Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do Iraqi's have a mandate to buy health insurance from private corporations?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:25 PM
Original message
Do Iraqi's have a mandate to buy health insurance from private corporations?
Why are the nations we're building receiving evil "socialism"?
You'd better sit down, folks.

Article 31 of the Iraqi Constitution, drafted by your right-wing Bushies in 2005 and ratified by the Iraqi people, includes state-guaranteed (single payer) healthcare for life for every Iraqi citizen.

Article 31 reads:

"First: Every citizen has the right to health care. The State shall maintain public health and provide the means of prevention and treatment by building different types of hospitals and health institutions.

Second: Individuals and entities have the right to build hospitals, clinics,or private health care centers under the supervision of the State, and this shall be regulated by law."


Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mark-dorlester/guaranteed-health-care-in_b_280528.html&cp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Libertas1776 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. We did the same thing
when we were rebuilding Germany and France and elsewhere over 60 years ago. Now universal health care is a right guaranteed in their constitutions (thanks in part to us) and as for us...well we still have shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The early 21st century seems the polar opposite of the 20th.
There was a time when corporations were viewed, rightfully, with suspicion.

Now they are the solution to everything.

Private armies, private prisons, private water supplies. Private hospitals and health insurance.

It ain't right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Djinn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. the French had National Health
Edited on Sun Nov-08-09 11:52 PM by Djinn
in the 1930's - brought to them by (as always) the Union movement - was not a result of US rebuilding after the war - reforms after the war were devised and instituted by the Securite Sociale (dominated again by the union movement)

Germany's universal health harks back to Bismarck's time and HMO type coverage has been banned since before the war, while I'm not as au fait with it as I am with the French, I'm not entirely sure they'd be happy with the characterization that it came at the benevolence of the US post WW2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I believe we also demanded that Japan add it to their Constituion
after WWII as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Israel has it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-08-09 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. The serious answer is that the US only wanted to be able to
give away the contracts to build the hospitals. Those contracts were the prizes for American and European contractors.

The powers that be in the State Department and the Pentagon didn't give a shit how the hospitals were run after that. Getting everything working smoothly and efficiently is a long and difficult process that is likely to drain public coffers. There is no profit in owning the system while it is still being rebuilt and plugging the holes in public health and well-being.

There are provisions forcing Iraq to sell of public resources though. So later, after the slow and difficult work of making the health care system thorough and complete is done, THEN they might try to force Iraq to sell large parts of it to foreign investors. The health care system just isn't ready to be profitable yet until after it gets rebuilt and matures.


The outraged answer though is ,why the hell does the media let them get away with insisting that Socialized medicine is so evil and doomed to failure here when it is the accepted method for efficiently rebuilding public health everywhere else? That blatant hypocrisy is really astounding. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
5. So, uh... invading Iraq was, like, um the first step to getting Single Payer in the US?
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 12:22 AM by kenny blankenship
You could probably claim something like that in an OP and the DU SUCKER PATROL would swallow it whole. So long as you paired it with an explanation like: "and that's why Obama says we have to leave 50,000 troops in Iraq forever."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polly7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
8. Iraq always had free health care.
Edited on Mon Nov-09-09 11:40 AM by polly7
The best in the area, with the most up to date hospitals and best educated medical personnel. Years of genocidal sanctions preventing simple medicines from entering, medical equipment from getting in and repairs being made, the Gulf War and Bush's invasion destroyed what was left. Iraq was years ahead in taking care of its citizens health-care.

Iraq's health care system

While some critics focused on the failure to deliver the PHC system, others questioned the whole U.S. approach. Iraq had developed a centralized free health care system in the 1970s using a hospital based, capital-intensive model of curative care. The country depended on large-scale imports of medicines, medical equipment and even nurses, paid for with oil export income, according to a "Watching Brief" report issued jointly by the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and the World Health Organization (WHO) in July 2003.

Unlike other poorer countries, which focused on mass health care using primary care practitioners, Iraq developed a Westernized system of sophisticated hospitals with advanced medical procedures, provided by specialist physicians. The UNICEF/WHO report noted that prior to 1990, 97 percent of the urban dwellers and 71 percent of the rural population had access to free primary health care; just 2 percent of hospital beds were privately managed.

http://www.alternet.org/world/46856/health_care_in_iraq... /

Independent, secular Iraq had the most advanced scientific-cultural order in the Arab world, despite the repressive nature of Saddam Hussein’s police state. There was a system of national health care, universal public education and generous welfare services, combined with unprecedented levels of gender equality.

http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/?id=33836

In 1991, Iraq had 1,800 primary health centres, according to the UN children's agency UNICEF.

As a result of US war and sanctions, a decade later that number had fallen to 929, of which a third require serious rehabilitation, one of the most pressing needs to date. The US-British sponsored sanctions and wars against the Iraqi people have killed more than 2 million Iraqi civilians, a third of them were children under the age of five. Iraq's health care and education systems were deliberately targeted for destruction.

http://www.countercurrents.org/iraq-hassan011204.htm

Their system was already 'built' and working just fine ................... once, before it was destroyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Interesting
I did not know this.

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polly7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. You're very welcome. :) nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-09-09 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC