Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are the Kucinich Defenders going to support efforts to defeat the bill in the Senate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:26 AM
Original message
Are the Kucinich Defenders going to support efforts to defeat the bill in the Senate?
If the bill is such an abomination, and if the mighty Dennis Kucinich was among the few wise and pure enough to see it, will you support efforts to defeat the bill in the Senate?

If yes, then does that include supporting Lieberman in his filibuster?

If not, then why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Dupe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Uh, no.
That other thread asked a specific question about Lieberman's planned filibuster.

My question is about more general efforts to oppose the bill, including but not limited to supporting Joe's filibuster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. My answer is the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Neither of those answers is really an answer, though
The question is very simple: if you oppose the bill, then do you support efforts to defeat it in the Senate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. They already sided with the Teabaggers and Michelle Bachmann.
So, there's no doubt that they're going to throw in with Tom Coburn and LIEberman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
13. My President might side with Dick Cheney on Afghanistan by that twisted logic
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #13
23. Dick Cheney doesn't have a vote.
Votes are very much a "with us or against us" moment.

If you line up with AHIP and Bachmann, you're against us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Well then


You are for us or you are against us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #24
42. When the matter comes to a vote, yes.
Michelle Bachmann or Alan Grayson--your choice.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Only if they remain consistent in their efforts to destroy Health Care Reform.
For most of these people, if it isn't the bill they want, they don't want anyone to have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. Women kicked under the bus. Long live health care "reform"!!
:puke: :puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Kucinich was happy to kick women under the bus for years
But this fact is conveniently overlooked by his acolytes while praising this prinnpled giant of a man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoJoWorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Don't bring up uncomfortable facts. DK has NO flaws, and has NEVER been wrong.
He is a superhero to his followers. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeycola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #9
26. Pay attention, I am not talking about DK. This is about women and reproductive
rights that the House has been happy to kick under the bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Oooo.... SNAP! Yes, people here forget DK was a Pro-Lifer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. and Barack Obama was vehemently against mandates
in the primaries :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. You realize how desperate that makes you look... comparing the issue of mandates to pro-choice
Mandates have a function in healthcare reform. An important one. They are necessary to make the system work. Even the French system has a mandate.

But changing your position on Choice? That's a fundamental opportunistic change made for a power grab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. People evolve over the course of their political life
When the President does it is an evolving world view, when Dennis does it he is a craven politician.

Heck Bill Clinton just came out in support of gay marriage this year after signing DOMA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. And Dennis continues to evolve... siding with Republicans and Lieberman. Got it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. As does the President
supporting FISA and the Patriot Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. did so many of the anti Kucinich crowd side with the Dems when
he voted against the Iraq war, when soooo many Dems voted with the republicans FOR it??
No, this is about their pom pom waving for Obama. thats all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Give me an O....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #21
45. That's a little forward, don't you think?
I mean, I hardly know you, and you didn't even buy me dinner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. Nothing to do with pom-poms at all. In fact, that's close to a non sequitur.
I don't think that anyone now on DU praised Dems for voting in favor of the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Appears to be quite a few cheerleading escalation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. Yeah, I'm being told that being against stupid wars is now for teabaggers.
Who the hell wants to be for stupid wars?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Some people never learned critical thinking skills
Quite a few on this thread...there are even people saying you are with us or against us, not realizing they are parotting the boy king from 2001-2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. Not quite sure what you're getting at
A vote about the wars as they stand today is very different from a vote to initiate either of those wars in years past.

I do not support escalation of either war, but I also accept that reality can leave us with no good alternatives.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. I support the reality that with out a draft
and sending an enormous amount of troops to either situation you are just throwing American kids into cannon fodder for a lost cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. I'm sure it's exactly that simple.
Short of reinstating the draft, do you support an immediate withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan, and to hell with the consequences?


I'm not saying that I have the answer, but it seems to me that we have a responsibility to clean up our mess over there (Karzai included).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. We did it in Vietnam
Now they are making our T-shirts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. I'm sure it's exactly that simple.
Look how well Afghanistan turned out the last time we abandoned them after a protracted period of military decimation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. Yes and I'm sure 34000 more American troops will turn them into
a western democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. If I'd made any argument along those lines, perhaps your post would make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
41. On another thread, someone said it was weak support that forced the allowance of Stupak's amendment.
And that in that way, Kucinich was party responsible for it being in the bill.

Seems like kind of a stretch, but I'm definitely curious about the details now.

His conversion from anti-choice to pro-choice came suspiciously close to his run for President... so if there's any chance that he still harbors anti-choice sentiments, well... anyway it's just interesting to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adamuu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. K&R for getting a grip already n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
18. I think the bill sucks. I don't see it as a step forward. If the pukes kill it I'll count that...
as them being the broken clock that happens to be right at the moment, although if it hadn't been for the republicans and the right wing of our party who tries to emulate and appease them the bill probably wouldn't be the heinous piece of shit it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
20. "It's not exactly perfect, so I want it to fail! WAAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!"
People with Kucinich's attitude should never be involved in politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. It is a steaming pile of shit masquerading as reform
How about that as a more apt description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #22
36. Tell that to people with pre-existing conditions
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #36
49. I have preexisting conditions.
This bill says I could not be discriminated against by insurance companies. It says nothing about how much I could be charged by those companies. Suppose they want to charge me more than I could afford? Big help that is. As for the public option, the CBO has said coverage may actually be more than private insurance. What then? What if I don't qualify for a subsidy?

Any bill that mandates insurance but does not open a serious pubic option to every American is bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
25. You've Proved Your Point Well My Friend...
I'm just grateful DK's vote didn't matter.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
30. either way, the insurance companies win
pass or defeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
38. wtf was there a fax?
Why are you guys going after him so hard? Something doesn't smell right...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
43. It's cute how you expected people to be serious.
At least a couple had the integrity to come out and admit they support the filibuster.

Not many though. Kinda sad, really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
44. Depends on what is in the bill n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
46. If it's a shit bill --
that is little more than a giveaway to the insurance industry, then yes I hope they do kill it. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. Thanks for the Fuck you sick person post!
I just love you guys!:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. I am one of those people, dumbass.
Multiple preexisting conditions, 100% uninsurable at any cost if I am not covered by an employer.

Mandatory insurance purchase + no price control + no access to a serious public opion by every Amercian = bull.

Plain and simple.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
47. Dennis Kucinich is playing political football with MY health.
And I fucking resent him everybit as much as I resent that asshole Liebermann.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x6970101
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC