Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:57 PM
Original message
Kucinich
He is a side show, at best. I often agree with him. I would never seriously support him if I could vote for him. Actually, he lost me way back we he went on a date with that nut from Texas, Ron Paul.

But geeze .... so much energy expended on him.

Why?

He voted late to make a point with which to grandstand, yet not be the one who killed the bill. Big deal. A stunt that was as effective as a fart in a windstorm.

Except to piss YOU off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. I will rec this one. It is exactly right. Fart in a windstorm.. Like the Cao vote. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. He is a side show
I think the DLC (blue dog) supporters are making most of the noise about Kucinch to take the heat off their side bolting from the rest of the Democrats in the vote.

A diversionary ploy if I ever saw one.

If Kucinich had voted for it they would have found someone else to bitch about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. Funny how many here on DU disagree with you folks...
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 12:04 AM by LakeSamish706
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. How is that disagreeing?
I'm glad he voted against it.

I find the fact that he voted when and as he did was clear evidence it was a meaningless, calculated stunt.

The two concepts are not mutually exclusive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I don't think it was a calculated stunt at all... He has been consistent in his voting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Yep, stinky is annoyed with the spamming OPs too. I think it is better not to feed with new OPs,
They rarely get above 5 anymore anyway, because everyone is onto them anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Uh ...... what are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think the 'grandstanding' is more than just a political stunt
It's his way of highlighting his (usually) minority stance. I often agree with him too. In the present makeup in Congress, his stances are often what we voted for, with the majority of our party racing to compromise our demands away. I really don't know how the uncompromising stances he takes can get any notice among all of the 'pragmatists' who whittle their promises down to nothing and often end up hurting the very causes they claimed to be advocating for. His 'grandstanding' is usually, actually the uncompromising stand on issues that many here voted for their legislators to represent and put into action or law. I wish more legislators would take his cue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. I wish they would as well and things might be very different for the American people as well. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Actually, these attack OPs remind me of freepers who attack the President. Facts don't seem to
matter.

Ever tried to convince a freeper that Al Gore is not trying to get rich? Same thing.

They will persist in their belief system no matter what you do, because they can't think past black and white and the HATE the man. These posts are so damn similar. You try to engage them in an actual nuanced discussion and they just won't participate, because they really don't want the "messy" truth. That might mess with thier ideology.

The amazing thing is they don't even see that what they are participating in is EXACTLY the same thing that is done to Obama daily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Kucinichians attack Obama as badly as any freepers do...
...but it's twice as bad, because they're supposed to be on the same side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. I seem to remember a big fuss here about labeling folks as 'Obamabots'
Your 'Kucinichians' smear reminds me of that tripe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. What he said about this sham of a so called healthcare =re-form is true
Wait until some time goes by . He is one of the few who has learned from past mistakes. Look at All of the politicins who have their hands in the medical corporations pockets and then tell anyone in their right mind we should trust any of this utter crap .

How the hell do they think they are going to control these massive ins companies who have had a death grip on people for decades? What and how and who will be the watch dogs to keep them in line ? Factor that into the cost because they will need another mass of employees to keep track of all the ins companies so subtract that from the so called savings over 10 fucking years.

They just pull numbers out of their assess and sell them like candy . By that time Obama will not be the president , funny how they all always project past their term limits and people buy into this shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC