three Army brigades from the 101st Airborne Division at Fort Campbell, Ky. and the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum, N.Y. and a Marine brigade, for a total of as many as 23,000 additional combat and support troops.

Another 7,000 troops would man and support a new division headquarters for the international force's Regional Command (RC) South in Kandahar, the Taliban birthplace where the U.S. is due to take command in 2010. Some 4,000 additional U.S. trainers are likely to be sent as well, the officials said.

The first additional combat brigade probably would arrive in Afghanistan next March, the officials said, with the other three following at roughly three-month intervals, meaning that all the additional U.S. troops probably wouldn't be deployed until the end of next year. Army brigades number 3,500 to 5,000 soldiers; a Marine brigade has about 8,000 troops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. if you want to pretend like the Pentagon and the WH didn't send up this trial balloon
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 11:44 AM by bigtree
. . . that's your choice. But it would serve the cause of a rational end to the occupation to be more responsive to these entreaties by the administration and their military leadership so that, when they make their ultimate decision, you won't be caught flat-footed and your argument late and moot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I don't have an argument, I'm looking for facts.
So far I see might be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. By now we should...
Have closed Gitmo
Have pulled all armed forces out of conflicts
Have signed universal healthcare into law
Have secured jobs for all

I don't see this administration doing it...If they can't who can?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. +100000000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. We lost (again). Get out. Get over it. Now, it's just poltical CYA to stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Out! Now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC